Case law

Davis v. Fieker

952 P.2d 505 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1998

H.L. v. … Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. at 1989 ; Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 , 100 S.Ct. 2671 , 65 L.Ed.2d 784 (1980); Beal v. Doe, 432 U.S. 438 , 97 S.Ct. 2366 , 53 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); Maher v.

State Ex Rel. King v. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co.

162 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1933

was held to be within the power of the Legislature to lay down a general rule for the protection of mineral rights of the adjoining landowners and leave the details of enforcing that rule to an administrative agency or board … State v. Pinckney, 22 S. C. 484; State v. Pacific Guano Co., 22 S. C. 50; State v. Paxson 119 Ga. 730 , 46 S. E. 872 ; Brown v. State, 5 Colo. 496 ; McCaslin v. State, 38 Ind. App. 184 , 75 N. E. 844 .

Howe v. Hall

76 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1919

It was held in the ease of Brown v. … Surety Co. v. Turnham, 58 Okla. 583 , 160 Pac. 468 ; Williams v. Kelly, 71 Oklahoma, 176 Pac. 204 ; Callahan v. Callahan, 47 Okla. 542 , 149 Pac. 135 .

Deanda v. AIU Insurance

98 P.3d 1080 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 2004

Bishop v. … (Of a court) to overturn or set aside (a precedent) by expressly deciding that it should no longer be controlling law <in Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court overruled Plessy v. Ferguson>."

Beacon Realty Investments Co. v. Cantrell

771 P.2d 602 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1989

On the other hand, in the early case of Gray v. … Later, however, in City of Bristow v.

Christy v. the City of Kingfisher

13 Okla. 585 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1904

To the same effect is the case of Board of Aldermen of Denver v. Darrow, 22 Pac. 784 . … The supreme court of West Virginia, in the case of Arkle v. Board of Com'rs., 23 S.

Weaver v. Hoster

459 P.2d 614 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1969

Peterson v. Sapp, Okl., 385 P.2d 498 ; Beckman, Inc. v. May, Okl., 331 P.2d 923 . And in the case of Benson v. … Buck Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Johnson, 198 Okl. 664 , 181 P.2d 1003 ; St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Withers, Okl., 270 P.2d 341 ; Threadgill v. Anderson, Okl., 303 P.2d 297 ; Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Walcott v. Zoll

113 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1925

Walcott v. … BRANSON, V. C. J., concurs in conclusion.

Mannsville Consolidated School Dist. No. 7 v. Williamson

174 Okla. 18 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1935

Hixon v. Gossett, Co. Atty., 140 Okla. 243 , 283 P. 249 ; Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Board of Education of the City of Poteau et al., 158 Okla. 274 , 13 P. (2d) 115 . … Hixon, v. Gossett, County Attorney, supra; K. C. S. Ry. Co. v. Board of Education of the City of Poteau et al., supra.

Ottawa County Nat. Bank v. Bouldin

117 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1925

Board of Com’rs of Garfield County v. Beauchamp, 18 Okla. 1 , 88 Pac. 1124 ; Berry v. Barton, 12 Okla. 221 , 71 Pac. 1074 ; Morrill v. Casper et al., 13 Okla. 335 , 73 Pac. 1102 ; Rogers v. … Brown, 15 Okla. 524 , 86 Pac. 443 ; Carl et al. v. Oklahoma Woolen Mills, 16 Okla. 515 , 86 Pac. 66 ; Cates v. Miles, 67 Okla. 195 , 169 Pac. 888 ; Cabell v. McLish, 61 Okla. 224 , 160 Pac. 592 ; Campbell v.

Zahn v. Obert

24 Okla. 159 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

Oklahoma City v. Hill, 4 Okla. 531, 46 Pac. 568 ; Chisholm v. Weise, 5 Okla. 217 , 47 Pac. 1086 ; Brown v. Hartshorne, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 1049 ; McQuiston v. Walton, 12 Okla. 130 , 69 Pac. 1048 ; Conaway v. … Jennings v. Brown, 20 Okla. 294 , 94 Pac. 557 ; Huston v.

Doe Ex rel.Doe v. Independent School District No. I-89

780 P.2d 659 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1988

In our recent opinion in Trent v. … In Jarvis v.

Carr v. Thompson

27 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

A similar contention was considered and directly passed upon by the court in the case of Board of County Com’rs of Day County v. … Board of Com’rs. of Garfield County v. Porter et al., 19 Okla. 173 , 92 Pac. 152 .” Being without jurisdiction to consider the errors sought to be presented, the petition in error is dismissed. All the Justices concur.

In re Oklahoma Press Pub. Co.'s Taxes

200 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1948

Hearing was had before the board of equalization on May 2, 1946, resulting in an order as shown by the minutes of the board, as follows: “Motion by J. T. … In Grubb v. Johnson Oil Refg.

Barton v. Independent School District No. I-99

67 O.B.A.J. 1047 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1996

PURSUANT TO OUR HOLDING IN BABB V. … Markwell v. Whinery's Real Estate Inc., 869 P.2d 840, 845 (Okla.1994). 7 . Canis v. John R. Thomas & Assoc., 896 P.2d 522, 530 (Okla.1995); Roach v. Atlas Life Ins. Co., see note 5, supra. 8 . Ross v.

United States Rubber Co. v. City of Tulsa

103 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

Perry Water & Ice Co. v. City of Perry, 29 Okla. 593 , 120 Pac. 582 ; McKinney v. City of Wagoner, 45 Okla. 28 , 144 Pac. 1071 ; Buckeye Engine Co. v. City of Cherokee. 54 Qkla. 509, 153 Pac. 1166 ; Mitchell v. … City of Atoka, 76 Okla. 266 , 185 Pac. 96 ; Board County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Tulsa Camera Record Co., 103 Okla. 35 , 228 Pac. 110 ; O’Neal Engineering Co. v.

McIntosh v. Holtgrave

79 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1920

Such is the holding of this court in the cases of Brown v. Trent, 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 ; Elrod v. Adair, 54 Okla. 207 , 153 Pac. 660 ; Bridges v. Rea, 64 Oklahoma, 166 Pac. 416 ; Brewer v. … Commissioner Rosser, in the ease of Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. Hall

191 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1942

See, also, State Land Board v. Lee, 84 Ore. 431 , 165 P. 372 . … And in Board of County Com’rs v.

Nichols v. Department of Corrections

631 P.2d 746 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1981

The Oklahoma Board of Corrections may provide an insurance policy or bond to indemnify from personal civil liability each member of the Board of Corrections and any officer or employee of the Department whom the Board may … While this Court has recently held in Schrom v. Okl. Industrial Development, 536 *750 P.2d 904 (Okl.1975); State Board of Public Affairs v.

City of Sapulpa v. Land

101 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1924

Othér authorities supporting this rule are: Board of County Commissioners v. Hammerly, 85 Okla. 53 , 204 Pac. 445 ; Cooley’s Constitutional Law, 64; State v. Patterson, 181 Ind. 660 , 105 N. E. 228 : State ex rel. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners v.