Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.45s
James v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 2
201 Okla. 573 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1949
In the case of Reynolds v. … In an Ohio case, Board of Education v. Nichol, 70 Ohio App. 467 , 46 N.
Cited 14 timesPublished136 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1929
Stanley, county treasurer of Marshall county, Okla., and the board of county commissioners, of Marshall county, Okla. *15 TJie facts are agreed upon.: “Agreed Statement of Facts. School District No. 4, v. … See, also, Rabon v.
Cited 2 timesPublished62 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1916
In Kerker et al. v. … City of Perry v. Davis, 18 Okla. 429 , 90 Pac. S65; Paulsen v. City of El Reno, 22 Okla. 734 , 98 Pac. 958 ; Jenkins v. Oklahoma City, 27 Okla. 230 , 111 Pac. 941 ; Schultz v.
Cited 10 timesPublished207 Okla. 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1952
Defendants predicate their contention of error in the assessment of exemplary damages upon their assumed premise that there was no proof of actual damages, and cite cases including Brown v. … Defendants cite Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. Stewart, 172 Okla. 143 , 45 P. 2d 121 ; Galt-Brown Co. v. Lay, 183 Okla. 87 , 80 P. 2d 567 ; Pure Oil Co. v.
Cited 20 timesPublished257 P.3d 984 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 2011
Assoc. v. State Indust. … In Latting v.
Cited 13 timesPublished178 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1935
Brown, deceased, covering his accounts from the date of his appointment on January 3, 1925, to December 10, 1932. … V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, and CORN, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished34 Okla. 644 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1912
This is a companion case to Federal Trust Co. v. Coyle, ante, 126 Pac. 800 , and the facts of the two cases are almost identical. … He further testified that this was the only question that came up with regard to the authority of the board.
Cited 3 timesPublished610 P.2d 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1980
Sanders, John V. LaPlant, and David W. Griffith. … The county board of equalization has no authority to alter this policy decision.
Cited 21 timesPublishedOklahoma City v. Green Construction Co.
184 Okla. 98 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1938
Board of Education, District 15, Ottawa County, v. Castle, 168 Okla. 399 , 33 P.2d 190 , and Sinclair, etc., v. Excise Board of Tulsa County, 173 Okla. 375 , 49 P.2d 114 . … Since it is a jurisdictional, essential, so to speak, and the absence of such evidence makes the judgment void and subject to direct attack (Board of Ed., etc., v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMcAlister v. State Ex Rel. Walton
96 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1923
Davis v. Whitehead, 86 Okla. 273 , 208 Pac. 216 . In the case of City of Dallas v. St. R. R. Co., 105 Tex. 343 , 148 S. … Richardson v. Mayes (Tex. Cv. App.) 223 S. W. 546 ; Powers v. Cade (Miss.) 72 South. 864 ; People ex rel. O’Reilly v. Mills (Colo.) 70 Pac. 322 ; State v. Thorson (S. D.) 33 L. R. A. 582; Fletcher v.
Cited 7 timesPublished23 Okla. 597 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1909
Board of Com’rs v. Labore et al., 37 Kan. 480 , 15 Pac. 577 ; Thompson and Wife v. Wheeler & Wilson Mfg. Co., 29 Kan. 476 ; St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company v. Reirson, 38 Kan. 359 , 16 Pac. 443 . … In the case of Board of Com’rs v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedMiller v. State Ex Rel. Standard Savings Ass'n
70 Okla. 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1918
Bank v. Gayle, County Treasurer, 55 Okla. 301 , 155 Pac. 552 , the principal announced is reaffirmed. But the defendant calls our attention to State ex rel. Oklahoma City Times Co. v. … In Trimmer v. State, supra, Mr. Justice Kane says in the body of the opinion: .
Cited 8 timesPublished315 P.2d 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1957
The pleadings are substantially the same as when this case was first before us, Anderson v. … In Hillsdale Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished99 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924
Comanche Ice & Fuel Co. v. Binder & Hillery, 70 Okla. 28 172 Pac. 629 ; Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. Richards, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 749 ; Deming Inv. Co. v. Shannon, 62 Okla. 277 , 162 Pac. 471 ; Cressler v. … Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 417 ; Johnson v. Gillette, 66 Okla. 308 , 168 Pac. 1031 ; Brown v. Calvert, 57 Okla. 364 , 157 Pac. 284 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedChicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Dennis
44 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914
Co. v. Brooks, 29 Okla. 351 , 116 Pac. 908 . … See, also, Coalgate Co. v. Hurst, 25 Okla. 588 , 107 Pac. 657 ; G., C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Taylor, 37 Okla. 99 , 130 Pac. 574 .
Cited 3 timesPublished197 Okla. 514 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1946
Ross v. Hunter, 53 Okla. 423 , 157 P. 85 ; and in later cases this statement is referred to as a correct rule in proper cases. … Caffey v. Veale, 193 Okla. 444 , 145 P. 2d 961 , and the authorities cited therein. City of Tulsa v. District Court, 174 Okla. 470 , 51 P. 2d 511 , contains an excellent discussion of the application of these two rules.
Cited 4 timesPublished101 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1924
Othér authorities supporting this rule are: Board of County Commissioners v. Hammerly, 85 Okla. 53 , 204 Pac. 445 ; Cooley’s Constitutional Law, 64; State v. Patterson, 181 Ind. 660 , 105 N. E. 228 : State ex rel. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners v.
Cited 121 timesPublishedCreech v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
47 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1915
BROWN, J. Judgment was rendered in this case in the superior court of Grady county May 9, 1912, from which the plaintiff brings error to this court. … Turner v. First National Bank, 40 Okla. 489 , 189 Pac. 703 ; Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co., 32 Okla. 280 , 122 Pac. 241 . For the reasons stated the appeal must be dismissed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJackson v. State Ex Rel. Hackett
136 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1929
Schwartz et al. v. State et al., 70 Okla. 205 , 174 Pac. 255 ; Nash v. Denton, 59 Kan. 771 , 51 Pac. 896 . Counsel for plaintiff admits that the motion should have been sustained under authority of Schwartz et al. v. … Hinton et al. v. State ex rel. Neal, 57 Okla. 777 , 156 Pac. 161 ; Joint School District et al. v. Eirst National Bank of Kingfisher et al., 125 Okla. 243 , 257 Pac. 318 .
Cited 3 timesPublished638 P.2d 450 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1981
In Arthur v. … See Arthur v. City of Stillwater, 611 P.2d 637, at 643 (1980).
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna