Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

0.45s

  • James v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 2

    201 Okla. 573 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1949

    In the case of Reynolds v. … In an Ohio case, Board of Education v. Nichol, 70 Ohio App. 467 , 46 N.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • School Dist. No. 4 v. Stanley

    136 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1929

    Stanley, county treasurer of Marshall county, Okla., and the board of county commissioners, of Marshall county, Okla. *15 TJie facts are agreed upon.: “Agreed Statement of Facts. School District No. 4, v. … See, also, Rabon v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Ardmore v. Appollos

    62 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1916

    In Kerker et al. v. … City of Perry v. Davis, 18 Okla. 429 , 90 Pac. S65; Paulsen v. City of El Reno, 22 Okla. 734 , 98 Pac. 958 ; Jenkins v. Oklahoma City, 27 Okla. 230 , 111 Pac. 941 ; Schultz v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Oden v. Russell

    207 Okla. 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1952

    Defendants predicate their contention of error in the assessment of exemplary damages upon their assumed premise that there was no proof of actual damages, and cite cases including Brown v. … Defendants cite Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. Stewart, 172 Okla. 143 , 45 P. 2d 121 ; Galt-Brown Co. v. Lay, 183 Okla. 87 , 80 P. 2d 567 ; Pure Oil Co. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Fent v. Henry

    257 P.3d 984 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 2011

    Assoc. v. State Indust. … In Latting v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re Brown's Estate

    178 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1935

    Brown, deceased, covering his accounts from the date of his appointment on January 3, 1925, to December 10, 1932. … V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, and CORN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Federal Trust Co. v. Spurlock

    34 Okla. 644 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1912

    This is a companion case to Federal Trust Co. v. Coyle, ante, 126 Pac. 800 , and the facts of the two cases are almost identical. … He further testified that this was the only question that came up with regard to the authority of the board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cantrell v. Sanders

    610 P.2d 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1980

    Sanders, John V. LaPlant, and David W. Griffith. … The county board of equalization has no authority to alter this policy decision.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma City v. Green Construction Co.

    184 Okla. 98 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1938

    Board of Education, District 15, Ottawa County, v. Castle, 168 Okla. 399 , 33 P.2d 190 , and Sinclair, etc., v. Excise Board of Tulsa County, 173 Okla. 375 , 49 P.2d 114 . … Since it is a jurisdictional, essential, so to speak, and the absence of such evidence makes the judgment void and subject to direct attack (Board of Ed., etc., v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • McAlister v. State Ex Rel. Walton

    96 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1923

    Davis v. Whitehead, 86 Okla. 273 , 208 Pac. 216 . In the case of City of Dallas v. St. R. R. Co., 105 Tex. 343 , 148 S. … Richardson v. Mayes (Tex. Cv. App.) 223 S. W. 546 ; Powers v. Cade (Miss.) 72 South. 864 ; People ex rel. O’Reilly v. Mills (Colo.) 70 Pac. 322 ; State v. Thorson (S. D.) 33 L. R. A. 582; Fletcher v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McMurtry v. Byrd

    23 Okla. 597 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1909

    Board of Com’rs v. Labore et al., 37 Kan. 480 , 15 Pac. 577 ; Thompson and Wife v. Wheeler & Wilson Mfg. Co., 29 Kan. 476 ; St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company v. Reirson, 38 Kan. 359 , 16 Pac. 443 . … In the case of Board of Com’rs v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Miller v. State Ex Rel. Standard Savings Ass'n

    70 Okla. 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1918

    Bank v. Gayle, County Treasurer, 55 Okla. 301 , 155 Pac. 552 , the principal announced is reaffirmed. But the defendant calls our attention to State ex rel. Oklahoma City Times Co. v. … In Trimmer v. State, supra, Mr. Justice Kane says in the body of the opinion: .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Anderson

    315 P.2d 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1957

    The pleadings are substantially the same as when this case was first before us, Anderson v. … In Hillsdale Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hensley v. Conard

    99 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

    Comanche Ice & Fuel Co. v. Binder & Hillery, 70 Okla. 28 172 Pac. 629 ; Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. Richards, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 749 ; Deming Inv. Co. v. Shannon, 62 Okla. 277 , 162 Pac. 471 ; Cressler v. … Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 417 ; Johnson v. Gillette, 66 Okla. 308 , 168 Pac. 1031 ; Brown v. Calvert, 57 Okla. 364 , 157 Pac. 284 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Dennis

    44 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914

    Co. v. Brooks, 29 Okla. 351 , 116 Pac. 908 . … See, also, Coalgate Co. v. Hurst, 25 Okla. 588 , 107 Pac. 657 ; G., C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Taylor, 37 Okla. 99 , 130 Pac. 574 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Arterbery v. Hargrove

    197 Okla. 514 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1946

    Ross v. Hunter, 53 Okla. 423 , 157 P. 85 ; and in later cases this statement is referred to as a correct rule in proper cases. … Caffey v. Veale, 193 Okla. 444 , 145 P. 2d 961 , and the authorities cited therein. City of Tulsa v. District Court, 174 Okla. 470 , 51 P. 2d 511 , contains an excellent discussion of the application of these two rules.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of Sapulpa v. Land

    101 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1924

    Othér authorities supporting this rule are: Board of County Commissioners v. Hammerly, 85 Okla. 53 , 204 Pac. 445 ; Cooley’s Constitutional Law, 64; State v. Patterson, 181 Ind. 660 , 105 N. E. 228 : State ex rel. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners v.

    Cited 121 timesPublished
  • Creech v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

    47 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1915

    BROWN, J. Judgment was rendered in this case in the superior court of Grady county May 9, 1912, from which the plaintiff brings error to this court. … Turner v. First National Bank, 40 Okla. 489 , 189 Pac. 703 ; Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co., 32 Okla. 280 , 122 Pac. 241 . For the reasons stated the appeal must be dismissed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Hackett

    136 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1929

    Schwartz et al. v. State et al., 70 Okla. 205 , 174 Pac. 255 ; Nash v. Denton, 59 Kan. 771 , 51 Pac. 896 . Counsel for plaintiff admits that the motion should have been sustained under authority of Schwartz et al. v. … Hinton et al. v. State ex rel. Neal, 57 Okla. 777 , 156 Pac. 161 ; Joint School District et al. v. Eirst National Bank of Kingfisher et al., 125 Okla. 243 , 257 Pac. 318 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. Cartwright

    638 P.2d 450 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1981

    In Arthur v. … See Arthur v. City of Stillwater, 611 P.2d 637, at 643 (1980).

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.