Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

0.31s

  • McKennon v. Winn

    1 Okla. 327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1893

    (Bishop on Contracts, S. 153; Mallory v. Gillette, 21 N. Y. 412 ; Wyman v. Goodrich, 26 Wis. 21 ; Green v. Brookins, 23 Mich. 48 ; White v. Maynard, 111 Mass. 250 .) … Co. v. O'Laughlin, C. C. A. 49 Fed. Rep. 440.)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. Dillingham

    44 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1914

    Devault et al. v. Merchants’ Exchange Co., 22 Okla. 624 , 98 Pac. 342 ; Turley v. Hayes & Shirk, 28 Okla. 655 , 115 Pac. 769 ; Bottoms v. Neukirchner et al., 40 Okla. 142 , 136 Pac. 774 ; Brown-Beane Co. v. … Sumner et al. v. Sherwood, 25 Okla. 70 , 105 Pac. 642 ; Tishomingo Electric Light & Power Co. v. Harris, 28 Okla. 10 , 113 Pac. 713 ; State Savings Bank, etc., v. Bedden et ah, 38 Okla. 444 , 134 Pac. 20 ; Malloy v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Walton, Mayor v. Donnelly

    83 Okla. 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1921

    Burns v. Linn, supra; Board of Education v. Best, 26 Okla. 366 , 109 Pac. 563 ; State v. Cummings, 47 Okla. 44 , 147 Pac. 161 . In the case of Kemp v. City of Monett, (Mo. Ct. of App. of St. Louis) 69 S. … This court,- in applying the rule of ejus-dem generis in the case of Board of County Commissioners v.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Beck v. Davis

    175 Okla. 623 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1936

    The accident was reported to the Industrial Accident Board of Texas. A claim blank was furnished respondent and he admits that he filled this out and returned it to the Texas board. … Co. v. State Industrial Com., 151 Okla. 272 , 3 P. [2d] 199 ; Continental Oil Co. v.

    Overruled in part by Oklahoma Steel Corporation v. Chafin, 1960 Okla. LEXIS 275 (1960)Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Williamson

    304 P.2d 314 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1956

    Co. v. Parkinson, 10 Cir., 136 F.2d 506 ; State ex rel. Tharel v. Board of County Commissioners of Creek County, 188 Okl. 184 , 107 P.2d 542 ; Walker v. Stubblefield, supra; Jones v. McGrath, supra; Casner v. … State Board of Public Affairs, supra, the validity of an Act appropriating certain funds to the State Board of Affairs was attacked. In the opinion therein we cited Wells v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • South Oklahoma Town Co. v. Acree

    166 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1933

    Pine v. State Industrial Commission, 108 Okla. 185 , 235 P. 617 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 ; Tulsa Terminal Storage & Transfer Co. v. … Thomas, 162 Okla. 5 , 18 P. (2d) 891 ; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea *111 Co. v. McHan, 162 Okla. 8 , 18 P. (2d) 875 ; Spivey & McGill v. Nixon, 163 Okla. 278 , 21 P. (2d) 1049 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fabric Fire Hose Co. v. Town of Afton

    95 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

    Board of County Commissioners v. Clarke & Courts, 12 Okla. 197 , 70 Pac. 212 ; Robertson v. Blaine County, 90 Fed. 63 , 47 L. R. A. (N. S.) 478; Barnes v. Turner, 14 Okla. 284 , 78 Pac. 108 ; City of Sulphur v. … Webb v. Logan, 48 Okla. 354 , 150 Pac. 116 ; Delzell v. Couch, 70 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 361 ; Brant v. Brankle, 82 Okla. 144 , 198 Pac. 844 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. JOHNSON, C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cumbey v. State

    699 P.2d 1094 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1985

    In an early case, Rice v. … See, e.g., Sigler v. Lowrie, 404 F.2d 659 (8th Cir.1968) cert. denied 395 U.S. 940 , 89 S.Ct. 2010 , 23 L.Ed.2d 456 (1969); Sims v. Parke Davis & Co., 334 F.Supp. 774 (E.D.Mich.1971); Preston v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Merritt v. Corporation Commission

    438 P.2d 495 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1968

    See Kingwood Oil Company v. Hall-Jones Oil Corporation, Okl., 396 P.2d 510 . … Title 82 O.S. 1961 , § 1071, creates the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, and Section 1072 sets forth the Board’s authority.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co

    162 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1933

    Treas., v. Blaine, 149 Okla. 153 , 300 P. 369 , this court, in speaking of a protest involving a levy of 1 mill for a library fund, held: “Chapter 7, S. … Treas., v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. McClendon

    144 Okla. 39 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1930

    Under this condition the rule of law announced in the cases of Thompson v. Board of Com’rs, Delaware Co., 56 Okla. 79 , 155 Pac. 881 ; Delaware County v. Board of Com’rs., 56 Okla. 81 , 155 Pac. 881 ; Drummond v. … City of Ada, 86 Okla. 32 , 206 Pac. 200 ; Arinwine v. Sawner, 112 Okla. 252 , 240 Pac. 1042 ; Town of Covington v. Coberly, 136 Okla. 20 , 275 Pac. 1064 ; State ex rel. Freeman v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Van Trees v. Territory of Oklahoma

    7 Okla. 353 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1898

    Douglass Tp., 52 Kan. 452 , 34 Pac. 1046 ; State v. Moore, 74 Mo. 413 ; Inhabitants of Hancock v. Hazzard, 12 Cush. 112 ; Thompson v. Board, 30 Ill. 99 ; State v. Croft, 24 Ark. 550 ; State v. … W. 67 ; Griffin v. Board, (Miss.) 15 South. 107 ; U. S. v. Watts, 1 N. M. 562; Supervisors v. Kaime, 39 Wis. 468 ; State v. Clarke, 73 N. C. 255 ; State v. Blair, 76 N. C. 78 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • School Dist. No. 39, Mayes County v. Hicks

    138 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1929

    R. 780; City of Junction City v. Blades (Kan. App. N. D.) 41 Pac. 677 ; Stafford v. City of Oskaloosa (Iowa.) 20 N. W. 174 ; I. C. R. R. Co. v. Borders, 61 Ill. App. 55 ; Wooster v. Broadway & S. A. R. Co., 25 N. Y. … S. 378; McDonald v. Savoy, 110 Mass. 49 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sabin v. Levorsen

    193 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1943

    Co. v. Phillips, 69 Fed. 2d 901; Board of Education of the City of Great Bend v. Board of Commissioners of Barton County, 144 Kan. 124 , 58 P. 2d 40 ; Paramount Publix Corp. v. … Crabtree v. Standard Savings & Loan Association, 187 Okla. 189 , 102 P. 2d 127 ; Board of Education of the City of Great Bend v. Board of County Commissioners of Barton County, supra; Summerall v. Covington Bros.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Marland

    178 Okla. 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1936

    In Huston v. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Adams

    52 Okla. 557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1915

    Gowen v. Bush, 76 Fed. 349 , 22 C. C. A. 196 ; Fredenthal v. Brown & McCabe, 52 Or. 33 , 95 Pac. 1116 ; L. & N. R. Co. v. Pearson, Adm’r, 97 Ala. 211 , 12 South. 176 .” *562 In the case of the City of Wynnewood v. … Durkee v. Central Pac. R. R. Co., supra; Fredenthal v. Brown, supra; Havens v. R. I., etc., R. R. Co., 26 E. I. 48, 58 Atl. 247 , 3 Ann. Gas. 617, and note page 621.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Mundy v. Dependent School Dist. No. 32

    272 P.2d 447 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1954

    In Hoskins v. … J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and O’NEAL, WILLIAMS, and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. CORN, J., dissents.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ravia Granite Ballast Co. v. Wilson

    22 Okla. 689 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1908

    In the case of Cairo & Fulton Railroad Company v. Trout, 32 Ark. 17, Mr. … Cairo & Fulton Railroad Co. v. Hecht & Stevens, 29 Ark. 661 ; Odd Fellows’ Building Association v. Hogan, 28 Ark. 261 ; Aikin v. Gold Mining Co., 6 Cal. 186 ; Bruce et al. v. Arrington, 22 Ark. 362 , and cases cited.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wadsworth v. Neher

    138 Okla. 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1929

    Mullen v. … In Penny v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mayfield v. Bradley and Burris

    6 Okla. 547 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 2, 1897

    of and fully set forth in the case of Gray v. … The case as brought here does, in fact, make the principles and reasoning in Gray v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.