Case law

McNeill v. City of Tulsa

69 O.B.A.J. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1998

Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose, Etc., 586 P.2d 1098 (Okl.1978). … A Board of Trustees to administer that fund, and the duties, membership and powers of such board; 5.

Spann v. Cresswell

198 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1947

Allen et al. v. Board of Com’rs of Pittsburg Co., 28 Okla. 773 , 116 P. 175 . The same rule applies to the power granted county superintendents to change school district boundaries. … School District No. 84 of Pottawatomie County et al. v. Asher School District No. 112 et al., 168 Okla. 282 , 32 P. 2d 897 .

Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Creek v. Oklahoma Tax Comm.

190 Okla. 658 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1942

In Cowart v. … In Crawford v.

Seikel v. Grimes

189 Okla. 658 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1941

In support of this contention, plaintiffs cite *662 Fry et al. v. Swift, 164 Okla. 4 , 22 P. 2d 94 . … It is pointed out in Fry v.

Duncan v. Golden

316 P.2d 1116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1957

In Bracken v. … Speaker v. Board of County Com’rs, Okl., 312 P.2d 438 .

Wills v. Buzbee

42 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1914

Lathim v. Schlack, 27 Okla. 522 , 112 Pac. 968 ; Lawson et al. v. Zeigler, 33 Okla. 368 , 125 Pac. 724 ; Hurst et al. v. Wheeler, 35 Okla. 639 , 130 Pac. 934; Williams v. … Carr v. Thompson et al., 27 Okla. 7 , 110 Pac. 667 ; Foulds v. Hubbard, 36 Okla. 146 , 128 Pac. 108 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Rickey, 33 Okla. 481 , 126 Pac. 735 ; Brown-Beane Co. et al. v.

Green v. Sammons

142 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1930

Shepard v. … In Overstreet et al. v.

Meek v. Tilghman

55 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1916

In Brown v. Weaver, 76 Miss. 7 , 23 South. 388 , 42 L. R. A. 423, 71 Am. St. Rep. 512 , in a well-considered opinion the court quotes from. Murfree on Sheriffs as follows: . … In Brown v. Weaver, supra, the court says: “ ‘A resort to a measure so extreme in cases of misdemeanor was never permitted by the common law. 1. East, P. G. 302.

Smith v. Deaconess Hospital

161 P.3d 314 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 2007

entire board. … . ¶ 11 The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals faced a similar situation in Decker v. IHC Hospitals, Inc., 982 F.2d 433 (10th Cir.1992).

Offutt v. Fizz-O Water Co.

187 Okla. 522 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1940

Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & Carpet Co., 43 Okla. 440 , 143 P. 190 ; Whitney v. Harris, 157 Okla. 186 , 11 P. 2d 153 ; Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559 , 67 P. 2d 448 . The appeal is dismissed. BAYLESS, C. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur.

Beveridge v. Westgate Oil Co.

171 Okla. 360 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

OSBORN, V. O. J. … Co. v.

Pryor v. Western Paving Co.

74 Okla. 308 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1919

Davidson v. New Orleans, supra, Wulzen v. Board of Supervisors. supra, and cases therein cited. … Wulzen v. ^Board of Supervisors, supra, arid cases above cited.

Rudd v. Wilson

32 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1912

In Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown et al., 19 Okla. 77 , 91 Pac. 849 , Mr. … P. & P. 729; Parson v. Haskell, 30 Ill. App. 444 ; Mattoon v. Holmes, 14 Ill. App. 392 ; Green v. Plalack, 25 Tex. 417 ; Richter v. Presno Canal Co., 101 Cal. 582 , 36 Pac. 96 ; Davis v.

Molone v. Wamsley

80 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1921

In the case of Walker v. Brown, Mr. … Walker v. Brown, 43 Okla. 144 , 141 Pac. 681 ; Jefferson v. Winkler, 26 Okla. 653 , 110 Pac. 755 ; Murrow Indian Orphans Home v. McClendon, 64 Okla. 205 , 166 Pac. 1101 ; Ex parte Webb, 225 U. S. 663 ; Williams v.

House v. Independent School District I-29 of Muskogee County

939 P.2d 1127 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1997

See Krischer v. … in the absence of harm from the delay; Childs v.

In Re Initiative Petition No. 366, State Question No. 689

73 O.B.A.J. 1106 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 2002

The petition makes an exception for educational institutions subject to rules adopted by the Board of Education and State Board of Regents. 12 Oklahoma's Attorney General, deeming the ballot title proposed by the proponents … In Alexander v.

Federal Surety Co. v. Evans

139 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1929

Verschoyle v. McDaniels, 127 Okla. 166 , 260 Pac. 55 ; Gilmore v. Smith, 93 Okla. 4 , 219 Pac. 92 ; Wagnon v. Davison, 79 Okla. 209 , 192 Pac. 565 ; Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .

Miller v. Markley

49 Okla. 177 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

BROWN, J. The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, sued the defendant in error for damages. … In the case of Vannier v.

Friedman v. Weisz

8 Okla. 392 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

(Douglass v. Wolf, 6 Kan. 88 .) … (Provins v. Lovi, 6 Okla. 94 , 50 Pac. 81 ; Jay v. Zeisness, 6 Okla. 591 , 52 Pac. 928 .) The errors complained of are not sufficient to warrant a reversal of the judgment.

Woodard v. Strosnider, Co. Superintendent

33 Okla. 277 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1912

This court had occasion in the *280 case of Felkner v. Winningham et al., ante, 122 Pac. 534 , to pass upon this question, and said: “From the action of the county superintendents acting jointly, section 8080, Comp. … said board had no jurisdiction to entertain said appeal.”