Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.22s

  • In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205

    183 Okla. 343 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1938

    BATLESS, V. C. J. This involves an appeal from a finding of the Secretary of State that Initiative Petition No. 142 was insufficient. … This discussion of this subject in State v. Olcott, 62 Ore. 277 , 125 P. 303 , is wholesome, and applies here.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • McNeill v. City of Tulsa

    69 O.B.A.J. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1998

    Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose, Etc., 586 P.2d 1098 (Okl.1978). … A Board of Trustees to administer that fund, and the duties, membership and powers of such board; 5.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Scheutz v. Dossey Lumber Co.

    195 Okla. 439 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1945

    The rule that is applicable to the consideration on appeal of .records and orders such as these is stated in Beveridge v. … There are cases, and Scheutz cites them, including Anderson-Kerr, Inc., v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • School Dist. No. 10 of Woodward County v. Drake

    167 Okla. 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1934

    Board of Education, 98 Okla. 237 , 224 P. 712 ; School Dist. No. 2 ex rel. Hixon et al. v. Gossett, Co. Atty., 140 Okla. 243 , 283 P. 249 ; Wilson v. … Oklahoma City, 120 Okla. 266 , 251 P. 484 ; Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 47½ v. Jacobs et al., 134 Okla. 101 , 272 P. 360 , and Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okla. 164 , 292 P. 15 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wylie v. Chesser

    173 P.3d 64 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 2007

    In re Estate of MacFarline, 2000 OK 87, ¶ 3 , 14 P.3d 551, 554-555 (quoting Carmichael v. Beller, 1996 OK 48 , 914 P.2d 1051 , 1053 and citing Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , ¶ 22 n. 30, 989 P.2d 448 ). … Baker v. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, 1986 OK 8 , 718 P.2d 348, 351 (citing Board of Trustees of the Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Loper v. Shumate

    282 P.2d 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1955

    We think that decision is controlling in the matter before us, See Harness v. Myers, 143 Okl. 147 , 288 P. 285 , and Knox v. … As said in Minnehaha County v. Thorne, 6 S.D. 449 , 61 N.W. 688 , quoted in State ex rel. Mitchell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Norman v. Lambert

    64 Okla. 238 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1917

    Carter v. Missouri Min. Co., 6 Okla. 11 , 41 Pac. 356 ; Everett v. Akins, 8 Okla. 184 , 56 Pac. 1062 ; Harness v. McKee-Brown Lbr. Co., 17 Okla. 624 , 89 Pac. 1020 ; Territory v. Choctaw, O. & W. R. … Co., 20 Okla. 663 , 95 Pac. 420 ; Taylor v. Johnson, 23 Okla. 50 , 99 Pac. 645 ; Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Duncan Cotton Oil Co. v. Cox, 41 Okla. 633 , 139 Pac. 270 .

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Meadows v. Meadows

    619 P.2d 598 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1980

    Bragg, 183 Okl. 122 , 80 P.2d 287 (1938), 54 A.L.R.2d 1435 § 6(f); Huskey v. Batts, 530 A.2d 1375 (Okl.App.1975); Umber v. Umber, 591 P.2d 299, 301 (Okl.1979), Social Security benefits and Hisquierdo v. … Littleton v. Littleton, 224 Ala. 103 , 139 So. 335 (1932); Caldwell v. Central of Georgia Ry., 158 Ga. 392 , 123 S.E. 708 (1924). 4 . Brown v. Brown, 32 Ohio App.2d 139, 141 , 288 N.E.2d 852 (1972). 5 .

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Pryor v. Western Paving Co.

    74 Okla. 308 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1919

    Davidson v. New Orleans, supra, Wulzen v. Board of Supervisors. supra, and cases therein cited. … Wulzen v. ^Board of Supervisors, supra, arid cases above cited.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Beveridge v. Westgate Oil Co.

    171 Okla. 360 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

    OSBORN, V. O. J. … Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Creek v. Oklahoma Tax Comm.

    190 Okla. 658 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1942

    In Cowart v. … In Crawford v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Deaconess Hospital

    161 P.3d 314 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 2007

    entire board. … . ¶ 11 The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals faced a similar situation in Decker v. IHC Hospitals, Inc., 982 F.2d 433 (10th Cir.1992).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Offutt v. Fizz-O Water Co.

    187 Okla. 522 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1940

    Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & Carpet Co., 43 Okla. 440 , 143 P. 190 ; Whitney v. Harris, 157 Okla. 186 , 11 P. 2d 153 ; Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559 , 67 P. 2d 448 . The appeal is dismissed. BAYLESS, C. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Friedman v. Weisz

    8 Okla. 392 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

    (Douglass v. Wolf, 6 Kan. 88 .) … (Provins v. Lovi, 6 Okla. 94 , 50 Pac. 81 ; Jay v. Zeisness, 6 Okla. 591 , 52 Pac. 928 .) The errors complained of are not sufficient to warrant a reversal of the judgment.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Busey v. Crump

    108 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1925

    County Attorney and Election Board of Seminole County v. Purported Election Officials of Cromwell, seeking to have the election declared void. … Banta, secretary of the county election board of Seminole county. At the same time, Mr. Banta wrote a letter to Mr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rudd v. Wilson

    32 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1912

    In Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown et al., 19 Okla. 77 , 91 Pac. 849 , Mr. … P. & P. 729; Parson v. Haskell, 30 Ill. App. 444 ; Mattoon v. Holmes, 14 Ill. App. 392 ; Green v. Plalack, 25 Tex. 417 ; Richter v. Presno Canal Co., 101 Cal. 582 , 36 Pac. 96 ; Davis v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In Re Initiative Petition No. 366, State Question No. 689

    73 O.B.A.J. 1106 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 2002

    The petition makes an exception for educational institutions subject to rules adopted by the Board of Education and State Board of Regents. 12 Oklahoma's Attorney General, deeming the ballot title proposed by the proponents … In Alexander v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Parks v. Illinois Life Insurance

    176 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1936

    W. loc. cit. 342; McCreary v. Bamberger, 151 Pa. 323 , 24 Atl. 1066 , 31 Am. St. Rep. 760 ; Am. H. M. Soc. v. Wadhams, 10 Barb. (N. Y.) 597; Benz v. Fabian, 54 N. J. Eg. loc. cit. 620, 35 Atl. 760 ; Mansfield v. … Ed. 855 ; Platt v. Union Pacific R. Co.. 99 U. S. loc. cit. 61. 25 L. Ed. 424 ; Thurmond v. Faith, 69 Ga. loc. cit. 838.” This court in Roberson et al. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City of Tulsa v. McCormick

    63 Okla. 238 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1917

    Co. v. Tulsa, 45 Okla. 382 , 145 Pac. 398 , and Flannagan v. City of Tulsa, 55 Okla. 318 , 155 Pac. 542 . … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Dennis

    44 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914

    Co. v. Brooks, 29 Okla. 351 , 116 Pac. 908 . … See, also, Coalgate Co. v. Hurst, 25 Okla. 588 , 107 Pac. 657 ; G., C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Taylor, 37 Okla. 99 , 130 Pac. 574 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.