Case law

SAVE THE ILLINOIS RIVER, INC. v. STATE ex. rel. OKLA. STATE ELECTION BD.

2016 OK 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 8, 2016

v. … STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL LICENSURE Cited 1946 OK 171, 170 P.2d 208, 197 Okla. 291, HARDING v. STATE ELECTION BD. Discussed 1960 OK 245, 357 P.2d 421, WICKERSHAM v.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

157 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

Bowling v. Merry, 91 Okla. 176 , 217 P. 404 ; Hawkins v. Bryan, 128 Okla. 27 , 261 P. 167 ; Orth v. Hajek, 127 Okla. 50 ; 259 P. 854 ; Greer v. McNeal, 11 Okla. 519 , 69 P. 891 ; Hocker v. … We-held in a recent case, No. 21386, County Excise Board of Creek County v.

Alluwee Oil Co. v. Shufflin

32 Okla. 808 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

Garrett et al. v. Walcott, 25 Okla. 574, 106 Pac. 848 ; Baldwin v. Keith, 13 Okla. 624 , 75 Pac. 1124 ; James v. Germania Iron Co., 107 Fed. 597 , 46 C. C. A. 476 ; Wallace v. Adams, 143 Fed. 716 , 74 C. C. … Ed. 800 ; Steel v. Refining Co., 106 U. S. 447, 451 , 1 Sup. Ct. 389, 27 L. Ed. 226 ; French v. Fyan, 93 U. S. 169, 172 , 23 L. Ed. 812 ; Ehrhardt v. Hogaboom, 115 U. S. 67, 69 , 5 Sup. Ct. 1157, 29 L.

W. S. Thompson Co. v. Bond, County Treas.

47 Okla. 547 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

BROWN, J. This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court, rendered April 18, 1914, on appeal to said court from the action of Henry C. … In the case of McAlester Trust Co. v.

Coleman-Nelson Gasoline Co. v. Montgomery

151 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1931

In the ease of Smith v. … In the case of Clewell v.

Chelsea Elevator & Storage Co. v. Rohland

30 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1911

Finch et al. v. Brown et al., 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 . It has also been decided that such omissions in the case-made cannot be supplied by a certificate of the stenographer. Tootle, Wheeler & Motter Mer. Co. v. … Wade v. Gould, 8 Okla. 690 , 59 Pac. 11 .

Bulgin v. American Law Book Co.

77 Okla. 112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1920

Howie Mining Co. v. McGary, 256 Fed. 38 . … Merryman v. McQuillan, 53 Okla. 590 , 157 Pac. 319 ; Bilby v. Continental Gin Co., 53 Okla. 316 , 156 Pac. 199 ; Culbertson v. Walton Trust Co., 49 Okla. 103 , 152 Pac. 355 ; Brown v.

Atwater v. Hassett

27 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1910

State ex rel. v. Hooker, County Judge, 22 Okla. 712 , 98 Pac. 964 ; Rea, County Clerk, v. Board of County Com’rs., infra. … In Patterson v.

Union Indemnity Co. v. Saling

166 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1933

Likewise the Supreme Court of the United States has approved this classification of boards similar to our State Industrial Commission. Crowell v. Benson, supra. … It is pointed out that the Industrial Commission, is a board of limited jurisdiction, and the rule announced by the Utah court in the case of Parker v. Industrial Commission of Utah, supra, is invoked.

Richardson v. Smith

394 P.2d 480 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1964

In Lamb v. … In Harris Foundation v.

Bryan Co. State Bank v. Amer. Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth

56 Okla. 529 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1916

A. page 672, pote 4, and the authorities cited in Eubank v. Bryan County State Bank, 216 Fed. 839, 840 , 133 C. C. A. 43 , 44. Under our view of the law of this case, the American National Bank of Ft. … Worth is entitled to prevail, and, in support of our conclusion, we desire to cite the case .of Eubank v. Bryan County State Bank, 216 Fed. 833 , 133 C. C.

Cowart v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

665 P.2d 315 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1983

The resolution of this issue requires examination of Barry v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 173 Okl. 645 , 49 P.2d 548 (1935), and Morley v. … Board of County Commissioners.

City of Tulsa v. Hillcrest Medical Center, Inc.

292 P.2d 430 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1956

In Sawyer v. … A similar problem was before this court in Smartt v. Board of Com’rs of Craig County, 67 Okl. 141 , 169 P. 1101 , L.R.A. 1918C, 313 .

Higbee v. City of Bartlesville

147 Okla. 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1930

Arnold v. Board of County Commissioners, 124 Okla. 42 , 254 Pac. 31 ; 22 C. J. 801; Parks v. Ash (Ga.) 149 S. E. 207 ; U. S. v. Feather River Lumber Co., 30 Fed. (2d) 642. … The minutes introduced were the official record of the proceedings of the board of city commissioners.

City of Midwest City v. Harris

561 P.2d 1357 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1977

Teach. v. Independent S.D. # 89, Okl, 540 P.2d 1171, 1176 (1975). … In such case the arbitration board's determination shall be final.”

School Dist. No. 10 of Woodward County v. Drake

167 Okla. 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1934

Board of Education, 98 Okla. 237 , 224 P. 712 ; School Dist. No. 2 ex rel. Hixon et al. v. Gossett, Co. Atty., 140 Okla. 243 , 283 P. 249 ; Wilson v. … Oklahoma City, 120 Okla. 266 , 251 P. 484 ; Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 47½ v. Jacobs et al., 134 Okla. 101 , 272 P. 360 , and Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okla. 164 , 292 P. 15 .

Wilkinson v. Hale

184 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1939

In Burks v. … In Key v.

Higgins v. Street

19 Okla. 45 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1907

In Brown v. … In Brown v. Cairns, 107 Iowa 727 , 77 N. W. 478 , the question is very fully discussed and the authorities cited supporting the rule stated in Jones, supra. To the same effect are: Nerrill v. Willis, 51 Neb. 162 , 70 N.

McNeill v. City of Tulsa

69 O.B.A.J. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1998

Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose, Etc., 586 P.2d 1098 (Okl.1978). … A Board of Trustees to administer that fund, and the duties, membership and powers of such board; 5.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Champion

468 P.2d 794 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1970

Champion was charged with contempt, we cite them, as follows: Bearden v. State, Okl.Cr., 458 P.2d 914 ; Crumb v. State, Okl.Cr., 458 P.2d 909 ; and Champion v. State, Okl.Cr., 456 P.2d 571 . … Oklahoma Bar Association v.