Case law

Wadsworth v. Neher

138 Okla. 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1929

Mullen v. … In Penny v.

Valley Refining Co. v. Rock Island Refining Co.

167 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1934

Baird & McKinnis, 5 Okla. 133 , 48 P. 180 ; Brown v. Davidson, 42 Okla. 598 , 142 P. 387 ; Tally v. Harrison, 60 Okla. 110 , 159 P. 366 . … As was said by this court in Brown v.

MUSKOGEE FAIR HAVEN MANOR v. Scott

957 P.2d 107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1998

Edwards v. Board of Com'rs, 169 Okla. 87 , 36 P.2d 6 (1934) (the Court's syllabus). Finally, a judge's powers in equity are not invocable when clear and adequate statutory remedies are available. Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. … Tway, Inc. v.

Layne-Western Co. v. City of Depew

177 Okla. 338 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1936

This court has twice recently stated that it will not extend the mandatory rule of the Smartt Case (Smartt v. Board of Com’rs, 67 Okla. 141 , 169 P. 1101 ). See Faught v. … The question of lack of mandatory duty was also passed upon in the cases of Board of Commissioners v. Alexander, 171 Okla. 288 , 42 P. (2d) 884 , and Anadarko Funeral Home v.

Y & Y CAB COMPANY v. Smith

289 P.2d 964 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1955

v. … In Brown v. McNair, supra, it was also urged that the verdict was excessive.

Hiller v. Rist

362 P.2d 678 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1961

Jacobsen v. Howard, 164 Okl. 88 , 23 P.2d 185 . … Jacobsen v. Howard, supra. See also Enders v. Longmire, 179 Okl. 633 , 67 P.2d 12 , and Daniels v. Scott, Okl., 340 P.2d 223, 226, 227 .

Dudley v. King

285 P.2d 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1955

Ahrens v. Com. Nat’l Bank, 100 Okl. 250 , 229 P. 237 ; Howard v. Brown, 172 Okl. 308 , 44 P.2d 959 ; Crane v. Owens, 180 Okl. 452 , 69 P.2d 654 . … Ahrens v. Commercial Nat’l. Bank, supra; Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. Arnold, 94 Okl. 120 , 221 P. 19 ; Howard v. Brown, supra; Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Tradesmen’s Nat. Bank, 10 Cir., 57 F.2d 686 .

Burke Grain Co v. Stinchcomb

70 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1918

Joseph, Mo. v. Stinchcomb Grain Co., Oklahoma City. … Deal v. Thompson, 51 Okla. 256 , 151 Pac. 866 .

Anderson v. Walker

333 P.2d 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1958

Co. v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 167 Ok. 414, 30 P.2d 171 ; Herndon v. Anderson, 165 Okl. 104 , 25 P.2d 326 ; Morrison v. Fry, 208 Okl. 239 , 255 P.2d 270 ; Lowden v. … Board of Commissioners of Harmon County, 161 Okl. 245 , 17 P.2d 690 ; Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 155 Okl. 34 , 7 P.2d 902 .

State v. Raedeker

158 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1932

Our attention has been called to Myers et al. v. … board. True the evidence shows the conversation with .Thatcher was in the room where the commissioners were Jin session, but no contract was made by the board and no record was made. J. L.

Robinson v. First Nat. Bank of Ardmore

107 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1924

The Bank Commissioner and the First National Bank pressed Eugene V. … We are referred to the decisions of this court in Lovett v. Lankford, 47 Okla. 12 , 145 Pac. 767 , and State ex rel. v. Norman, 86 Okla. 36 , 206 Pac. 522 .

Adkins v. Investors Syndicate

175 Okla. 557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1935

The rule laid down in Francen v. … In Barnhart v.

Guaranty Laundry Co. v. Pulliam

200 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1948

In such cases it has been held that where the board of directors is deadlocked so that there is a failure of the board to function in behalf of the corporation, or there is internal dissension to the extent the board of directors … In Kansas case of Bowen v. Bowen-Romer Flour Mills Corp., supra, this language is found: “ . . . Because of dissensions between the two groups of stockholders, the vacancy in the board of directors cannot be filled.

Fuller v. Getz

168 Okla. 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1934

And in Baker v. Gaines Bros. … Whitson v.

Bankers Reserve Life Co. v. Rice

99 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Co. v. Lewis, 187 U. S. 335 , 47 L. Ed. 204 ; Natl. Life Association v. Brown, 103 Ga. 382 , 29 S. E. 927 . … Wallace. 93 Ind. 7 ; Kline v. Natl. Benefit Association, 111 Ind. 462 ; Ferguson v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 187 Mass. 8 ; Brown v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia (S. C.) 103 S. E. 555 ; Deal v. Deal et al., 87 S.

Finley v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Keys

12 Okla. 621 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1903

In People v. … In People v.

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Milam

45 Okla. 742 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

Co. v. Caple’s Adm’x, 110 Va. 514 , 66 S. … It is also held in Payne v. McCormick Harv.

Andrews v. Proctor

196 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1945

See, also, State v. … Also, see Honnold v. Board of Commissioners of Carter Co., 71 Okla. 71 , 177 P. 71 . In view of the above decisions we are of the opinion that the petition states a cause of action and that, the demurrers of O. P.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.

170 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1934

See Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 P. 423 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. … The issue raised on this point is fully decided in the recent case of Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, B. I. & P.

Kirk v. McClendon

94 Okla. 33 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1923

When a probate judge acts in this capacity, he acts as any other member of the board, and not as a probate judge or as a probate court.” In the case of Norris v. … See, also, Aldrich v. Barton, 153 Cal. 488 , 95 Pac. 900 .