Case law

MUSKOGEE FAIR HAVEN MANOR v. Scott

957 P.2d 107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1998

Edwards v. Board of Com'rs, 169 Okla. 87 , 36 P.2d 6 (1934) (the Court's syllabus). Finally, a judge's powers in equity are not invocable when clear and adequate statutory remedies are available. Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. … Tway, Inc. v.

Spalding v. Enid Cemetery Ass'n

76 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1919

Co. v. Rockland, 36 C. C. … Other eases to the same effect are Tausig v. St. Louis & K. R. Co., 65 S. W. 969 ; Railroad Co. v. Richards, 8 Kan. 101 .

Y & Y CAB COMPANY v. Smith

289 P.2d 964 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1955

v. … In Brown v. McNair, supra, it was also urged that the verdict was excessive.

Adkins v. Investors Syndicate

175 Okla. 557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1935

The rule laid down in Francen v. … In Barnhart v.

State v. Raedeker

158 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1932

Our attention has been called to Myers et al. v. … board. True the evidence shows the conversation with .Thatcher was in the room where the commissioners were Jin session, but no contract was made by the board and no record was made. J. L.

Burke Grain Co v. Stinchcomb

70 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1918

Joseph, Mo. v. Stinchcomb Grain Co., Oklahoma City. … Deal v. Thompson, 51 Okla. 256 , 151 Pac. 866 .

Robinson v. First Nat. Bank of Ardmore

107 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1924

The Bank Commissioner and the First National Bank pressed Eugene V. … We are referred to the decisions of this court in Lovett v. Lankford, 47 Okla. 12 , 145 Pac. 767 , and State ex rel. v. Norman, 86 Okla. 36 , 206 Pac. 522 .

Guaranty Laundry Co. v. Pulliam

200 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1948

In such cases it has been held that where the board of directors is deadlocked so that there is a failure of the board to function in behalf of the corporation, or there is internal dissension to the extent the board of directors … In Kansas case of Bowen v. Bowen-Romer Flour Mills Corp., supra, this language is found: “ . . . Because of dissensions between the two groups of stockholders, the vacancy in the board of directors cannot be filled.

Fuller v. Getz

168 Okla. 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1934

And in Baker v. Gaines Bros. … Whitson v.

Bankers Reserve Life Co. v. Rice

99 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Co. v. Lewis, 187 U. S. 335 , 47 L. Ed. 204 ; Natl. Life Association v. Brown, 103 Ga. 382 , 29 S. E. 927 . … Wallace. 93 Ind. 7 ; Kline v. Natl. Benefit Association, 111 Ind. 462 ; Ferguson v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 187 Mass. 8 ; Brown v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia (S. C.) 103 S. E. 555 ; Deal v. Deal et al., 87 S.

Finley v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Keys

12 Okla. 621 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1903

In People v. … In People v.

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Milam

45 Okla. 742 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

Co. v. Caple’s Adm’x, 110 Va. 514 , 66 S. … It is also held in Payne v. McCormick Harv.

Andrews v. Proctor

196 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1945

See, also, State v. … Also, see Honnold v. Board of Commissioners of Carter Co., 71 Okla. 71 , 177 P. 71 . In view of the above decisions we are of the opinion that the petition states a cause of action and that, the demurrers of O. P.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.

170 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1934

See Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 P. 423 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. … The issue raised on this point is fully decided in the recent case of Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, B. I. & P.

Kirk v. McClendon

94 Okla. 33 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1923

When a probate judge acts in this capacity, he acts as any other member of the board, and not as a probate judge or as a probate court.” In the case of Norris v. … See, also, Aldrich v. Barton, 153 Cal. 488 , 95 Pac. 900 .

Keating v. Johnson

67 O.B.A.J. 1680 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1996

McKye v. State Election Board of State of Oklahoma, 890 P.2d 954 (Okla.1995) (State House of Representative seat involved); Nesbitt v. … York v.

Gentry-Bowers Lumber Co. v. Hamill

75 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1919

Lee v. Tonsor, 62 Oklahoma, 161 Pac. 805 ; Clark v. Hall, 10 Kan. 81 . … Co. v. Sayre, 72 Oklahoma, 178 Pac. 671 ; Stetson-Post Mill Co. v. Brown, 21 Wash. 619 , 59 Pac. 507 , 75 Am. St. Rep. 862 .

Kramer v. Gypsy Oil Co.

68 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1917

In Sullins et al., Board of County Commissioners, v. State ex rel. Barnard, Commissioner Charities and Corrections, 33 Okla. 526 , 126 Pac. 732 , Judge Turner quotes with approval in Auditor General v. … Supervisor v. Stinson, 4 Hill (N. Y.) 136; Overseers v. Overseers, 18 Johns (N. Y.) 407; Todd v. Birdsell, 1 Cow. (N. Y.) 260 ( 13 Am. Dec. 522 ) ; County Treasurer v. Bunbury, 45 Mich. 84 , 7 N. W. 705 .” In Moore v.

Oklahoma Ass'n of Municipal Attorneys v. State

577 P.2d 1310 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1978

Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority v. Cowen Construction Co., Okl., 518 P.2d 1264 (1974); State ex rel. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority v. Nashert & Sons, Inc., Okl., 518 P.2d 1267 (1974); and Wiseman v. … LAVENDER, V. C. J., and DAVISON, WILLIAMS, BERRY and BARNES, JJ., concur. HODGES, C.

Dobry v. Dobry Flour Mills, Inc.

270 P.2d 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1954

As a result of this dis-^ cussion a special meeting of the board of directors was held on December 18, 1947, at which time the board voted to give the plaintiff a salary allowance of $300 per month which was to begin November … J., JOHNSON, V. €. J.’ and HORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. ■