Case law

Oklahoma Association of Insurance Agents v. Hudson

385 P.2d 453 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1963

In Tinker v. … P. v. Kutscher, 179 Ill. 340 , *456 53 N.E. 620 ; Supreme Conclave, I. O. H. v. Rehan, 119 Md. 92 , 85 A. 1035 , 46 L. R.A.,N.S. 308.

Chickasha Nat. Bank v. Cloud, County Treasurer

40 Okla. 623 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1914

of county commissioners, when in session as a county board of equalization that year, reduced the same 25 per cent, as shown by the testimony of all the members of the board of county commissioners, one being a stockholder … (Note 36 Cyc. 1080, citing Mack v. Jastro, 126 Cal. 130 , 58 Pac. 372 ; State v. Conkliney, 19 Cal. 501 ; People v. Thornton, 186 Ill. 162 , 57 N. E. 841 ; Roche v. Jersey City, 40 N. J. Law, 257; Bracken v.

Franks v. Adolph Kempner Co.

91 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1923

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Company, 198 U. S. 236 , 49 L. Ed. 1031 . … Bailey v. Bensley, 87 Ill. 556 .

Edwards v. Carter

167 Okla. 287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1934

Bohart et al. v. Anderson, supra; Trapp, Auditor, v. Wells Fargo Express Co., supra. … Brown v. Weston. 6 Neb. 16 ; Weston, Auditor, v. Herdman, 64 Neb. 24 , 89 N. W. 384 ; Green v. Purnell, 12 Md. 329 ; Dorman v. Sargent, 20 N. M. 413, 150 P. 1021 ; Reed v. Huston, 24 Idaho, 26 , 132 P. 109 , Ann.

Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. New State Bank of Woodward

124 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1926

Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Browne, supra; Willoughby v. Weinberger, supra. The intention of .the parties was directly in line with the duty of the bank, both to Adams & Crump and to the plaintiff. … As supporting the view here expressed, see: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hanover State Bank, supra; Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Browne, 69 Mont. 144 , 220 Pac. 1114 ; State Nat. Bank v. First Nat.

Protest of Murray

140 Okla. 240 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

This contention is settled by the rule announced in Perrine v. … J., LESTER, V. O. J., and HUNT, CLARK, RILEY, HEFNER, CULLI-SON, and S WIND ALL, JJ., concur.

In Re Meek

169 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1934

See Meek v. State (Okla. Cr.) 22 P. (2d) 933 , and Meek v. State (Okla. Cr.) 22 P. (2d) 938 . … Many authorities are cited by petitioner in support of this contention, but, as we view the present appeal, they were all fore *90 closed against him in the cases of Meek v. State and Ex parte Meek, supra.

FORD v. THE OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

2026 OK 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 2026

. §952 Morrison v. Board of Education of Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 6 , supra; Saxon v. Macy , supra; and Randall v. Fields , supra. … See also Skouby v. Board of Educ. of Schl Dist. No. 60 , 1930 OK 273 288 P. 461 Univ. of Tex. v.

Shefts Supply, Inc. v. Fischer

171 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935

Smith et ux. v. Felkel, 9l Okla. 184, 217 P. 196 ; Lavery v. Gardener, 116 Okla. 63 , 243 P. 216 ; Smith v. Burt, 150 Okla. 34 , 300 P. 748 ; Frith v. Thompson (Kan.) 173 P. 915 ; Wilson v. Brown (Cal.) 273 P. 847 . … Brown & Sons State Bank v. Polen, 132 Okla. 121 , 270 P. 9 ; Hunt v. Rowton, 143 Okla. 181 , 288 P. 342 .

Karns v. Pentecostal Church of God

148 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1931

Under authority of Taylor v. Taylor, 90 Okla. 128 , 2T5 Pac. 1070; Smith v. Walker, 116 Okla. 213 , 243 Pac. 955 , the judgment is affirmed. See, also, section 9741, C. O. … And Michie v. Haas, 134 Okla. 57 , 272 Pac. S85, wherein it was held: “The redemption period is therefore two years and such additional time as intervenes prior to the issuance of the deed.” LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C.

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Whitt

167 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1933

A similar question was presented to and considered by the Supreme Court of Kansas in the case of Robertson v. Board of Commissioners of Labette County et al., 252 P. 196 . … Board of Commissioners, supra.

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry Co.

151 Okla. 137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1931

In support thereof, the protestee cites Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board, 141 Okla. 130 , 284 Pac. 27 . … Power v. Wenner, Co. Treas., 121 Okla. 190 , 249 Pac. 408 , and section; 8583, C. O. S. 1921, are cited.

Davis v. Childers

181 Okla. 468 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1937

Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. First State Bank of Oklahoma City, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 P. 115 . Scott Stine, Assistant State Auditor, L. D. Melton, Research Director of the Oklahoma Tax Commission, and Dr. J. … In Graham v.

Dougherty-Nichols Construction Co. v. Town of Jenks

115 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1924

, township board, school district board or any member or members of the aforesaid commissioners, or of any of the above named boards, to make any contract for, incur, acknowledge, approve, allow or authorize any indebtedness … No authorities are cited in support of this contention, and it seems to be contrary to the rule announced by this court in tile case of Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v.

Powell v. Johnson-Larimer Dry Goods Co.

35 Okla. 644 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1913

Healy v. Davis, 32 Okla. 296, 122 Pac. 157 ; Fairbanks-Morse & Co. v. Thurmond, 31 Okla. 612 , 122 Pac. 167 . … Iliff v. Arnott, 31 Kan. 672 , 3 Pac. 525 ; Brown v. Clark et al., 31 Kan. 521 , 3 Pac. 415 ; 2 Cyc. 797. The appeal is therefore dismissed. All the Justices concur.

New Vinita Hardware Co. v. Porter

45 Okla. 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

BROWN, J. … See Avants v. Bruner, 39 Okla. 730 , 136 Pac. 593 ; Collier v. Gannon, 40 Okla. 275 , 137 Pac. 1179 ; St. L. & S. R. Co. v. Shepard, 40 Okla. 589 , 139 Pac. 833 ; Kelley v. State, 40 Okla. 355 , 138 Pac. 167 .

American Sash & Door Co. v. McGregor

129 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1926

Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Cook, 105 Okla. 185 , 231 P. 495 , and Klein v. … In the case of Smith v.

City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114

65 O.B.A.J. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1993

Board of Comm’rs v. … As stated in Board of Educ. v.

State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. District Court of Oklahoma County

278 P.2d 841 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1954

Construction Co. v. Burwell, 185 Okl. 444 , 93 P.2d 1092 . … Vette v. Childers, 102 Okl. 140 , 228 P. 145 .

Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. v. Hagan

189 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1941

Eubanks v. Barnsdall *212 Oil Co., 169 Okla. 31 , 35 P. 2d 873 ; Fox v. Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P. 2d 129 ; Shawnee Cotton Oil Co. v. Bumgarner, 180 Okla. 103 , 67 P. 2d 959 . … Fox v. Brown, supra. Pine Valley Lumber Co. v. Watson, supra.