Case law

State Ex Rel. Dillard v. Gassaway

142 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1930

Thereafter, Vada Dillard, by her attorneys, Brown & Brown, filed in the district court of Atoka county, Okla., a motion in which she alleged that Cub E. Dillard had taken said car out of Carter county, Okla. … In Chivers v.

American Insurance Ass'n v. State Industrial Commission

745 P.2d 737 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1987

See Westinghouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth., Okl., 720 P.2d 713, 720 [1986]. 8 . Greer County Election Board v. Elliott, 26 Okl. 546 , 109 P. 731, 732 [1910]; Webb v. … State Board of Education, 190 Okl. 556 , 126 P.2d 241, 242 [1942] and Ritchie v. Raines, Okl.Cr., 374 P.2d 772, 775-776 [1962], 10 .

State Ex Rel. Mose v. District Court of Marshall County

46 Okla. 654 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1915

Co. v. … Morrison v. Brown, Judge, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 ; Herndon v. Hammond, County Judge, 28 Okla. 616 , 115 Pac. 775 ; Ex parte Oklahoma, 220 U. S. 191 , 31 Sup. Ct. 426, 55 L. Ed. 431 ; State v.

Orr v. Tiger

170 Okla. 424 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1935

Alma Graham deraigned her claim of title from Lizzie Brown, the alleged wife of the said Roland Brown, and pleads former adjudication and statute of limitations. T. H. … Union State Bank of Shawnee v. Mueller, 68 Okla. 152 , 172 P. 650 ; Exchange Trust Co. v. Oklahoma State Bank of Ada, 126 Okla. 193 , 259 P. 589 ; Morgan v. Daniels, 130 Okla. 201 , 266 P. 464 .

Haynes v. Caporal

571 P.2d 430 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1977

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co., Okl., 421 P.2d 244 (1966). The Central Liquor, Co. decision found language of § 536 to be plain and unambiguous with its meaning clear and unmistakable. … Barlow v. Jones, 37 Ariz. 396 , 294 P. 1106 .’ ”

Hagen v. Independent School District No. 1-004

157 P.3d 738 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 3, 2007

Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment, 1994 OK 58 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1148-1144 . The district court's seope of review is unlimited. Abel v. Oklahoma Real Estate Commission, 453 P.2d 1007, 1009 . … Wheeler, Inc. v. Scott, 1991 OK 95 , 818 P.2d 475, 480 ; Loftis v. Collins, 1966 OK 94 , 415 P.2d 927 . See also, Andrews v. Independent Sch. Dist.

Nantz v. Nantz

749 P.2d 1137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1988

NANTZ, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann NANTZ, Appellee. No. 62029. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 2, 1988. As Corrected February 3, 1988. Dan R. Brown, Lawton, for appellant. John N. … Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges, Okl., 535 P.2d 295, 298 [1975], citing Graham v.

Christian v. Shideler

382 P.2d 129 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1963

In the case of Stockton v. … In the case of Forston v.

Town of Walters v. Orth

59 Okla. 99 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

Also in the case of Bassett v. City of El Paso, 88 Tex. 175 , 30 S. … In Howard v. Smith, 91 Tex. 8 , 38 S.

State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Krug

92 P.3d 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 2004

Brown (Brown) and Basil Mack because they refused to vacate a house owned by the deceased. Brown defended her possession of the house by contending she inherited it from the deceased. … The cited case, OBA v.

St. Louis San Francisco R. Co. v. Caldwell

75 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1919

The excise board of Choctaw county for the year ending June 30, 1916, made a levy for current expenses for the county and other municipalities situated therein, as follows, to wit: Choctaw county, 4.46 mills; Peter, Everidge … Co. v.

Moore v. Thayer

167 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1934

of the board, and participated in said meeting. … This case is very similar to that of Wentz v. Thomas, 159 Okla. 124 , 15 P. (2d) 65 .

Janeway v. Norton

61 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1916

Rep. 532 ; Shuman v. Ancient Order United Workmen et al., 110 *188 Iowa, 642, 82 N. W. 331 ; McLaughlin v. McLaughlin et al., 104 Cal. 171 , 37 Pae. 865, 43 Am. St. Rep. 83 ; Kemper v. … Knights of Maccabees of the World v. Sackett et al., supra; McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, supra; 29 , Cyc. 133, 134.

In Re Initiative Petition No. 27 of Oklahoma City

74 O.B.A.J. 3490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 2003

(Board) would be convened. … Brazell v. Zeigler, 1910 OK 193 , 110 P. 1052 ; Fite v. Lacey, 1984 OK 83, ¶ 16 , 691 P.2d 901, 904 ; See Okla. Const. art. XVIII, § 4(a).

In Re Felgar's Estate

207 Okla. 310 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1952

. *311 Monnet, Hayes & Brown, Oklahoma City, Person Woodall, and John M. (Jack) Luttrell, Norman, for plaintiffs in error. Joe A. Smalley and Williams & Benedum, Norman, for defendants in error. CORN, J. … McGill v. Cooper Supply Co., 196 Okla. 362 , 165 P.2d 829 ; see, also, Cockrell v. Martin, 124 Okla. 284 , 255 P. 1101 ; Parks v. Butler, 191 Okla. 329 , 129 P.2d 836 .

Bearmar v. Dux Oil & Gas Co.

64 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1917

Kolachny v. Galbreath, supra; Brown v. Wilson, supra. … In Brown v.

Seibold v. City of Muskogee

161 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1932

In Stoner v. … M., K. & T. v. City of Tulsa, 113 Okla. 21 , 238 P. 452 ; Grier v. Tulsa, 143 Okla. 244 , 288 P. 957 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Tulsa, 15 Fed. (2d) 960.

OKLAHOMA INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION v. POTTS

414 P.3d 351 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 2018

V. … In Calvey v.

Spangenberg v. Galena Perforating Co.

92 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1923

Also in the ease of Brown v. Williams, 24 Okla. 308 , 103 Pac. 588 , quoting from the syllabus, the court said: “In an action against H. … The case of Brown et al. v. First National Bank of Temple, 35 Okla. 726 , 130 Pac. 140 , was a case where Brown and Montgomery, as partners, were sued by the First National Bank of Tenrple.

Adair v. Cable

207 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 5, 1952

The court in that case refused to enjoin the county election board, and the certificate was issued to Adair. … This is different from the provisions found in 26 O.S. 1951 §§162 and 163, which were construed in Darst v.