Case law

Phillips v. Freas

151 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1931

The assessment is not void because of the manner in which the property was listed. *228 In the case of Pentecost v. … Treas., v. Sawyer, 63 Okla. 155 , 163 P. 717 , this court said: “Under chapter 152, Sess.

Knights & Ladies of Security v. Grey

70 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1918

E. 69 ; Weiss v. Swift & Co., 36 Pa. Super. Cf. 376; Strange v. Board of Com’rs, 173 Ind. 340 , 91 N. E. 242 ; State v. Brown et al., 163 Mo. App. 30 , 145 S. W. 1180 ; Mears Mining Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 162 Mo. … Webber v. Chicago, 148 Ill. 313 -318, 36 N. E. 70 ; Gillock v. People, 171 Ill. 307 , 49 N. E. 712 ; Winters v. Duluth 82 Minn. 127 , 84 N. W. 788 ; Lynch v. Murphy, 119 Mo. 163 , 24 S. W. 774 ; Woodworth v.

Sackett v. Rose

55 Okla. 398 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1916

Gen. v. Brown, 1 Wis. 513 ; Atty. Gen. v. Railway Co., 35 Wis. 425 ; Mason v. City of Ashland, 98 Wis. 540 , 74 N. W. 357 . … Co. v. Malone, 116 Ala. 600 , 22 South. 897 ; Dyer v. Brogan, 70 Cal. 136 , 11 Pac. 589 ; Wilkinson v. Carter, 22 Neb. 186 , 34 N. W. 351 ; Town of Woodville v. Harrison, 73 Wis. 360 , 41 N. W. 529 ; Lowry v.

Town of Sentinel v. Riley

171 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1935

Galt v. Galloway, 4 Pet. 332 . It is hardly necessary to refer to judicial decisions illustrating the rule. They are numerous. A few may be mentioned. De Armond v. Neasmith, 32 Mich. 231 ; Gurney v. … Wallace, 98 Okla. 155 , 224 P. 515 ; Jueschke v. Seeley, 98 Okla. 133 , 224 P. 341 ; Selby Oil, etc., Co. v. Rogers, 94 Okla. 269 , 221 P. 1012 ; Walters v.

Atlantic Refining Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

360 P.2d 826 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1959

Board of Commissioners of Payne County, 107 Okl. 266 , 231 P. 272 . We have heretofore determined when oil is produced for gross production tax purposes. In Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. … Co. v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Bond

47 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1915

Co. v. … All the Justices concur, except BROWN, J., not announcing.

Stewart v. Rood

61 O.B.A.J. 1914 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1990

First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings and Loan Board, 569 P.2d 993, 996 (Okla.1977). 21 . Id. … Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. State, 712 P.2d 40, 42-43 (Okla.1985). 23 . Id. at 42 . See also National Motor Club of Oklahoma v. State Insurance Board, 393 P.2d 511, 514 (Okla.1964). 24 .

Dierks Forests, Inc. v. Richards

414 P.2d 273 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1966

Petitioner cites Brown Bros. v. Parks, 176 Okl. 615 , 56 P.2d 883 ; and Texas Co. v. Atkinson, 178 Okl. 480 , 62 P.2d 1204 , as being controlling of the issues in this case. … However, petitioner misconstrues the Brown case, supra. There the claimant’s total disability was brought about by epilepsy and not from the injury. In Texas Company v.

Verschoyle v. McDaniels

127 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1927

In the case of Gilmore v. … Wagnon v. Davison. 79 Okla. 209 , 129 Pac. 565 ; McDonnell v. Continental Supply Co., 79 Okla. 286 , 193 Pac. 524 ; Hall v. Bank of Commerce, 80 Okla. 40 , 193 Pac. 990 ; Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

156 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1932

Treas., v. Blaine, 149 Okla. 153 , 300 P. 369 ; McMahan v. … Lindhard, 149 Okla. 161 , 300 P. 378 ; Protest of Trimble, 151 Okla. 74 , 300 P. 406 , and Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board of Muskogee County, 149 Okla. 70 , 299 P. 207 .

Ryan v. Sarkeys

113 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .

In Re Sides

158 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

Sides was found guilty before the administrative committee for section 13 of the State Bar of Oklahoma, in a cause before said committee pending entitled cause No. 20, Ethel Echols v. F. E. … CLARK, V. O. X, and RILEY and HEFNER, XT., absent.

Lusk v. Starkey, County Treasurer

53 Okla. 794 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

defendant below, pursuant to section 7, article 1, chapter 107, Session Laws ■ 1915, for the purpose of recovering certain taxes, paid under protest upon an alleged excessive levy of .834 mills, made by the county excise board … Co. et al., v. Eminhiser, County Treasurer, Tillman County, 53 Okla. 785 , 158 Pac. 915 , were argued together and are similar in a great many respects.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Bockoven

75 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1919

The nature of the drag tax was under consideration by this court in Lusk v. Eminhiser, 53 Okla. 785 , 158 Pac. 915 . … Lusk v. Starkey, 53 Okla. 794 , 158 Pac. 918 , is in point to the same effect, and Lusk v. Botts, 64 Oklahoma, 166 Pac. 172 , is in point by analogy.

In re the Annexation of Part of Stock District No. 10 To Stock

347 P.2d 806 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1959

In this connection they rely on Modern Builders, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 193 Okl. 141 , 141 P. 2d 800 . … In Burgin v.

Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. Tipken

190 Okla. 396 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1942

Lusk v. Green, 114 Okla. 113 , 245 P. 636 ; Brazell v. Brown, supra; Parker et al. v. Parker et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 144 S.W. 2d 303 ; Louisiana Canal Co. v. … Carlock v. Krug et al., 151 Kan. 407 , 99 P. 2d 858 ; Brazell v. Brown, supra; Parker et al. v. Parker et al., supra.

Culbertson v. Walton Trust Co.

49 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

BROWN, J. … Sheil v. Winters, 45 Okla. 525 , 146 Pac. 220 ; Kirkland v. Trezevant, 38 Okla. 445 , 134 Pac. 1198 ; Skirvin v. Goldstein, 40 Okla. 315 , 137 Pac. 1176 ; Skirvin v. Bass Fur. & Car.

Akin v. Harris

138 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1929

In the case of Kiefer v. … In the case of Alberty v.

Wells v. Childers

196 Okla. 353 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1945

The board may be entitled to *355 its compensation under the rule stated in Riley v. Carter, 165 Okla. 262 , 25 P. 2d 666 ; Edwards v. Carter, 167 Okla. 287 , 29 P. 2d 610 ; Telle v. … It was held, Prideaux v.

McArdle v. Stewart

446 P.2d 379 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1968

In Olmstead v. … J., IRWIN, V. C. J., and DAVIDSON, WILLIAMS, HODGES and LAVENDER, JJ., concur. BLACKBIRD, BERRY and McINER-NEY, JJ., dissent.