Case law

Baccus v. Banks

199 Okla. 647 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1947

They cite, among other authorities, Board of Com’rs v. Grimes, 75 Okla. 219 , 182 P. 897 ; Worley v. French, 184 Okla. 116 , 85 P. 2d 296 ; State v. Ellenstein, 121 N.J.L. 304 , 2 Atl. 2d 454; Post v. Land, 27 Colo. … Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; West Okla. Digest, Constitutional Law. §48. 4.

Phillips v. Phillips

556 P.2d 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1976

Roemer v. Roemer, Okl., 373 P.2d 55 (1962). … HODGES, V. C. J., dissents. 1 . “Then, gentlemen, I think I am ready to announce judgment in this case.

IN THE MATTER OF THE STRIKING OF NAMES OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION

2024 OK 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 2024

This Court further finds that the actions of the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association are in compliance with the Rules. … Higgins 420 S Lawton Ave Apt 517 Tulsa, OK 74127-8929 OBA # 14351 Robert Earl Jones Jr. 1819 Rolling Hills St Norman, OK 73072-6707 OBA # 11125 Theodore Koss Jr. 10604 Admiral Dr Oklahoma City, OK 73162-6806 OBA # 5240 John V.

Hughes Land Co. v. Bailey

30 Okla. 194 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

During the year 1904, Charley McNac, while seised of said premises in fee, died intestate, leaving surviving him his two daughters, Pauline Bailey, nee McNac, and Polly Brown, nee McNac, defendants in error. … The opinion of this court in Lamb v. Baker, 27 Okla. 739 , 117 Pac. 189 , establishes the law of this case.

In Re Sides

158 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

Sides was found guilty before the administrative committee for section 13 of the State Bar of Oklahoma, in a cause before said committee pending entitled cause No. 20, Ethel Echols v. F. E. … CLARK, V. O. X, and RILEY and HEFNER, XT., absent.

Red Eagle v. Free

191 Okla. 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1942

Overton v. Overton, 121 Okla. 1 , 246 P. 1095 ; Brown v. Brown, 104 Okla. 206 , 230 P. 853 . … CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, and HURST, JJ., absent.

Pottawatomie County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

167 Okla. 325 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1934

schools employed by the boards of education. … J., CULLISON, V. C. J., and SWINE ALL, MeNEILL, OSBORN, and BAY-LESS, JJ., concur.

Wolfenbarger v. Hennessee

520 P.2d 809 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1974

Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v. Mohr, 485 P.2d 235 (Okl.1971); State ex rel. Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Myers, 466 P.2d 640 (Okl.1970); State v. Guardian Funeral Home, 429 P.2d 732 (Okl.1967). … Klafter v. State Board of Examiners of Architects, 259 Ill. 15 , 102 N.E. 193 (1913).

O'Brien v. Cummings

167 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1933

Durham v. Brown, 164 Okla. 139 , 24 P. (2d) 295 ; McCrory v. High, 162 Okla. 75 , 19 P. (2d) 144 .

Town of Covington v. Coberly

136 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1929

The town was divided into three wards, but the county election board had designated only two election precincts in said town. … (Albright et al. v. Erickson, 23 Okla. 544 , 102 Pac. 112 .) The appeal is therefore dismissed. TEEHEE, HERR, DIFFENDAFFER, and HALL, Commissioners, concur. SWINDALL, J., not participating.

Jefferson v. British American Oil Producing Co.

193 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1943

GIBSON, V. C. J. … See, also, Oklahoma State Bank of Ada v. Mitchell, 179 Okla. 567 , 66 P. 2d 920 ; Rourke v. Myers, 184 Okla. 46 , 84 P. 2d 639 .

Tonini v. School Dist. No 17

155 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1932

Boards act as boards, not as individuals, and especially on the Sabbath Bay. … J„ CLARK, V. Cl J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS', and McNBILL JJ., concur. RILEY, HEFNER, and CTJL-, LISON, JJ., absent.

Town of Sentinel v. Riley

171 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1935

Galt v. Galloway, 4 Pet. 332 . It is hardly necessary to refer to judicial decisions illustrating the rule. They are numerous. A few may be mentioned. De Armond v. Neasmith, 32 Mich. 231 ; Gurney v. … Wallace, 98 Okla. 155 , 224 P. 515 ; Jueschke v. Seeley, 98 Okla. 133 , 224 P. 341 ; Selby Oil, etc., Co. v. Rogers, 94 Okla. 269 , 221 P. 1012 ; Walters v.

In re the Annexation of Part of Stock District No. 10 To Stock

347 P.2d 806 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1959

In this connection they rely on Modern Builders, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 193 Okl. 141 , 141 P. 2d 800 . … In Burgin v.

St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Smith

132 Okla. 150 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1928

In support of this oonitenition they cite State of Kansas v. County of Marian, 21 Kan. 308 , and National Bank v. … Counsel also cite State v. Board of County Commissioners (Kan.) 119 Pac. 327 , and A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.

Town of Nichols Hills v. Aderhold

207 Okla. 396 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1952

Atteberry v. Aulick, 204 Okla. 540 , 231 P. 2d 993 ; Bartlett v. Lashley, 204 Okla. 299 , 229 P. 2d 185 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 204 Okla. 356 , 230 P. 2d 271 ; Freeman v. … In Tibbets & Pleasant, Inc., v.

Dierks Forests, Inc. v. Richards

414 P.2d 273 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1966

Petitioner cites Brown Bros. v. Parks, 176 Okl. 615 , 56 P.2d 883 ; and Texas Co. v. Atkinson, 178 Okl. 480 , 62 P.2d 1204 , as being controlling of the issues in this case. … However, petitioner misconstrues the Brown case, supra. There the claimant’s total disability was brought about by epilepsy and not from the injury. In Texas Company v.

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

156 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1932

Treas., v. Blaine, 149 Okla. 153 , 300 P. 369 ; McMahan v. … Lindhard, 149 Okla. 161 , 300 P. 378 ; Protest of Trimble, 151 Okla. 74 , 300 P. 406 , and Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board of Muskogee County, 149 Okla. 70 , 299 P. 207 .

Pryor v. McCafferty

69 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1916

The questions raised in these canses are settled by the opinion in Carroll, Brough & Robinson v. … A further discussion here could serve no useful purpose or be of any avail- Huckins Hotel Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, 64 Okla. 235 , 166 Pac. 1043 .

Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. Sayer

72 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1918

A similar question was presented to the Supreme Court of Washington in the case of Statson-Post Mill Co. v. Brown, 21 Wash. 619 , 59 Pac. 507 , 75 Am. St. … Ed. 855 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654, 664 , 17 Sup. Ct. 453, 41 L. Ed. 865 ; Connolly v. Bouck, 174 Fed. 312 , 98 C. C. A. 184 .