Case law

City of Tulsa v. Johnson

193 Okla. 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1943

Jurd v. City of Tulsa, 183 Okla. 239 , 80 P. 2d 596 ; City of Sand Springs v. Kraus, 181 Okla. 6 , 72 P. 2d 726 . … City of Tulsa v. Suttle, 182 Okla. 283 , 77 P. 2d 104 . Notice, also, City of Shawnee v. Hewett, 37 Okla. 125 , 130 P. 546 .

Chapman v. Tulsa Used Lumber Wrecking Company

299 P.2d 787 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1956

Board of Equalization is the correct and proper valuation of the property. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD. and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION No. 420 STATE QUESTION No. 804

2020 OK 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 2020

In Kerby v. … Moran v.

Hodge v. Stegall

206 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1952

Smith v. State Board of Education, 190 Okla. 556 , 126 P. 2d 241 . … Pierstorff v. Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors, 68 Ohio App. 453 , 41 N. E. 2d 889 .

Lusk v. Starkey, County Treasurer

53 Okla. 794 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

defendant below, pursuant to section 7, article 1, chapter 107, Session Laws ■ 1915, for the purpose of recovering certain taxes, paid under protest upon an alleged excessive levy of .834 mills, made by the county excise board … Co. et al., v. Eminhiser, County Treasurer, Tillman County, 53 Okla. 785 , 158 Pac. 915 , were argued together and are similar in a great many respects.

KINGFISHER WIND v. WEHMULLER

2022 OK 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 2022

P ., v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization , 2003 WL 23099679 (Tenn. Ct. … In Rainbow Apartments v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board , 326 Ill. App.3d 1105 , 260 Ill.

School Districts Nos. 44 & 47 v. Baker

168 Okla. 413 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 3, 1934

The protesting voters and some of the common school districts affected appealed to this court. *414 The decision in this case is 'controlled by the decision of (his court in Board of Com’rs of Garter County et al. v. … In the instant case the judgment of the district court was rendered on appeal from the order of the board of county commissioners to the district court. There was no such (right of appeal.

McLaughlin v. National Benefit Life Insurance Co.

772 P.2d 383 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1988

Cox [v. Theus ], 569 P.2d [447] at 450 [Okla.1977] (citation omitted). This same policy was also expressed in Galt-Brown Co. v. … In the present case the Court of Appeals, in its initial consideration of the matter previously quoted in this opinion applied the standard of proof as set forth in the case of Galt-Brown Co. v.

Knights & Ladies of Security v. Grey

70 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1918

E. 69 ; Weiss v. Swift & Co., 36 Pa. Super. Cf. 376; Strange v. Board of Com’rs, 173 Ind. 340 , 91 N. E. 242 ; State v. Brown et al., 163 Mo. App. 30 , 145 S. W. 1180 ; Mears Mining Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 162 Mo. … Webber v. Chicago, 148 Ill. 313 -318, 36 N. E. 70 ; Gillock v. People, 171 Ill. 307 , 49 N. E. 712 ; Winters v. Duluth 82 Minn. 127 , 84 N. W. 788 ; Lynch v. Murphy, 119 Mo. 163 , 24 S. W. 774 ; Woodworth v.

In re Oklahoma County Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 3

202 Okla. 64 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1949

that the board of county commissioners appointed as the board of directors for the sewer improvement district, W. … J., ARNOLD, V. C. J., and CORN, LUTTRELL, HALLEY, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

Verschoyle v. McDaniels

127 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1927

In the case of Gilmore v. … Wagnon v. Davison. 79 Okla. 209 , 129 Pac. 565 ; McDonnell v. Continental Supply Co., 79 Okla. 286 , 193 Pac. 524 ; Hall v. Bank of Commerce, 80 Okla. 40 , 193 Pac. 990 ; Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .

Ryan v. Sarkeys

113 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .

Voight v. Saunders

206 Okla. 318 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1952

In Makrauer v. Board of Adjustment, City of Tulsa, 200 Okla. 285 , 193 P. 2d 291 , this court was considering similar amendatory, rezoning ordinances of Tulsa. … James, County Treasurer, v. State ex rel. Finney, etc., 160 Okla. 99 , 15 P. 2d 591 ; Foote v. Town of Watonga, 37 Okla. 43 , 130 P. 597 . Affirmed. HALLEY, V. C.

Sackett v. Rose

55 Okla. 398 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1916

Gen. v. Brown, 1 Wis. 513 ; Atty. Gen. v. Railway Co., 35 Wis. 425 ; Mason v. City of Ashland, 98 Wis. 540 , 74 N. W. 357 . … Co. v. Malone, 116 Ala. 600 , 22 South. 897 ; Dyer v. Brogan, 70 Cal. 136 , 11 Pac. 589 ; Wilkinson v. Carter, 22 Neb. 186 , 34 N. W. 351 ; Town of Woodville v. Harrison, 73 Wis. 360 , 41 N. W. 529 ; Lowry v.

Casey v. Kitchens

66 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1917

McDonald v. Stiles, 7 Okla. 327 , 54 Pac. 487 ; Cope v. Braden, 11 Okla. 291 , 67 Pac. 475 ; McClung v. Penny, 11 Okla. 474 , 69 Pac. 499 ; Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 225 ; Hack v. … Cahill v. Pine Creek Oil Co., 38 Okla. 568 , 134 Pac. 64 ; Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 1049 ; Olds v. Conger, 1 Okla. 232 , 32 Pac. 337 ; Conaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 127 ; Burdette v.

Bowles v. Perkinson

85 Okla. 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1922

Cases upon this question are reviewed in the case of Bodine v. McDaniel Auto Co., 69 Oklahoma 170 Pac. 899 , and Estus, County Clerk, v. State, 83 Okla. 181 , 200 Pac. 1002 ; Clark, State Highway Com’r, v. Warner, Co. … over the board in allowing claims.

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Davis Adm'rs

194 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942

Co. v. Washington, 176 Okla. 521 , 56 P. 2d 1190 ; Firemen’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Griffin, 176 Okla. 94 , 54 P. 2d 1032 . … Martin v. Jones et al., 111 Okla. 101 , 238 P. 458 ; Hill v. Bucy et al., 95 Okla. 275 , 219 P. 124 ; Parks et al. v. Haynes et al., 52 Okla. 63 , 152 P. 400 ; Hawkins v. Payne, 129 Okla. 243 , 264 P. 179 .

Phillips v. Freas

151 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1931

The assessment is not void because of the manner in which the property was listed. *228 In the case of Pentecost v. … Treas., v. Sawyer, 63 Okla. 155 , 163 P. 717 , this court said: “Under chapter 152, Sess.

National Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. Richards

111 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925

The first, second, third, and fourth propositions here presented are similar to corresponding propositions presented in National Surety Company v. … for the use and benefit of the board of county commissioners.

City of Tulsa v. Fred Jones Co.

203 Okla. 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1950

In Van Meter v. H. F. … In Oklahoma City v.