Case law

McArdle v. Stewart

446 P.2d 379 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1968

In Olmstead v. … J., IRWIN, V. C. J., and DAVIDSON, WILLIAMS, HODGES and LAVENDER, JJ., concur. BLACKBIRD, BERRY and McINER-NEY, JJ., dissent.

Ponca City Hospital, Inc. v. Murphree

545 P.2d 738 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1976

This was done following several hearings before the Board and before the Judicial Committee of the Hospital, and was reached by a unanimous vote of the Board. … Khoury v.

State ex rel. Hughes v. Riggs

313 P.2d 523 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1957

It is therefore plain that the board had neither the authority, nor any discretion, to allow plaintiff a pension of less than that amount. … They rely, for this contention, upon sec. 541 v (Title 11, supra), which is the section of the cited section that provides for appeals to the district court from decisions of such Boards.

Bridal v. Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. II

405 P.2d 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1965

Rogers v. … Setters v.

Herron v. McCurtain County Bldg. & Loan Ass'n

203 Okla. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1950

The defendants in error Lee Swarts and Birty Swarts were defendants below, as well as Travis Brown and Nora Brown and J. W. … In Martin v.

Starr v. Haygood

53 Okla. 358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

On appeal to this court from a judgment of the county court of Muskogee county supersedeas bond was filed, executed by plaintiffs in error, Burrell Starr and Mun Brown, as principals, and J. M. … Long v. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342 , 152 Pac. 1078 , and cases there cited. Judgment was rendered in the trial court on June 3, 1912, in the sum of $75, and costs; and it is provided by section 1008, Rev.

Dierks Forests, Inc. v. Richards

414 P.2d 273 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1966

Petitioner cites Brown Bros. v. Parks, 176 Okl. 615 , 56 P.2d 883 ; and Texas Co. v. Atkinson, 178 Okl. 480 , 62 P.2d 1204 , as being controlling of the issues in this case. … However, petitioner misconstrues the Brown case, supra. There the claimant’s total disability was brought about by epilepsy and not from the injury. In Texas Company v.

Thompson v. Chamblee

206 Okla. 602 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1952

El Kouri v. Toma, 200 Okla. 354 , 194 P. 2d 872 . … Butler, Mart Brown, and Merton Bulla, who as Special Masters aided in the preparation of this opinion.

Hughes Land Co. v. Bailey

30 Okla. 194 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

During the year 1904, Charley McNac, while seised of said premises in fee, died intestate, leaving surviving him his two daughters, Pauline Bailey, nee McNac, and Polly Brown, nee McNac, defendants in error. … The opinion of this court in Lamb v. Baker, 27 Okla. 739 , 117 Pac. 189 , establishes the law of this case.

Severns Paving Co. v. Oklahoma City

158 Okla. 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1932

Brown, 87 U. S. 289 , 20 Wall. 289, 310, 311 , 22 L. Ed. 264, 268 , and Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341 , 24 L. Ed. 659 . … The allowance of damages now to Brown & Oo. will be no defense to a claim for the whole face of the bond, to be made by the holder of it.

Culbertson v. Walton Trust Co.

49 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

BROWN, J. … Sheil v. Winters, 45 Okla. 525 , 146 Pac. 220 ; Kirkland v. Trezevant, 38 Okla. 445 , 134 Pac. 1198 ; Skirvin v. Goldstein, 40 Okla. 315 , 137 Pac. 1176 ; Skirvin v. Bass Fur. & Car.

Independent School Dist. No. 66 v. Dependent School Dist. No. 62

259 P.2d 826 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1953

See Petitioners of School District No. 9, Caddo County v. Jones, 193 Okl. 9 , 140 P.2d 922 ; Ensley v. Goins, 192 Okl. 587 , 138 P.2d 540 . … Under the statute above quoted it was the mandatory duty of the State Board of.

Phillips v. Phillips

556 P.2d 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1976

Roemer v. Roemer, Okl., 373 P.2d 55 (1962). … HODGES, V. C. J., dissents. 1 . “Then, gentlemen, I think I am ready to announce judgment in this case.

Seltzer v. Commissioners of Land Office

258 P.2d 1172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1953

Donaldson v. Hines, 163 Kan. 300 , 182 P.2d 865 , and Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board, 31 Cal.2d 401 , 189 P.2d 17 , 3 A.L.R.2d 90 . … Board of University and School Lands, 21 N.Dak. 212, 129 N.W. 1029 ; State ex rel. White v. Board of State Land Com’rs, 23 Wash. 700 , 63 P. 532 ; U. S. v. Williams, 6 Mont. 379 , 12 P. 851 .

Young v. Town of Morris

47 Okla. 743 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1915

that time, considered marshal of the town by the board of trustees. … Lee v.

Oklahoma City v. Brient

189 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1941

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co., 182 Okla. 91 , 76 P. 2d 389 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Giddings, 159 Okla. 103 , 14 P. 2d 418 ; Walker-Taylor Co. v. … Cooper v. King, 171 Okla. 121 , 42 P. 2d 249 .

Northeast Oklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. State ex rel. Corporation Commission

62 O.B.A.J. 938 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1991

that a “final contract” had been executed between GRDA and the Board. … Westingkouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth., supra note 7 at 720; Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan Auth., supra note 6 at 315-316; Peppers Refining Co. v.

American Bank & Trust Co. v. Frensley

167 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1934

Tivis, 91 Okla. 189 , 217 P. 163 ; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Harmon, 92 Okla. 167 , 218 P. 682 ; Board of Education v. First Nat. Bank, 96 Okla. 275 , 219 P. 98 ; Dugan v. … S. *537 Fidelity, etc., v. Harmon, supra; Good v. Bank, 88 Okla. 110 , 211 P. 1051 ; Gressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 P. 417 ; Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. Smith, 09 Okla. 261 , 160 P. 898 ; Engle v.

Tuttle v. Jefferson Power & Improvement Co.

31 Okla. 710 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1912

In Brown v. Gerald, 100 Me. 351 , 61 Atl. 785 , 70 L. R. A. 472, 109 Am. St. … v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. McIntosh

103 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1924

the estimate of the executive board of the county fair association.” . … Louis-San *248 Francisco Railway Company v. Caldwell, 75 Okla. 153 , 182 Pac. 688 . In that case the county excise board had made a levy of tht full statutory limitation, of four mills for current expenses.