Case law

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Henderson

167 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1934

In Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, Co. … Co. v. McIntosh, Co.

Wright v. Jacobs

12 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 2, 1902

This was announced in the case of Beatty v. Walker, 1 Okla. 183 . … Ross v. Baxter, 35 Pa.

Consolidated School District No. 41 v. Dacus

189 Okla. 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1941

Common School District No. 49 v. Wolfe, 94 Okla. 87 , 221 P. 42 ; School District No. 65 of Payne County v. Board of Commissioners of Payne County, 148 Okla. 5 , 296 P. 483 ; School District No. 9 of Tulsa County v. … Musick v. State ex rel. Miles, supra; Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, supra.

Protest of Carter Oil Co.

148 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1931

The protestee quotes from Eaught v. … X, CLARK, V. C. X, and HEPNER and LANGLEY, JX, absent.

Ferk v. Hall

119 Okla. 251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1926

The case of Campbell v. … In the case of State v.

Ponca City v. Edwards

138 Okla. 106 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1929

The bonds required by the board to be executed by the contractor shall he executed by such contractor to whom the work may be let together with one corporate surety acceptable to said board, which shall be a surety company … The plaintiffs in error lay great stress on the ease of Wheeler v.

Sand Springs Railway Co. v. City of Tulsa

339 P.2d 787 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1959

City of Lawton v. Akers, Okl., 333 P.2d 520 . … Roberts v. Richland Irr. Dist., supra. Judgment affirmed.

In Re Little Nick Oil Co.

187 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1940

The drilling rig had not been assessed previously by the board. It was not included in the return of Little Nick to the board. … We think the board’s finding in this respect is sustained by the weight of the evidence. The assessment of $5,000 is vacated, and the cause remanded. WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Davis Adm'rs

194 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942

Co. v. Washington, 176 Okla. 521 , 56 P. 2d 1190 ; Firemen’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Griffin, 176 Okla. 94 , 54 P. 2d 1032 . … Martin v. Jones et al., 111 Okla. 101 , 238 P. 458 ; Hill v. Bucy et al., 95 Okla. 275 , 219 P. 124 ; Parks et al. v. Haynes et al., 52 Okla. 63 , 152 P. 400 ; Hawkins v. Payne, 129 Okla. 243 , 264 P. 179 .

Butler v. Prokop

321 P.2d 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1958

He also cites Hubbard v. … Co. v.

Pottawatomie County v. Alexander

68 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1918

See, also, Mok v. Detroit Bldg. & Sav. Ass’n, 30 Mich. 511 ; Bush v. Indianapolis, 120 Ind. 476 , 22 N. E. 422 . … Ass’n, 23 Kan. 499 ; Hicks v. Davis, State Auditor, 97 Kan. 312 , 154 Pac. 1030 : Board of Commissioners v. Aspen Min. & Smalt. Co., 3 Colo.

Louis v. Alton Metal Products Company

409 P.2d 353 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 1965

In support of his position he cites Sharp v. Redco Corporation, Okl., 355 P.2d 856 ; Tillery & Jones v. Sigler, Okl., 265 P.2d 484 ; Midland Co-Op Wholesale et al. v. … Brown, 207 Okl. 441 , 250 P.2d 34 ; and Socony Mobil Oil Company v. Cox, Okl., 372 P.2d 8 . In Sharp v. Redco Corporation, supra, Tillery & Jones v.

In Re Fleming

167 Okla. 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1934

Sec State Bar of Oklahoma v. McGhee, 148 Okla. 219 , 298 P. 580 , and In re Tillman, 157 Okla. 166 , 11 P. (2d) 511 . … Selling et al. v. Radford, 243 U. S. 46 , 61 L.

Bailey & Collins v. Ryan Cotton Oil Mill Co.

119 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1926

Brown receivers of the Ryan Ootton Oil Company in the case of the Oklahoma National Bank of Chickasha, Okla., v. … Co. v.

In re Oklahoma County Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 3

202 Okla. 64 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1949

that the board of county commissioners appointed as the board of directors for the sewer improvement district, W. … J., ARNOLD, V. C. J., and CORN, LUTTRELL, HALLEY, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

Frost v. Blockwood

408 P.2d 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1965

In this connection, see Bates v. Hanks, 262 Ky. 556 , 90 S.W.2d 743 ; Brown v. Crossmann, 204 N.Y. 238 , 97 N.E. 526 ; Jackson v. … Guy, 165 Old. 156, 25 P.2d 625 ; and Bailey v. Brown, 166 Okl. 5 , 25 P.2d 1088 .

Byrd v. State Ex Rel. Roff

99 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Eldridge, supra, and cites the case of Bartlett et al. v. … of education of the town of Eoraker, and that the entire membership of said board was now vacant.

St. Louis S. F. R. v. Travelers' Corp. of Oklahoma

47 Okla. 374 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1915

Co. v. State et al., 23 Okla. 210 , 100 Pac. 11 , 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 908; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. State et al., 23 Okla. 510 , 101 Pac. 262 ; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. … Co. v. State et al., 24 Okla. 370 , 103 Pac. 617 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 393; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Newell et al., 25 Okla. 502 , 106 Pac. 818 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v.

Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 2 of Garfield Cty. v. Beeson

30 Okla. 802 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1911

In Moore v. … See Gilmore v. Fox, 10 Kan. 509 ; Hays v. Hill, 17 Kan. 360 ; Voss v. School District, 18 Kan. 471 ; 30 Cyc. 40.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Wood

126 Okla. 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1927

Co. v. Swirtz. 13 Okla. 411 , 73 Pac. 941 ; Fretz v. City of Edmond, 66 Okla. 262 . 168 Pac. 800 . … Co. v.