Case law

Bailey & Collins v. Ryan Cotton Oil Mill Co.

119 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1926

Brown receivers of the Ryan Ootton Oil Company in the case of the Oklahoma National Bank of Chickasha, Okla., v. … Co. v.

Frost v. Blockwood

408 P.2d 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1965

In this connection, see Bates v. Hanks, 262 Ky. 556 , 90 S.W.2d 743 ; Brown v. Crossmann, 204 N.Y. 238 , 97 N.E. 526 ; Jackson v. … Guy, 165 Old. 156, 25 P.2d 625 ; and Bailey v. Brown, 166 Okl. 5 , 25 P.2d 1088 .

Fraternal Order of Police No. 165 v. City of Choctaw

933 P.2d 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1997

The arbitration board heard the remaining issues on September 20, 1994 and rendered its decision on October 14, 1994. The board accepted the “last best offer” of the FOP. … We do not find persuasive the cities’ reliance on City of Ardmore v. Excise Board, 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).

Salter v. Overstreet, County Treasurer

53 Okla. 303 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1916

The question again came before the court in Board of Co. Com’rs of Logan County v. … Again, in Board of Co. Com’rs v.

Byrd v. State Ex Rel. Roff

99 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Eldridge, supra, and cites the case of Bartlett et al. v. … of education of the town of Eoraker, and that the entire membership of said board was now vacant.

Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 2 of Garfield Cty. v. Beeson

30 Okla. 802 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1911

In Moore v. … See Gilmore v. Fox, 10 Kan. 509 ; Hays v. Hill, 17 Kan. 360 ; Voss v. School District, 18 Kan. 471 ; 30 Cyc. 40.

McClellan v. Ficklen

54 Okla. 745 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1916

error alleges in his petition that he was the owner of the real estate involved herein at the time of its assessment in the year of 1911; that it was properly assessed for said year, and its value equalized by the proper boards … Upon the authority of Carrico et al. v. Crocker et al., 38 Okla. 440 , 133 Pac. 181 , and the cases, therein cited, and also of Thompson et al. v. Brady et al., 42 Okla. 807 , 143 Pac. 6 , Rumph, Treas., v.

Independent School Dist. No. 66 v. Dependent School Dist. No. 62

259 P.2d 826 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1953

See Petitioners of School District No. 9, Caddo County v. Jones, 193 Okl. 9 , 140 P.2d 922 ; Ensley v. Goins, 192 Okl. 587 , 138 P.2d 540 . … Under the statute above quoted it was the mandatory duty of the State Board of.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Wood

126 Okla. 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1927

Co. v. Swirtz. 13 Okla. 411 , 73 Pac. 941 ; Fretz v. City of Edmond, 66 Okla. 262 . 168 Pac. 800 . … Co. v.

Woods v. City of Lawton

64 O.B.A.J. 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1992

The court of appeals reversed citing Board of Trustees v. … The exact question presented in this case has not been before us, although, we did consider in Board of Trustees v.

Huckins Hotel Co. v. Clampitt

101 Okla. 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1924

cause, by a public enemy, by the negligence of the owner, or by the act of someone whom he brought into the inn or boarding house; and upon such property the innkeeper or keeper of a boarding house has a lien and a right … Dickinson v. Winchester, 58 Mass. 114 ; Sasseen v. Clark, 37 Ga. 632 ; Coskery v. Nagle (Ga.) 10 S. E. 491 ; Williams V. Moore, 69 Ill. App. 618 : Giles v. Fauntleroy, 13 Md. 126 ; Maxwell v. Gerard, N. Y.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.

169 Okla. 648 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1934

The county excise board allocated to the municipalities in Custer county for the fiscal year of 1933-34 a levy of 3.5 mills. … This particular provision was declared unconstitutional and void in the case of State v. Morley, 168 Okla. 259 , 34 P. (2d) 258 .

TULSA STOCKYARDS, INC. v. CLARK

321 P.3d 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2014

Fund v. … Co. v.

Thompson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

194 Okla. 77 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1944

In Anderson-Kerr v. … In Cash v.

Cannon v. Cassidy

542 P.2d 514 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1975

Coal, Oil and Gas Co. v. Styron, Okl., 303 P.2d 965 (1956). … See, Robertson v. Maney, 196 Okl. 500 , 166 P.2d 106 (1946), and, Ionic Petroleum Limited v. Third Finance Corp., Okl., 411 P.2d 492 (1966).

Hirsh v. Twyford

40 Okla. 220 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1913

In Haskell v. … In Thomson v.

Jones v. Winters

365 P.2d 357 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1961

State Board of Equalization et al., 109 Mont. 52 , 96 P.2d 420, 422 , “This court has the power to declare a legislative Act invalid * * * ” In Jones v. … V, § 58).

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Rymer

187 P.3d 725 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 2008

The Colorado Supreme Court's order affirmed the Hearing Board's order of disbarment. … Bar Ass'n v. Henderson, 1999 OK 29, ¶ 4 , 977 P.2d 1096, 1098 .

Lohr & Trapnell v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.

77 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1919

In the case of Thompson v. … See State v. Wood, 51 Ark. 205 , 10 S. W. 624 ; Bay County v. Brook, 44 Mich. 45 , 6 N. W. 101 .

Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 54 of Lincoln Cnty. v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 67 of Payne Cnty.

418 P.3d 693 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 2018

Wyandotte County v. … In Board of Commr's of Carter County v. Joint Sch. Dist.