Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.33s

  • Jones v. Kennedy

    118 Okla. 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1926

    In Ryan, County Treasurer, v. … In Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, Co.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Jefferson v. British American Oil Producing Co.

    193 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1943

    GIBSON, V. C. J. … See, also, Oklahoma State Bank of Ada v. Mitchell, 179 Okla. 567 , 66 P. 2d 920 ; Rourke v. Myers, 184 Okla. 46 , 84 P. 2d 639 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULE 5 AND 8 OF DISCIPLINARY RULES OF STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS

    2023 OK 106 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 2023

    The Board may initiate a complaint upon its own motion. b) A complaint shall be filed with the Secretary of the Board, who shall transmit copies to all members of the Board. … Citationizer © Summary of Documents Citing This Document Cite Name Level Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 2023 OK 118 , UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS Cited Title 20.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Western Union Tel. Co.

    270 P.2d 314 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1954

    In Mobley v. … Mobley v. Brown, supra; Crown Drug Co. v. Hofstrom, 158 Okl. 27 , 12 P.2d 519 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Collins v. Lackey

    31 Okla. 776 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

    Browne on the Statute of Frauds, sec. 469. … Halsell et al. v. Renfrow, 14 Okla. 674 , 78 Pac. 118 , 2 Ann. Cas. 286; Id., 202 U. S. 287 , 26 Sup. Ct. 610, 50 L. Ed. 1032 , 6 Ann. Cas. 189; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, secs. 483-484; McNeill v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Kerr v. Hillenberg

    373 P.2d 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1962

    Cotner v. Warren, Okl., 330 P.2d 217 . *70 , Therefore, the leases involved continued •in force for a reasonable length of time. In Cotner v. … Lyons, he removed all of the equipment from the lease and pulled the pipe from existing wells, and thus, according to plaintiffs, the lease expired by its own terms under the authority of Brown v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • City of Tulsa v. Thomas

    89 Okla. 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1923

    Homestead Realty Co. v. Kobison, 39 Okla. 591 , 136 Pac. 585 ; United States v. Norris (C. C. A. 8th Cir.) 222 Fed. 14 ; Seneca v. Doss, 59 Okla. 149 , 158 Pac. 575 ; Leahy v. … Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co., 39 Okla. 312 , 135 Pac. 416 ; Baker v. Citizens’ State Bank of Okeene, 74 Oklahoma, 177 Pac. 568 ; Board of Equalization v. First State Bank, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • In Re Diehr

    174 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1935

    See, also, Board of Com’rs v. State Board of Equalization, 155 Okla. 183 , 8 P. (2d) 732 736 , and cases cited. … Be Gross Production Tax Wolverine Oil Co., supra; Board of Commissioners v. State Board of Equalization, supra, and cases there cited.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bliss Hotel Company v. Thompson

    378 P.2d 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1962

    Evansville *322 Mercantile Association v. … In commenting upon such valuation, this court said in Wilkin v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma City Bldg. Loan Ass'n v. Hinton

    169 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

    The case is almost exactly like that of Tolbert v. Chisholm, 163 Okla. 92 , 21 P. (2d) 16 . … Brown and Mr. P. W. Cress, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this court for examination and report to the court. Thereafter, upon consideration, this opinion was adopted.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Protest of Bendelari, Agent

    82 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1921

    Co. v. Harrison, 235 U. … the judgment of the State Board of Equalization is therefore affirmed.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Badger Oil & Gas Co. v. Preston

    49 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

    Unless a stated term is fixed in the contract of employment, undoubtedly such agent holds his agency subject to be terminated at the pleasure of the board of directors.” In Watson v. Gugine, 204 N. Y. 535 , 98 N. … C. 326; Parker v. Nickerson, 112 Mass. 195 ; Mt. Vernon Bank v. Porter, 148 Mo. 176 , 49 S. W. 982 ; Jackson v. Ludeling, 21 Wall. 616, 22 L. Ed. 492 ; Cook v. Sherman (C. C.) 20 Fed. 167 ; Bird Coal & Iron Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bailey & Collins v. Ryan Cotton Oil Mill Co.

    119 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1926

    Brown receivers of the Ryan Ootton Oil Company in the case of the Oklahoma National Bank of Chickasha, Okla., v. … Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Johnson, Co.

    85 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1922

    PITCHFORD, V. C. J. This action was commenced in the district court of Pawnee county, Okla., by plaintiff to recover of defendant taxes which it alleges were unlawfully levied against it and which it paid under protest. … There is nothing in the record showing that the excise board, in estimating the needs of the county, included any item for draggable roads.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Town of Burbank v. Sheel

    131 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1928

    This statute was construed and held to mean what it says in Bocox v. Town of Bixby, 114 Okla. 269 , 247 Pac. 20 , and in Edmonds v. … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. Town of Valley Brook

    487 P.2d 708 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1971

    In March, 1966, the Board by resolution levied assessment to pay cost of paving. In the case of Rudnicki et al. v. … City of Muskogee v. Borum, Okl., 375 P.2d 869 (1962) and Decker v. Ponca City, Okl., 361 P.2d 195 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Harlin

    393 P.3d 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2017

    Ellington v. Horwitz Enterprises, 2003 OK 37 , 68 P.3d 983 . This Court approves court rules and forms only as a matter of procedure. … See, e.g., Cornett v. Carr, 2013 OK 30, ¶ 13 , 302 P.3d 769, 773 (concluding that Rule 9(a) of the Rules of the District Courts directly conflicted with 12 O.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Variance of Schrader

    660 P.2d 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1983

    See also Banks v. City of Bethany, 541 P.2d 178 , (Okl.1975), and Nuchoils v. Board of Adjustment of Tulsa, 560 P.2d 556 , (Okl. 1977). … Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Puckett, 353 P.2d 4 (Okl.1960). Second, hardship must be peculiar to the particular piece of property.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Peed v. Gresham

    53 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 1916

    Monroe v. Beebe, 10 Okla. 581 , 64 Pac. 10 ; Board of Co. Com’rs v. State ex rel. Cobb, 31 Okla. 196 , 120 Pac. 913 ; Norris v. Cross, Secretary of State, 25 Okla. 287 , 105 Pac. 1000 ; Roberts v. … Finley v. Territory ex rel. Keys, 12 Okla. 621 , 73 Pac. 273 ; State ex rel. v. Cummings, 47 Okla. 44 , 147 Pac. 163 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Henderson

    167 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1934

    In Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, Co. … Co. v. McIntosh, Co.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.