Case law

Abraham v. Van Meter

303 P.2d 434 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1956

Aikens v. … Co. v. California E.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Goad

117 Okla. 129 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1926

And in Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 101 Okla. 151 , 224 Pac. 969 , this court said: “In the absence of legislative authority, the city has no power to assess and collect a tax at all.” See St. Louis. & S. F. R. Co. v. … Thompson, 35 Okla. 138 , 128 Pac. 685 ; Campbell et al. v. State, 23 Okla. 109 , 99 Pac. 778 ; Nelson v. Oklahoma City & N. W. Ry. Co., 24 Okla. 617 , 104 Pac. 42 .

Atkinson v. Halliburton Co.

66 O.B.A.J. 3195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1995

In Tate v. … Board of County Comm’rs of Oklahoma County, 312 P.2d 438 (Okla.1957).

Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. First Nat. Bank

171 Okla. 472 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1935

Treas., v. Board of Commissioners, 134 Okla. 253 , 273 P. 274 . … As the court said in the case of Board v.

Jones v. Kennedy

118 Okla. 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1926

In Ryan, County Treasurer, v. … In Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, Co.

City of Tulsa v. Thomas

89 Okla. 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1923

Homestead Realty Co. v. Kobison, 39 Okla. 591 , 136 Pac. 585 ; United States v. Norris (C. C. A. 8th Cir.) 222 Fed. 14 ; Seneca v. Doss, 59 Okla. 149 , 158 Pac. 575 ; Leahy v. … Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co., 39 Okla. 312 , 135 Pac. 416 ; Baker v. Citizens’ State Bank of Okeene, 74 Oklahoma, 177 Pac. 568 ; Board of Equalization v. First State Bank, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 .

Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Steel

141 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1929

Ellison v. Beannabia, 4 Okla. 347 , 46 Pac. 477 ; Purcell Cottonseed Oil Mills v. Bell, 7 Ind. Ter. 717, 104 S. W. 944 ; Smith v. Gillis, 51 Okla. 134 , 151 Pac. 869 . … Spring v. Major, 126 Okla. 150 , 259 Pac. 125 ; Stockwell v. Gee, 121 Okla. 207 , 249 Pac. 389 ; C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Hurst, 129 Okla. 1 , 263 Pac. 113 .

Stutsman v. State Ex Rel. Caldwell, County Attorney

58 Okla. 113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1916

See Hughes v. Board of Commissioners, 50 Okla. 410 , 150 Pac. 1029 ; Board of Commissioners v. Vaughan, 51 Okla. 609 , 152 Pac. 115 . … See Huntington v. Board of Commissioners, 44 Okla. 276 , 144 Pac. 385 ; Hamilton et al. v. Board of Commissioners, 44 Okla. 379 , 144 Pac. 386 ; Russell v. Board of Commissioners, 44 Okla. 301 , 144 Pac. 580 .

Allied Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Cunningham

355 P.2d 564 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1960

Co. v. Lyle, Okl., 288 P.2d 717 , 53 A.L.R.2d 682 ; American Ins. Co. of Texas v. Brown, 203 Okl. 407 , 222 P.2d 757 ; Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass’n v. Ramage, 293 Ky. 586 , 169 S.W.2d 624 ; 45 C.J.S. … Co. of Texas v. Brown, supra, defendant contended that plaintiff failed to bring his alleged disability within the coverage of the policy, as contended here.

In Re Assessment of Central Nat. Bank of Okmulgee

81 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1921

Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. King, 76 Okla. 316 , 185 Pac. 439 ; Morgan v. Board of County Com’rs, 59 Okla. 290 , 159 Pac. 514 ; Wills v. Buzbee, 42 Okla. 206 , 140 Pac. 1146 ; Cook v. … Cook, 79 Okla. 222 , 192 Pac. 215 ; Saxon v Hardin, 29 Okla. 17 , 118 Pac. 264 ; Parker v. Wadleigh, 43 Okla. 180 , 141 Pac. 781 ; Greco v. Kool Kola Co., 79 Okla. 120 , 191 Pac. 1036 .

Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Johnson, Co.

85 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1922

PITCHFORD, V. C. J. This action was commenced in the district court of Pawnee county, Okla., by plaintiff to recover of defendant taxes which it alleges were unlawfully levied against it and which it paid under protest. … There is nothing in the record showing that the excise board, in estimating the needs of the county, included any item for draggable roads.

State Ex Rel. Pollution Control Co. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.

532 P.2d 1386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1975

See Commonwealth v. Emmers, 221 Pa. 298 , 70 A. 762 (1908); Cooper v. State, 48 N.Y.S.2d 212 (Ct.Cl.1944); 32 A.L.R.3rd 215, 255. In Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. … Board of Governors of Registered Dentists v. Melton, 428 P.2d 205, 207 (Okl.1967). We believe the statute in question conforms with the standards of due process.

Town of Burbank v. Sheel

131 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1928

This statute was construed and held to mean what it says in Bocox v. Town of Bixby, 114 Okla. 269 , 247 Pac. 20 , and in Edmonds v. … Co. v.

Badger Oil & Gas Co. v. Preston

49 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

Unless a stated term is fixed in the contract of employment, undoubtedly such agent holds his agency subject to be terminated at the pleasure of the board of directors.” In Watson v. Gugine, 204 N. Y. 535 , 98 N. … C. 326; Parker v. Nickerson, 112 Mass. 195 ; Mt. Vernon Bank v. Porter, 148 Mo. 176 , 49 S. W. 982 ; Jackson v. Ludeling, 21 Wall. 616, 22 L. Ed. 492 ; Cook v. Sherman (C. C.) 20 Fed. 167 ; Bird Coal & Iron Co. v.

Morris v. Gray

37 Okla. 695 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1913

In Brown v. … While the order made in the instant case differs from that in Brown v.

Rural Water & Sewer District No. 4 v. Coppage

73 O.B.A.J. 1551 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 2002

Constitution and this Court's holding in Comanche County Rural Water District No. 1 v. … Auth. v. Creek Co. Rural Water Dist. No. 2, 861 F.2d 1211 (10th Cir.1988); City of Madison v. Bear Creek Water Ass'n, 816 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir.1987).

Wright & Edwards v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

68 O.B.A.J. 915 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1997

Employment Security Commission v. Board of Review, 914 P.2d 1088 (Okla.App.1996). See also, Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Okla. Employment Security Commission, 913 P.2d 1377 (Okla.App.1996). … We held, in Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v.

Fields v. Victor Building & Loan Co.

73 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1918

In the case of Adams v. Burke, 201 Ill. 395 , 66 N. … Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Rogers, 49 Okla. 67 , 148 Pac. 161 ; Burton v. Lithic Mfg. Co., 73 Ore. 605 , 144 Pac. 1151 ; Camden Land Co. v. Lewis, 101 Me. 78 , 63 Atl. 523 .

In re Harlin

393 P.3d 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2017

Ellington v. Horwitz Enterprises, 2003 OK 37 , 68 P.3d 983 . This Court approves court rules and forms only as a matter of procedure. … See, e.g., Cornett v. Carr, 2013 OK 30, ¶ 13 , 302 P.3d 769, 773 (concluding that Rule 9(a) of the Rules of the District Courts directly conflicted with 12 O.S.

Bateman v. Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn

459 P.2d 854 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1969

In Cosmo Construction Company v. … Nobles v. Crockett, Okl., 319 P.2d 1007 .