Case law

Del State Bank v. Salmon

548 P.2d 1024 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1976

The opinion adopts as the rule governing the parties that stated in Knapp v. … The National Life opinion also cites and quotes from Schonwald v.

Burns v. Slater

559 P.2d 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1974

The State Election Board is a State agency officially residing in Oklahoma County and any action against the Board must be brought in Okla *429 homa County. See, Department of Corrections v. … In Lubin v. Panish, 415 U.S. 709 , 94 S.Ct. 1315 , 39 L.Ed.2d 702 (1974), a California statute requiring all candidates to pay filing fees was struck down when challenged by an indigent candidate.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CALLICOAT

2016 OK 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 2016

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Complaint 8 - Brown's Grievance John Brown alleges that Respondent neglected and abandoned his civil matter, despite receiving a $1,200.00 fee, and failed to communicate with him regularly.

Peerson v. Mitchell

205 Okla. 530 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1950

V., and Hal Peerson were the owners or keepers of a brown and white spotted bird dog which was ill-tempered, mean, vicious, dangerous, and accustomed to attacking people, all of which was known to defendants; that during … Jaco v. Baker, supra; Bank of Williamsville v. Amherst Motor Sales, Inc., supra; Humphreys et al. v. Heller, supra; Beam v. Karaim, supre; Yackel v. Nys, supra. In Jaco v.

Hume v. Wyand

68 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1918

Education, Oklahoma City, v. … An examination of the later case (Smartt, Sheriff, v. Bd. Co.

Matter of Evinger

604 P.2d 844 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1979

Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) where the United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded the action of the Supreme Court of New Mexico in Schware v. … Board of Bar Examiners, 60 N.M. 304 , 291 P.2d 607 (1955).

Associated Builders & Contractors v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of Labor

628 P.2d 1156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1981

Brown v. Banking Board, Okl., 512 P.2d 166 (1973). II. … V.

Stocker v. Dempsey

78 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1920

No briefs having been filed within the extension of time granted, the cause is dismissed for want of prosecution Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10 Brown v. Thompson, 46 Okla. 446 , 149 Pac. 122 . OWEN, C.

Sweet v. Boyd

6 Okla. 699 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1898

In Sharp v. … (Railway v. Russell, 8 Kan. 558 ; Parker v. Challis, 9 Kan. 155 ; Smith v. Commissioners, 9 Kan. 296 ; City of Lawrence v. Killam, 11 Kan. 499 ; Challis v.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.

169 Okla. 648 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1934

The county excise board allocated to the municipalities in Custer county for the fiscal year of 1933-34 a levy of 3.5 mills. … This particular provision was declared unconstitutional and void in the case of State v. Morley, 168 Okla. 259 , 34 P. (2d) 258 .

State v. State Ex Rel.

142 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1930

This court in Holbert v. Patrick, 72 Okla. 25 , 177 P. 566 , held that: "Section 5238, Rev. … In the case of Nichols v. Lonsdale, 109 Okla. 59 , 234 P. 753 , this court later held that: "Section 782, C. O.

Pentagon Academy, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

74 O.B.A.J. 3303 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 2003

See, Dabney v. … Anson Corp. v.

Dahl v. Hughes

347 P.2d 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1959

II, Secs. 2, 6, 7 and 24; Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach, Fla., 96 So.2d 130 , 60 A.L.R.2d 1193 ; Oklahoma City v. Vetter, 72 Okl. 196 , 179 P. 473 , 4 A.L.R. 1009 ; Page v. … See Consolidated School District No. 1 v. Wright, 128 Okl. 193 , 261 P. 953 , 56 A.L.R. 152 ; Wright v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 1, 162 Okl. 110 , 19 P.2d 369 . The rule was applied in the case of Cox v.

Tradesmens Nat. Bank v. Harris

145 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1930

Co. v. … Bank of Tishomingo v.

Charlton v. State Bar of Oklahoma

171 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1934

That on February 24, 1932, in the case of White v. … That on June 29, 1931, in the ease of Butcher v.

Cornelius v. Frank

173 Okla. 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1935

A provision of similar import was under consideration in Walker et al. v. Brown, 43 Okla. 144 , 141 P. 681 , and this court there held that: "The phrase, 'prevented by law,’ as used in that part of section 8341, Rev. … In Blundell v.

Calvey v. Daxon

997 P.2d 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 2000

Anderson v. Ritterbusch, see note 11, infra. 11 . Fent v. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth., see note at 17 ¶ 2, infra; In re Initiative Petition No. 348, 1991 OK 110 , ¶3, 820 P.2d 772 ; Board of County Comm’rs v. … Matter of Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth., see note 27, supra; Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , ¶ 18, 833 P.2d 1218, 1229 . 32 .

Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Webb

46 Okla. 740 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1915

Co. v. Brown (No. 4043) ante, 148 Pac. 1040 , and the holding of the court in' the instant case is the same as in that case. The judgment of the trial court should be accordingly reversed and remanded.

Jones v. Bennett

40 Okla. 664 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1914

Co. v. Washington, 49 Fed. 347 , 1 C. C. A. 286 . … Brown v. Brown, 71 Neb. 200 , 98 N. W. 718 , 115 Am. St. Rep. 568 , 8 Ann. Cas. 632; Palmer v. Hartford Dredging Co., 73 Conn. 182 , 47 Atl. 125 ; Fidelity, etc., Co. v. Nisbit, 119 Ga. 316 , 46 S. E. 444 .

School District No. 71 v. Overholser

17 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1906

It is contended by the counsel for the defendants in error that after such buildings are erected by the- board of county commissioners,- and after they are turned over to the school board of the school district in which they … See Kingfisher Board of Education v.