Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

0.34s

  • Independent School District No. 8 of Comanche County v. Hunter

    414 P.2d 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1966

    Co. v. Quick, 68 Pa. 189, 200 ; Greenwich Coal & Coke Co. v. … Lee, Okl., 393 P.2d 515 ; Lahman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Red Rock Mental Health v. Roberts

    940 P.2d 486 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1997

    Union Indemnity Co. v. Sating, 166 Okl. 133 , 26 P.2d 217, 226, 228 (1933). See Board of Law Library Trustees v. State, Okl., 825 P.2d 1285, 1291 (1991); Spain v. Kemell, Okl., 672 P.2d 1162, 1164-1165 (1983); Bryan v. … Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., Old., 804 P.2d 1138, 1139 (1991); Brown & Root v. Dunkelberger, 196 Okl. 116 , 162 P.2d 1018, 1020 (1945) (overruled in part on other grounds by Tulsa Hotel v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Application of Bd. of Regents, Etc.

    595 P.2d 785 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1979

    Proceeds from sale of the 1979 Series Bonds is to complete Phase V of the steam and chilled water plant servicing the Health Sciences Center located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. … Phase V consists of expansion and improvement of the system.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Heard

    178 Okla. 461 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1936

    Co. v. … This court later followed the above case in the case of De Noya v. Fidelity Phoenix Ins.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • J. Brotton Corp. v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission

    62 O.B.A.J. 3758 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1991

    In Peterson v. … The ABLE Commission, and its predecessor, the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, have used their definition of the term “public school” since 1959. 10 In Oral Roberts Univ. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Yazel v. William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc.

    364 P.3d 1281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2014

    of Equalization (Board),. … Jones v. State of Oklahoma ex rel, Office of Juvenile Affairs, see note --, supra; King v. King, 2005 OK 4, 122 , 107 P.3d 570 , Fuller v. Odom, 1987 OK 64 , T4, 741 P.2d 449, 453 ; Darnell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Haas v. Holloman

    327 P.2d 655 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1958

    We held in Key County Election Board of Oklahoma County v. … In Roberts Board of Commissioners of Craig County v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

    162 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1933

    The protest is a collateral attack upon a judgment entered in the district court of Lincoln county in the case of Wilson v. Board of Education of the City of Stroud. … AYe think the pleadings and the findings of the district court of Lincoln county in Wilson v. Board of Education of Stroud, Okla., bring it within the rule announced in Re Protest of St.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ames v. Strain

    301 P.2d 641 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1956

    See also the interesting discussion in Brown v. … In this connection, see also Kaufman v. Brown, Cal. App., 209 P.2d 156 ; Brown v. Meier & Co., supra, and the Annotations beginning at 79 A.L.R. 13 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Del State Bank v. Salmon

    548 P.2d 1024 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1976

    The opinion adopts as the rule governing the parties that stated in Knapp v. … The National Life opinion also cites and quotes from Schonwald v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Germo Mfg. Co.

    173 Okla. 497 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

    No. 1, Kay Co., v. Poster Lbr. Co. … Protest of Wilhite, 150 Okla. 29 , 300 P. 779 : Hull v. Board *500 of Ed., 150 Okla. 30 , 300 P. 775 ; Protest of C., R. I. & P. R. Co., 156 Okla. 100 , 293 P. 539 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Burns v. Slater

    559 P.2d 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1974

    The State Election Board is a State agency officially residing in Oklahoma County and any action against the Board must be brought in Okla *429 homa County. See, Department of Corrections v. … In Lubin v. Panish, 415 U.S. 709 , 94 S.Ct. 1315 , 39 L.Ed.2d 702 (1974), a California statute requiring all candidates to pay filing fees was struck down when challenged by an indigent candidate.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Protest of Bledsoe

    161 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

    We held to the contrary, in Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 p. 423, and Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board, 141 Okla. 34 , 283 P. 1003 . … Co. v. Johnson, Co.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Merchants Mutual Bonding Co. v. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt

    438 P.2d 931 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1967

    In State v. Vending Mach. … State v. Vending Mach. Corporation of America, supra; see also Commonwealth v. Tillman, 322 Pa. 338 , 185 A. 639 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Peerson v. Mitchell

    205 Okla. 530 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1950

    V., and Hal Peerson were the owners or keepers of a brown and white spotted bird dog which was ill-tempered, mean, vicious, dangerous, and accustomed to attacking people, all of which was known to defendants; that during … Jaco v. Baker, supra; Bank of Williamsville v. Amherst Motor Sales, Inc., supra; Humphreys et al. v. Heller, supra; Beam v. Karaim, supre; Yackel v. Nys, supra. In Jaco v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hume v. Wyand

    68 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1918

    Education, Oklahoma City, v. … An examination of the later case (Smartt, Sheriff, v. Bd. Co.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Matter of Evinger

    604 P.2d 844 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1979

    Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) where the United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded the action of the Supreme Court of New Mexico in Schware v. … Board of Bar Examiners, 60 N.M. 304 , 291 P.2d 607 (1955).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Sweet v. Boyd

    6 Okla. 699 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1898

    In Sharp v. … (Railway v. Russell, 8 Kan. 558 ; Parker v. Challis, 9 Kan. 155 ; Smith v. Commissioners, 9 Kan. 296 ; City of Lawrence v. Killam, 11 Kan. 499 ; Challis v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hart Const. Co. v. Weaver

    201 Okla. 424 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1949

    In support of this contention they cite and rely upon the following cases: Oklahoma Leader Co. v. Wells, 147 Okla. 294 , 296 P. 751 ; National Biscuit Co. v. Lout, 179 Okla. 259 , 65 P. 2d 497 ; Turner v. … Clarksburg Paper Co. v. Roper, 196 Okla. 504 , 166 P. 2d 425 ; Carden Mining & Milling Co. v. Yost, 193 Okla. 423 , 144 P. 2d 969 ; Terminal Oil Mill Co. v. Younger, 188 Okla. 316 , 108 P. 2d 542 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • First American Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Industrial Finance Authority

    951 P.2d 625 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 3, 1998

    . * * *" [29] Board of County Com'rs of Muskogee County v. … Oklahoma Bar Association, 1968 OK 1 , 448 P.2d 301, 306 ; Wade v. Brown, 1973 OK 137 , 516 P.2d 526, 528 ; Campbell v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.