Case law

Anchor Steam Bottling Works v. Baumle

53 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1916

That being the case, no formal action of the board of directors was necessary, and, if it was, by attorning to plaintiff the board was properly presumed to have ratified the deed. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Chicago, R. … Y.) 553; Independent Brewing Co. v. Powers, 80 Ill. App. 471 ; German Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank, 59 Neb. 7 , 80 N. W. 48 ; Mobile, etc., Ry. Co. v. Owen, 121 Ala. 505 , 25 South. 612 ; St. Croix Lbr. Co. v.

Alsip v. City of Chandler

408 P.2d 512 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1965

In Driver v. … See also Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 178 Okl. 545 , 61 P.2d 693 , 62 P.2d 986 . The case of Dowler v. State ex rel.

Jack v. National Bank

17 Okla. 430 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1906

In Methven v. … , or to the board of county commissioners of the assignment to the bank.

State Ex Rel. Dunlop, State Treas. v. Cruce

31 Okla. 486 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1912

The leading case of this class is Sutherland v. Governor, 29 Mich. 320 , 18 Am. Rep. 89 . People ex rel. Broderick v. Morton, 156 N. Y. 136, 50 N. E. 791 , 41 L. R. A. 231, 66 Am. St. … In Betts v.

King v. State Ex Rel. O'reilly, Co. Atty.

83 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1921

The law also permits an appeal from the board of county commissioners to the district court, and from there to this court. ' This court, in the case of Woolsey v. … Counsel for defendant in error relied upon the ease of Board of County Commissioners of Grady County v. Davis (Kan.) 160 Pac. 581 ; Hovey v. Barker (Kan.) 26 Pac. 591 ; and County Attorney ex rel. Lewis *300 v.

In re Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

427 P.2d 429 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1966

In Crossett v. … See also Knox v. McMillan, Old., 272 P.2d 1040 .

Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett

71 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1919

Laws 1910; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla 711, 146 Pac. 707 , and cases cited. The appeal is dismissed.

State Ex Rel. Pollution Control Co. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.

532 P.2d 1386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1975

See Commonwealth v. Emmers, 221 Pa. 298 , 70 A. 762 (1908); Cooper v. State, 48 N.Y.S.2d 212 (Ct.Cl.1944); 32 A.L.R.3rd 215, 255. In Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. … Board of Governors of Registered Dentists v. Melton, 428 P.2d 205, 207 (Okl.1967). We believe the statute in question conforms with the standards of due process.

State Bar v. Retail Credit Ass'n

170 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1934

In Board v. … In Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v.

State Ex Rel. Gauntt v. Lasher

116 Okla. 273 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1926

Love v. Smith, 43 Okla. 231 , 142 Pac. 408 ; Ross et al. v. Hunter et al., 53 Okla. 423 , 157 Pac. 85 . … It is undisputed, as shown by plaintiff’s petition, that said six votes were duly certified to the election board. As held in Town of Grove v.

City of Idabel Ex Rel. Woodroof v. School District No. Five (5) of McCurtain County

434 P.2d 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1967

Blythe v. City of Tulsa, supra; Wilson v. City of Hollis, supra. … Wenner v. Mothersead, 129 Okl. 273 , 264 P. 816 ; Home-Stake Production Co. v. Board of Equal., etc., Okl., 416 P.2d 917 .

Chapman v. Draughons School of Business, Inc.

287 P.2d 903 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1955

Keaton v. Bonaparte, 174 Okl. 316 , 50 P.2d 404 .” Lairmore v. Board of County Com’rs, Okmulgee County, 200 Okl. 436 , 195 P.2d 762, 764 . The quoted rule has always been followed in this jurisdiction. … Smith v. Board of Com’rs, 26 Okl. 819 , 110 P. 669 ; Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okl. 784 , 124 P. 324 ; Fast v. Rogers, 30 Okl. 289 , 119 P. 241 ; Harris v. Smiley, 36 Okl. 89 , 128 P. 276 ; Turner v.

In Re Estate of McDade

95 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1923

Brown has gone over? … In Brown v.

Pentagon Academy, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

74 O.B.A.J. 3303 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 2003

See, Dabney v. … Anson Corp. v.

In Re Duncan

43 Okla. 691 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1914

Board of Com’rs of Kingfisher County v. Guaranty State Bank et al., 27 Okla. 736 , 117 Pac. 216 ; State et al. v. Cawthorn’s Estate, 31 Okla. 560 , 122 Pac. 522 ; Asher State Bank v. … Board of Commissioners of Pottawatomie County, 31 Okla. 145 , 120 Pac. 634 .

Johnson v. Stoval

44 Okla. 443 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

In the former opinion, we followed Barnard v. … Held reversible error, overruling Brown v. Yates, 24 Okla. 231 , 103 Pac. 667 .” In this case the court overruled the opinion in Brown v. Yates because it seemed to follow the case of Baldwin v. White (Tex. Civ.

Cox v. Dillingham

199 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1947

In Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. … In Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

RIDINGS v. MAZE

2018 OK 18 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 2018

Fanning v. … BROWN Discussed 2011 OK 72 , 258 P.3d 521 , SHULL v. REID Discussed 2012 OK 2 , 270 P.3d 155 , WILSON v. STATE ex rel. STATE ELECTION BOARD Discussed 1978 OK 27 , 575 P.2d 1374 , BREEDEN v. LEAGUE SERVICES CORP.

School District No. 84 v. Asher School Dist. No. 112

168 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1934

In the case of Nichols v. … In the case of Curtiss v.

Burton v. School Dist. No. 78

178 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1936

The school board made an estimate in the sum of $3,690 for teachers’ salaries for said term, and the excise board only allowed and approved the sum of $2,565. … Thomas, Plaintiff, v. School District No. 78, Osage County, Okla., Defendant, in which the court decreed that she was entitled to a judgment for the balance of her salary in the sum of $370.40.