Case law

Calkin v. Wolcott

182 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1937

In Brown v. … Brown v. Trent, supra; Driskell v. Quinn, supra.

Eason Oil Company v. Uhls

518 P.2d 50 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1974

The trial court was obligated to uphold the Board of Adjustment unless there clearly was an arbitrary or abusive exercise of discretion. As stated in Anderson-Kerr v. … Van Meter v.

Allison v. Massey

108 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1925

The said plaintiff in error did the acts necessary to qualify as a member of the board of county commissioners, and he and the defendant in error sat with the other two members of the board at one or more meetings in the … month of July,1923; but the board of county commissioners recognized neither.

Harper v. Kelly

29 Okla. 809 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

M., in the Chickasaw Nation known as the Brown pasture. … (Harding v. Gillette et al., 25 Okla. 199 , 107 Pac. 665 ; Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. et al. v. Baumhoff, 21 Okla. 503 , 96 Pac. 758 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v.

Denney v. Scott

63 O.B.A.J. 2793 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1992

They cite Roussel v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. … 1); 12 O.S.1981, §§ 2401 and 2402; Messler v.

State Ex Rel. Gauntt v. Lasher

116 Okla. 273 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1926

Love v. Smith, 43 Okla. 231 , 142 Pac. 408 ; Ross et al. v. Hunter et al., 53 Okla. 423 , 157 Pac. 85 . … It is undisputed, as shown by plaintiff’s petition, that said six votes were duly certified to the election board. As held in Town of Grove v.

Hunt v. Logan

390 P.2d 918 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1964

In the case of Aubrey v. … In the case of Board of Com’rs of Creek County v.

Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Bd. of Pottawatomie

168 Okla. 250 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1934

This is an appeal by Prairie Pipe Line Company, a corporation, et al. against the excise board of Pottawatomie county from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review. … CULLISON, V. C. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and BUSBY, JJ., concur. RILEY, C. J., and BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Chapman v. Draughons School of Business, Inc.

287 P.2d 903 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1955

Keaton v. Bonaparte, 174 Okl. 316 , 50 P.2d 404 .” Lairmore v. Board of County Com’rs, Okmulgee County, 200 Okl. 436 , 195 P.2d 762, 764 . The quoted rule has always been followed in this jurisdiction. … Smith v. Board of Com’rs, 26 Okl. 819 , 110 P. 669 ; Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okl. 784 , 124 P. 324 ; Fast v. Rogers, 30 Okl. 289 , 119 P. 241 ; Harris v. Smiley, 36 Okl. 89 , 128 P. 276 ; Turner v.

Moran v. State Ex Rel. Derryberry

534 P.2d 1282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1975

In State v. … In State v.

Quaker Oil & Gas Co. v. Jane Oil & Gas Co.

63 Okla. 234 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1917

Among them are Campbell et al. v. Seaman, 63 N. Y. 568 , 20 Am. Rep. 567 ; Penrhyn Slate Co. v. Granville Elec. & L. Co., 181 N. Y. 80 , 73 N. E. 566 , 2 Ann. Cas. 782; Godwin, Adm’x, v. … Co. v. Osgood. 26 Conn. 16 ; Chestatee Pyrites. Co. v. Cavenders Creek Gold Min. Co., 118 Ga. 255 , 45 S. E. 267 ; Eau Claire Dells Imp. Co. v. City of Eau Claire, 134 Wis. 548 , 115 N. W. 155, 159 ; Swan v.

In Re Assessment of St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

120 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1926

This is the full scope of the section and the limit of the power of the State Board of Equalization. Wolverton Hardware Co. v. Porter, Comanche County Treasurer, 61 Okla. 171 , 160 Pac. 906 ; Scott v. … Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee county et al., 100 Okla. 77 , 227 Pac. 448 ; Kramer v. Gypsy Oil Co., 68 Okla. 212 , 173 Pac. 802 . ' The order of the State Board of Equalization appealed from is reversed.

Sewell v. Reinhardt

203 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1950

In Derieg v. Board of Education of the Town of Carnegie, 202 Okla. 577 , 216 P. 2d 307 , we considered a somewhat similar situation. … In that case we cited with approval Rose v. Board of Directors of School District No. 94 of Miami County, Kansas, 162 Kan. 720 , 179 P. 2d 181 . We said: “In the case of Rose v.

Dunham v. Ardery

43 Okla. 619 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1914

People v. Los Angeles, 133 Cal. 338 , 65 Pac. 749 ; Bd. Com’rs v. State ex rel. Cobb, 31 Okla. 196 , 120 Pac. 913 ; Norris v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287 , 105 Pac. 1000 ; Montgomery v. State Elec. … Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Pet. 497, 599 , appx., 10 L. Ed, 559, 609; U. S. v. Black, 128 U. S. 40 , 9 Sup. Ct. 12, 32 L. Ed. 354 ; U. S. v. Guthrie, 17 How. 284 , 15 L. Ed. 102 ; Commissioners v.

Trapp v. Dykes

140 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1929

Silberschein v. U. S., 285 Fed. 397 ; Crawford v. Cassity, 78 Okla. 261 , 190 Pac. 412 ; Tripp v Board of Education (Kan.) 227 Pac. 345 ; Dixon County v. Field, 111 U. S. 83 , 28 L. Ed. 360 . … The Supreme Court of the United States, in the ease of Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock, 187 U.

Loftis v. School District No. 52

144 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1930

Stat. 1921) and a decision of this court (Board of Education v. Woodworth, 89 Okla. 192 , 214 Pac. 1077 ) are against them. … It is the contention of counsel for plaintiffs in error that in the case of Board of Education v. Woodworth, supra, only an interpretation of the statute was considered, and not its constitutionality.

Blythe v. City of Tulsa

172 Okla. 586 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1935

Board of Com’rs of Franklin County v. City of Ottawa, supra; City of St. John v. Board of Commissioners of Stafford County, supra. … AVe held in the case of Board of Com’rs of Stafford Co. v. First Nat.

In Re Purdy

166 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1933

0ULLIS10N, V. C. X W. C. Purdy was a member of the Oklahoma Bar. Mrs. Marie Listen preferred charges against W. O. Purdy, which said charges were heard by the local administrative committee of the State Bar. … The case is here for review of the order of the Board of Governors disbarring said W. C. Purdy.

Poley v. Browne

199 Okla. 416 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1947

Thomas, 130 Ga. 153 , 60 S.E. 461 ; Boyd v. Portland Elec. Co., 41 Ore. 336 , 68 P. 810 ; Charette v. Village L’Anse, 154 Mich. 304 , 117 N.W. 737 ; Denver Consol. Elec. Co. v. … Midland Oil Co. v. Thigpen (1924) 4 F. 2d 85 ; Spellman et al. v. Sherry, 181 Okla. 174 , 72 P. 2d 793 .

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Smith

41 Okla. 314 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1913

Co. v. Brown, 32 Okla. 483, 122 Pac. 136 . We have read the testimony very carefully, and fail to find any evidence tending to show any negligence on the part of the employees of the railway company. … Co. v. Brown, supra, the correct rule is that the railroad company is required to exercise only ordinary care to avoid injuring trespassing animals after they are discovered on or in dangerous proximity to the track.