Case law

Gilbert v. Welchel

162 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1933

Scott v. Woods Lumber Co., 86 Okla. 185 , 207 P. 449 . … Cohee v. Turner & Wiggins, 37 Okla. 778 , 132 P. 1082 .

Frost v. School Dist. No. 98

118 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1926

One of the members of the school board brought them in to me, but I don’t recall which member. Q. Of what school board? A. District No. 98. Q. And you don’t 'know which one it was? A. No, sir. Q. … Stewart v. Board of Education, 104 Okla. 141 , 230 Pac. 504 ; School Dist. No. 18, of Creek County v. Ferguson, 45 Okla. 680 , 146 Pac. 711 .

Nowata Oil Syndicate v. Commercial Nat. Bank

93 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1923

Wheeler v. McGuire, 86 Ala. 398 , 2 L. R. A. 808; United States v. Boyd, 5 How. 50 , 12 L. Ed. 36 ; *10 Pullman Co. v. … Meyers. 195 Ala. 397 , 70 South. 763 ; Mechem on Agency (2nd Ed.) rol. 1, secs. 255 and 298; The Texas Co. v. Quelquejeu, 263 Fed. 491 ; Mechem on Agency (2nd Ed.) rol. 1, sec. 743; Sloan v. Brown, 228 Pa. 495 , 139 Am.

In Re Visitation Rights of Fox

567 P.2d 985 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1977

The Kansas Supreme Court in Browning v. … Stark v. Watson, 359 P.2d 191 (Okl.1961). 3 . Browning v. Tarwater, 215 Kan. 501 , 524 P.2d 1135 (1974). 4 . In the Matter of Del Moral Rodriguez, 552 P.2d 397 (Okl.1976). 5 .

Hodges v. Schafer

23 Okla. 404 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1909

Chief Justice Kane in Conly v. … Co. v. Territory, 21 Okla. 329 , 97 Pac. 265 ; Freeman v. Board of Medical Examiners, 20 Okla. 610 , 95 Pac. 229 ; Burkhalter v. Smith, 20 Okla. 625 , 95 Pac. 241 , Harman v.

Ingram v. Chappell

127 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1927

See Kellogg v. School Dist. No. 10, 13 Okla. 285 . 74 Pac. 110 . … J., MASON, V. O. J., and HARRISON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, CLARK and RILEY, JJ., concur. Note. — See 37 Cyc. p.1199.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Tate

57 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

Co. v. … Smith v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 42 Okla. 577 , 142 Pac. 398 .”

Partee v. Cleveland Trinidad Paving Co.

70 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1918

In City of Muskogee v. Rambo, 40 Okla. 672 , 138 Pac. 567 , this court, through ¡Mr. Justice Kane, quoting from Perry v. … See City of Chickasha v. O’Brien, 58 Okla. 46 , 159 Pac. 282 ; City of Norman v. Allen, 47 Okla. 74 , 147 Pac. 1002 ; Grier v. Kramer, 62 Okla. 151 , 162 Pac. 490 ; City of Muskogee v.

Tinkelpaugh-Kimmel Hardware Co. v. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co.

20 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1908

Norman v. Phillips, 14 Mees. & W. 277; Hanson v. Armitage, 5 Barn. & Ald. 559; Maxwell v. Brown, 39 Me. 98 , 63 Am. Dec. 605 ; Johnson v. Cuttle, 105 Mass. 447 , 7 Am. Rep. 545 ; Grimes v. … Jamison v. Simons, 68 Cal. 17 , 8 Pac. 502 ; Stone v. Browning, 68 N. Y. 598 ; Shepherd v. Pressey, 32 N. H. 49; Dinnie v. Johnson, 8 N. D. 153 , 77 N. W. 612 ; Jones v.

Sumner Coal Mining Co. v. Pleasant

127 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

The powers of the corporation are exercised by and through its board of directors, and the property of the corporation is subject to the control of the board. Section 5334, C. O. S. 1921. … It was said -by the Supreme Court of Utah, in the ease of Gay v. Young Men’s Consolidated Co-Op.

Conoco, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC.

651 P.2d 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1982

by the Board. … Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Lawton, Okl., 523 P.2d 1064 [1974]. 38 . Matter of Estate of Bouse, Okl.App., 583 P.2d 514 [1978]. 39 . Board of County Commissioners v. City of Norman, Okl., 472 P.2d 910 [1970]. 40 .

Ballard v. Christian

451 P.2d 943 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1969

Board of Commissioners Creek County, 188 Okl. 184 , 107 P.2d 542 . The statute, 19 O.S.1961 § 321, providing for division of each county into three districts was construed in Wails v. … Commissioners rely upon Wails, supra, and Butler v. Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County, Okl., 413 P.2d *946 552, which adopted the reasoning in Wails.

Farmers Union Co-Operative Gin v. Hollis

151 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1931

In Katterhenry v. … Also, in Swindler v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Dickey

113 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

In the case of Oklahoma News Co. v. … Iln the case of Payne v.

Lone Star Helicopters, Inc. v. State

61 O.B.A.J. 2893 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1990

Whenever the terms “Board of Affairs", “State Board of Public Affairs", or "Board” when used in reference to the Board of Public Affairs, appear in the Oklahoma Statutes they shall mean the Office of Public Affairs or the … Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 312 P.2d 438, 439 (1957) (the court’s syllabus ¶ 1). 12 . Martin v. Harrah Independent School District, Okl., 543 P.2d 1370, 1372 (1976); Lincoln Income Life Insurance Co. v.

Clark v. Carter

86 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1922

With reference to the State Board of Public Affairs in this particular case, and in reference to the powers of the State Board of Affairs generally, there appears to be an unjustified confusion as to whether the Board of … Tulsa v. Purdy, 73 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 759 . This, in our opinion, is the law which governs this case.

Arnold v. McAuliffe

201 Okla. 639 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1949

Brown, St. Frauds, sec. 428; 1 Greenl. Ev. sec. 302; 2 Story, Eq. Jur. 770; Cummings v. Arnold, 3 Metc. (Mass.) 494; Faw v. Whittington, 72 N. C. 321 ; Miller v. Pierce, 104 N. C. 389 , 10 S. E. 554 ; Falls v. … Eq. 237; Banks v. Banks, 77 N. C. 186 ; Herren v. Rich, 95 N. C. 500 ; Holden v. Purefoy, 108 N. C. 167 , 12 S. E. 848 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 112 N. C. 27 , 16 S. E. 924 ; Fortune v. Watkins, 94 N. C. 304 . In McDougald v.

Humphries v. Lewis

67 P.3d 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 2003

Brown, 1999 OK 79 , " 22 n. 30, 989 P.2d 448 , 456 n. 30. The third issue is a question of fact which we review for abuse of discretion. … Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff's FOP v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 1988 OK 44, 113 , 959 P.2d 979, 981 . Here, the two statutes are not in conflict-they are harmonious.

Mantooth v. Colbert

178 Okla. 395 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1936

Davis v. Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County, 45 Okla. 284 , 137 P. 114 . … S. 1931; Davis v. Board of Commissioners, supra: Norman v. Allen, 47 Okla. 74 , 147 P. 1002 : Arnold v. City of Tulsa, 38 Okla. 129 , 132 P. 660 .

Myers v. State

137 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1929

In Adair v. State, 15 Okla. … Section 2407, Id., was under consideration by this court in McCasland v. Board of County Commissioners, 126 Okla. 103, 258 .