Case law

Ingram v. Chappell

127 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1927

See Kellogg v. School Dist. No. 10, 13 Okla. 285 . 74 Pac. 110 . … J., MASON, V. O. J., and HARRISON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, CLARK and RILEY, JJ., concur. Note. — See 37 Cyc. p.1199.

Halstead v. McHendry

566 P.2d 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1977

Freeling v. Ross, 76 Okl. 11 , 183 P. 918 (1919); State ex rel. West v. Cobb, 24 Okl. 662 , 104 P. 361 (1909). … Morrison v. Ardmore Industrial Development Corp., Okl., 444 P.2d 816 (1963). Morrison, supra, cited an earlier decision of this Court [Woodward v.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Davis

37 Okla. 340 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1913

Brown v. Ghicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 54 Wis. 342 , 11 N. W. 356, 911 , 41 Am. Rep. 41 ; Kreuziger v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 73 Wis. 158 , 40 N. W. 657 ; Haverly v. State Line & S. R. … East Tenn., V. & G. R. Co. v. Lockhart, 79 Ala. 315 ; L. & N. Rail *347 road Co. v. Dancy, 97 Ala. 338 , 11 South, 796 ; Case v. Delaware, L. & W. Ry. Co., 191 Pa. 450 , 43 Atl. 319 ; Brown v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Tate

57 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

Co. v. … Smith v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 42 Okla. 577 , 142 Pac. 398 .”

Powell v. State Industrial Commission

208 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1953

The board, referring to the board claimant said struck his feet, had blown around and claimant was standing “kind of” on the board. This board was placed over a depression underneath the press. William W. … Johnson v. Ben Franklin Ref. Co., 194 Okla. 347 , 151 P. 2d 428 ; Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syn., 179 Okla. 382 , 65 P. 2d 976 ; Hollis v. Mid-Continent Pet. Corp., 174 Okla. 544 , 51 P. 2d 498 ; Souder v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Dickey

113 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

In the case of Oklahoma News Co. v. … Iln the case of Payne v.

Seldon Construction Co. v. Dowell

187 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

Stephenson - Browne Lumber Company intervened and asked judgment for $1,092.65 and attorney’s fees and costs, and Ellison Plumbing & Heating Company also intervened, asking judgment in the sum of $515 and attorney’s fees … Wetzel v. Rixse, 93 Okla. 216 , 220 P. 607 ; Sand Springs R. Co. v. Smith, 84 Okla. 211 , 203 P. 207 ; Garrison Coal Co. v. Semple, 82 Okla. 60 , 198 P. 497 . The judgment is affirmed. BAYLESS, C.

Wallace v. Bullen

9 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1898

The supreme'court of Ohio, in Chamberlin v. City of Cleveland, 84 Ohio, 551; of Iowa, in two cases, Royce v. Jenney, 50 Iowa 679, Harney v. Board, 44 Iowa 203; the supreme court of Wisconsin, in Kelly v. … Co. v. Wasco Co., 2 Oregon, 206; the supreme court of California, in Patten v. Green, 13 Cal. 329; People v. Reynolds, 28 Cal. 113, and Wells-Fargo Co. v.

State ex rel. Campbell v. Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars in U.S. Currency

184 P.3d 1078 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 2008

Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. … United States, 509 U.S. 602, 609-610 , 113 S.Ct. 2801 , 125 L.Ed.2d 488 (1993) (quoting Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 265 , 109 S.Ct. 2909 ).

Arnold v. McAuliffe

201 Okla. 639 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1949

Brown, St. Frauds, sec. 428; 1 Greenl. Ev. sec. 302; 2 Story, Eq. Jur. 770; Cummings v. Arnold, 3 Metc. (Mass.) 494; Faw v. Whittington, 72 N. C. 321 ; Miller v. Pierce, 104 N. C. 389 , 10 S. E. 554 ; Falls v. … Eq. 237; Banks v. Banks, 77 N. C. 186 ; Herren v. Rich, 95 N. C. 500 ; Holden v. Purefoy, 108 N. C. 167 , 12 S. E. 848 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 112 N. C. 27 , 16 S. E. 924 ; Fortune v. Watkins, 94 N. C. 304 . In McDougald v.

Tinkelpaugh-Kimmel Hardware Co. v. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co.

20 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1908

Norman v. Phillips, 14 Mees. & W. 277; Hanson v. Armitage, 5 Barn. & Ald. 559; Maxwell v. Brown, 39 Me. 98 , 63 Am. Dec. 605 ; Johnson v. Cuttle, 105 Mass. 447 , 7 Am. Rep. 545 ; Grimes v. … Jamison v. Simons, 68 Cal. 17 , 8 Pac. 502 ; Stone v. Browning, 68 N. Y. 598 ; Shepherd v. Pressey, 32 N. H. 49; Dinnie v. Johnson, 8 N. D. 153 , 77 N. W. 612 ; Jones v.

Lone Star Helicopters, Inc. v. State

61 O.B.A.J. 2893 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1990

Whenever the terms “Board of Affairs", “State Board of Public Affairs", or "Board” when used in reference to the Board of Public Affairs, appear in the Oklahoma Statutes they shall mean the Office of Public Affairs or the … Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 312 P.2d 438, 439 (1957) (the court’s syllabus ¶ 1). 12 . Martin v. Harrah Independent School District, Okl., 543 P.2d 1370, 1372 (1976); Lincoln Income Life Insurance Co. v.

Anadarko Funeral Home v. Scarth

173 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1935

Gentis v. Hunt, 121 Okla. 71 , 247 P. 358 ; Buxton & Skinner Stationery Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Craig County, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 P. 215 , and cases cited. … In a recent opinion, Board of Com’rs of Okmulgee County v.

Mathews v. State Ex Rel. Williamson

186 Okla. 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1939

In this connection we are cited to the case of Kreiser v. … of the board.

O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of Ryan

32 Okla. 738 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

Board of Education of Sapulpa v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 588 , 110 Pac. 907 ; Board of Education of Ardmore v. State ex rel., 26 Okla. 366 , 109 Pac. 563 ; North v. McMahon, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 1115 . … McMahon, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 1115 ; Board of Education of Sapulpa v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 588 , 110 Pac. 907 ; Board of Education of Ardmore v. State ex rel., 26 Okla. 366 . 109 Pac. 563 ; Riley v.

In Re Gypsy Oil Co.

141 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

In Pitts v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee, 138 Okla. 284 , 281 Pac. 133 , this court said: “Every municipality must submit its budget to the excise board of their respective counties. City of Sapulpa v. … Schulte v. Board of County Commissioners, 119 Okla. 261 , 250 Pac. 123 . The question then arises as to the effect of the funding- judgments.

City of Hugo v. Nance

39 Okla. 640 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1913

City of Detroit v. Corey, 9 Mich. 165 [ 80 Am. Dec. 78 ]; Nashville v. Brown [9 Heisk. (Tenn.) 1], 24 Am. Rep. 289 . … In Park v. Board, 3 Ind. App. 536 , 30 N.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Saylor

72 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1919

Doneghey, 71 Okla. 204 , 177 Pac. 86 , the rule announced in Brown v. Wilson, supra, was in express terms overruled. Justice Miley, delivering- the opinion of the court, said: “In Brown v. … Case [ 53 Okla. 748 , 157 Pac. 710 ] and Brown v.

Dunham v. Ardery

43 Okla. 619 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1914

People v. Los Angeles, 133 Cal. 338 , 65 Pac. 749 ; Bd. Com’rs v. State ex rel. Cobb, 31 Okla. 196 , 120 Pac. 913 ; Norris v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287 , 105 Pac. 1000 ; Montgomery v. State Elec. … Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Pet. 497, 599 , appx., 10 L. Ed, 559, 609; U. S. v. Black, 128 U. S. 40 , 9 Sup. Ct. 12, 32 L. Ed. 354 ; U. S. v. Guthrie, 17 How. 284 , 15 L. Ed. 102 ; Commissioners v.

Noble State Bank v. Haskell

22 Okla. 48 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1909

In the case of Matthews v. Board of Corporation Commissioners (C. … Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch, 128 , 3 L. Ed. 162 ; Higgins v. Brown, 20 Okla. 355 , 94 Pac. 703 ; City of Pond Creek et al v. C. N. Haskell et al., 21 Okla. 711 , 97 Pac. 338 . In the case of State v.