Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

0.78s

  • Fennell v. Lannom

    46 Okla. 519 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1915

    Wiedwall v. Dodson, 95 Cal. 450 , 30 Pac. 580 . (Id.) “Sec. 8176. … State v. Dunson, 71 Tex. 65 , 9 S. W. 103 . Where an attempted dissolution is void, acquiescence and lapse of time *525 are not sufficient. Largen v. State, 76 Tex. 323 , 13 S. W. 161 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Denney v. Scott

    63 O.B.A.J. 2793 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1992

    They cite Roussel v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. … 1); 12 O.S.1981, §§ 2401 and 2402; Messler v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Sulphur v. State Ex Rel. Lankford, Bank Com'r

    62 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1916

    See Hubbell v. Hutchinson, 64 Kan. 645 , 68 Pac. 52 ; Howard v. City, 33 Wis. 309 ; Board v. Oliver, 7 Colo. App. 515 , 44 Pac. 362 ; Board v. Sherwood, 64 Fed. 103 , 11 C. C. A. 507 . See, also, School District v. … This court in the case of Board v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Tiger v. Wildman

    116 Okla. 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1926

    See Woodward v. DeGraffenreid, 238 U. S. 284 ; Reynolds v. Fewell, 236 U. S. 58 ; Barnett v. Way, 29 Okla. 784 , 119 Pac. 418 ; Childers v. Samuels, 107 Okla. 169 , 232 Pac. 103 . … To the same effect are the cases of Tiger v. Drumright, 95 Okla. 174 , 217 Pac. 453 ; Ross v. Groom. 90 Okla. 270 , 217 Pac. 480 ; Atkinson v. King, 93 Okla. 37 , 219 Pac. 914 ; Burris v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Davis

    37 Okla. 340 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1913

    Brown v. Ghicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 54 Wis. 342 , 11 N. W. 356, 911 , 41 Am. Rep. 41 ; Kreuziger v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 73 Wis. 158 , 40 N. W. 657 ; Haverly v. State Line & S. R. … East Tenn., V. & G. R. Co. v. Lockhart, 79 Ala. 315 ; L. & N. Rail *347 road Co. v. Dancy, 97 Ala. 338 , 11 South, 796 ; Case v. Delaware, L. & W. Ry. Co., 191 Pa. 450 , 43 Atl. 319 ; Brown v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. State

    204 Okla. 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1951

    We have heretofore held to the contrary in State v. Adams, 187 Okla. 673 , 105 P. 2d 416 . … Oklahoma State Highway Commission v. Horn, 187 Okla. 605 , 105 P. 2d 234 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State Ex Rel. Cole, Co. Atty.

    47 Okla. 682 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1915

    BROWN, J. … Skelton v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dilliner v. Seneca-Cayuga Tribe

    258 P.3d 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 2011

    The Sixth Cireuit has held that a waiver of sovereign immunity clause in a tribal corporation's contract was insufficient without approval of the board by resolution, as required by tribal law. Memphis Biofuels LLC v. … Tribal law required approval of the board of directors to waive sovereign immunity and, without board approval, CNI's sovereign immunity remained intact. 585 F.3d at 922 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Quaker Oil & Gas Co. v. Jane Oil & Gas Co.

    63 Okla. 234 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1917

    Among them are Campbell et al. v. Seaman, 63 N. Y. 568 , 20 Am. Rep. 567 ; Penrhyn Slate Co. v. Granville Elec. & L. Co., 181 N. Y. 80 , 73 N. E. 566 , 2 Ann. Cas. 782; Godwin, Adm’x, v. … Co. v. Osgood. 26 Conn. 16 ; Chestatee Pyrites. Co. v. Cavenders Creek Gold Min. Co., 118 Ga. 255 , 45 S. E. 267 ; Eau Claire Dells Imp. Co. v. City of Eau Claire, 134 Wis. 548 , 115 N. W. 155, 159 ; Swan v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • City of Oklahoma City v. Lacy

    336 P.2d 906 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1959

    The members of Forest Park’s Board of Trustees and Oklahoma County’s Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter referred to collectively merely as “Trustees”, first filed a motion to dismiss the within cause here, on the … McFadyen v. Holtzclaw, 151 Okl. 163 , 2 P.2d 1022, 1023 , which was also commenced as an action in the nature of quo warranto.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Protest of Bledsoe

    161 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

    We held to the contrary, in Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 p. 423, and Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board, 141 Okla. 34 , 283 P. 1003 . … Co. v. Johnson, Co.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Straughn v. Berry

    179 Okla. 364 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1937

    McGrath v. Oklahoma City, 156 Okla. 34 , 9 P. (2d) 711 ; Nelson v. Pitts, 126 Okla. 191 , 259 P. 533 , 53 A. L. R. 1137; Moore v. Otis (C. C. A. 8th) 275 Fed. 747 . In the case of Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. … Peake v. City of New Orleans, 139 U. S. 342 , 11 S. Ct. 541 , 35 L. Ed. 131 ; City of New Orleans v. Warner, 175 U. S. 120 , 20 S. Ct. 44 , 44 L. Ed. 96 .” In the case of Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. Paulter (C. C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

    170 P.3d 1024 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 2007

    Childrens Home and Welfare Association v. Childers, 1946 OK 180 , 171 P.2d 613, 614 ; Hawks v. Bland, 1932 OK 101 , 9 P.2d 720 , overruled in part on other grounds, Board of Commissioners of Marshall County v. … Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 20 , 85 P.3d 841, 847-848 , quoting, Leatherman v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • J. Brotton Corp. v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission

    62 O.B.A.J. 3758 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1991

    In Peterson v. … The ABLE Commission, and its predecessor, the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, have used their definition of the term “public school” since 1959. 10 In Oral Roberts Univ. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Jot Davis Welding Service v. Davis

    376 P.2d 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1962

    National Bank of Tulsa Bldg. v. Goldsmith, 204 Okl. 45 , 226 P.2d 916 ; Barney U. Brown & Sons v. Savage, 208 Okl. 668 , 258 P.2d 183 ; Folsom Auto Supplies v. Bristow, Okl., 275 P.2d 706 ; Shires v. … Brown & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • BURNS v. CLINE

    387 P.3d 348 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 2016

    Fent v. Fallin, 2013 OK 107, ¶ 4 , 315 P.3d 1023, 1025 (citation omitted). 12 . Id. 13 . Fent v. State ex rel. … Burns v. Cline, supra.; Oklahoma Capitol, supra. 20 . Burns v. Cline, 2016 OK 99, ¶ 11 , 382 P.3d at 1051 , citing Oklahoma Capitol, 2009 OK 15, ¶ 15 , 214 P.3d 799, 804-805 . 21 . Burns v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Heard

    178 Okla. 461 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1936

    Co. v. … This court later followed the above case in the case of De Noya v. Fidelity Phoenix Ins.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC. v. BD. OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF OKLA. COUNTY

    2017 OK 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 2017

    Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County v. Lawrence, 1938 OK 173, ¶ 11, 78 P.2d 669, 671. … Dept. of Human Services v. Board of County Com'rs of McClain County Discussed 1993 OK 169, 869 P.2d 309, 65 OBJ 44, City of Del City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hart Const. Co. v. Weaver

    201 Okla. 424 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1949

    In support of this contention they cite and rely upon the following cases: Oklahoma Leader Co. v. Wells, 147 Okla. 294 , 296 P. 751 ; National Biscuit Co. v. Lout, 179 Okla. 259 , 65 P. 2d 497 ; Turner v. … Clarksburg Paper Co. v. Roper, 196 Okla. 504 , 166 P. 2d 425 ; Carden Mining & Milling Co. v. Yost, 193 Okla. 423 , 144 P. 2d 969 ; Terminal Oil Mill Co. v. Younger, 188 Okla. 316 , 108 P. 2d 542 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • City of Oklahoma City v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of Labor

    918 P.2d 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1996

    Board of Commissioners of Pottawatomie County v. A.C. Davis & Sons, supra; Gordon v. Conner, supra , Richardson v. Mustang Fuel Corp., supra . … Velvet Dove Restaurant, Okl., 756 P.2d 1232, 1234 (1988); Pirrong v. Pirrong, Okl., 552 P.2d 383, 387 (1976); Pointer v. Hill, Okl., 536 P.2d 358, 361 (1975); Brown v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.