Case law

Anadarko Funeral Home v. Scarth

173 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1935

Gentis v. Hunt, 121 Okla. 71 , 247 P. 358 ; Buxton & Skinner Stationery Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Craig County, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 P. 215 , and cases cited. … In a recent opinion, Board of Com’rs of Okmulgee County v.

In Re Gypsy Oil Co.

141 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

In Pitts v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee, 138 Okla. 284 , 281 Pac. 133 , this court said: “Every municipality must submit its budget to the excise board of their respective counties. City of Sapulpa v. … Schulte v. Board of County Commissioners, 119 Okla. 261 , 250 Pac. 123 . The question then arises as to the effect of the funding- judgments.

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

146 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1930

The protestant relies upon the rule announced by this court in Grubb v. Smiley, 140 Okla. 233 , 283 Pac. 784 , and C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. … LESTER, V. C. J., absent.

Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank of Hooker v. Cole

184 Okla. 337 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1939

We said in First National Bank v. … “In the case of Brown v. Brown, 28 Minn. 501 , 11 N.

Mulligan v. Johnson

77 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1919

In the case of Coyle v. … It is urged the case of Board of Com’rs of Rogers Co. v. Lipe, 45 Okla. 685 , 146 Pac. 713 . in effect, overrules Coyle v. Board of Com’rs.

Carrico v. Couch

45 Okla. 672 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

In Crawford v. Wilson, 4 Barb. (N. … A delay arising from the act of. the court is never allowed to prejudice the party [Spaulding v. Congdon], 18 Wend. 543 ; [Ryghtmyer v. Durham], 12 Wend. 245 ; Springsted v. Jayne, 4 Cow. [N. Y.] 423; [Mackay v.

Stevens v. Harris

73 O.B.A.J. 1521 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 2002

Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448 ; Sandpiper North Apartments, Ltd. v. American Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Shaumee, 1979 OK 124 , 600 P.2d 882 and Roofing & Sheet Metal Supply Co. of Tulsa, Inc. v. … Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 18 , 989 P.2d 448 ; In re Tefertiller., 1989 OK 60, ¶ 9 , 772 P.2d 396 . 11 . Title 42 0.$.2001 § 152, see note 2, supra; 42 0.$.2001 § 153, see note 3, supra. 12 .

Brennan v. Hunter

68 Okla. 112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Kolachny v. Galbreath, 26 Okla. 772 , 110 Pac. 902 , 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 451; Brown v. Wilson, 58 Okla. 392 , 100 Pac. 94 , L. R. A. 1917B, 1184; Hill Oil & Gas Co. v. White, 53 Okla. 748 , 157 Pac. 710 . … Brown v. Wilson is not in conflict with the holding in Kolachny v.

In Re Green

173 Okla. 460 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

OSBORN, V. C. J. This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors that respondents Hazen Green and T. A. Chandler be disbarred from the practice of law, and that respondents K. B. Turner, M. E. … State ex rel, v. Ledbetter, 127 Okla. 85 , 260 P. 454 .

Barton v. Haight, Co.

169 Okla. 481 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1934

Supt., v. … The Supreme Court of Arkansas in Reiff et al. v. Redfield School Board et al., 191 S. W. 16 , says: “The board of school directors are public officers, within acts 1911.

Morgan v. Wilson

450 P.2d 902 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1969

The plaintiff states that under this section he is entitled to have a board of review hear his appeal. … The term “authorized” used in § 541a, does not mean “manda-torily directed”, Hullum v. R. J. Edwards, *904 Inc., 187 Okl. 408 , 103 P.2d 527 .

Earlboro Tp. v. Howard

47 Okla. 455 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1915

By leave of court, V. V. Jones, W. J. Ingram, and R. L. … Standeven et al. v. Armstrong et al., 27 Okla. 810 , 117 Pac. 332 , we said: “Ford v. Farmer et al., 9 Hump.

The Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r.

24 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

Board of County Com'rs, etc., 1 S. D. 370, 47 N. W. 296 ; State v. … Todd et al., 4 Ohio, 351; People v. McClees, 20 Colo. 403 , 38 Pac. 468 , 26 L. R. A. 646; People v. Rogers, 12 Colo. 278 , 20 Pac. 702 ; People v. Board of Trade, 193 Ill. 577 , 62 N.

Application of B of E of City of Ardmore

173 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1935

But in Curtis v. Board of Co. … Honnold v. Board of Com’rs, 71 Okla. 71 , 177 P. 71 ; News-Dispatch, etc., Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 130 Okla. 152 , 266 P. 437 , overruling Maryland Cas. Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 128 Okla. 58 , 260 P. 1112 .

City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.

109 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1925

Jones v. Citizens’ State Bank, 39 Okla. 393 , 135 Pac. 373 ; Dane v. Bennett, 51 Okla. 684 , 152 Pac. 347 ; Shawnee Light & Power Co. v. Sears, 21 Okla. 13 , 95 Pac. 449 ; Farmers State Bank of Jefferson v. … Buxton & Skinner Stationery Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Craig County, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 Pac. 215 .

Sharpe v. Engle

3 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1895

(Cooley on Taxation, [2d Ed.], p. 42; Barlow v. Ordinary, 47 Ga. 639 -642; Vail v. Bentley, 23 N. J. 532; Stetson v. Kempton, 13 Mass. 272 ; Webster v. The People, 98 Ill. 343 .) … The case of Mills v.

Woods v. Perryman

452 P.2d 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1969

Cross v. Brown, Okl., 363 P.2d 935 ; Skelly Oil Company v. Waters, Okl., 348 P.2d 320 ; Rider v. Bob Hiner Service Station, Okl., 321 P.2d 378 . … The decision is not in point and does not modify but affirms prior decisions of this court in Cross v. Brown, supra; Skelly Oil Company v. Waters, supra; and Rider v.

Jot Davis Welding Service v. Davis

376 P.2d 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1962

National Bank of Tulsa Bldg. v. Goldsmith, 204 Okl. 45 , 226 P.2d 916 ; Barney U. Brown & Sons v. Savage, 208 Okl. 668 , 258 P.2d 183 ; Folsom Auto Supplies v. Bristow, Okl., 275 P.2d 706 ; Shires v. … Brown & Sons, Inc. v.

Gilmer v. School Dist. No. 26, Noble County

41 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1913

Neither the statute quoted nor any other renders any act or proceeding of the board void because it is not recorded, nor makes the record of the board the only evidence of their actions” —citing Gillett v. … No. 2 v. Clark, 90 Mich. 435 , 51 N. W. 529 ; Indianapolis v. Imberry, 17 Ind. 175 ; School Dist. v. Atherton, 12 Metc. (Mass.) 113; Morgan v. Wilfley et al., 71 Iowa, 212 , 32 N. W. 265 ; Electric Co. v. Bd.

Terry v. Edgin

598 P.2d 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1979

Our Court cited Daniels v. Board of Education, 191 Mich. 339 , 158 N.W. 23 , L.R.A. 1916 F, 468, as authority for strict construction. … See: McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 (1968); City of Bethany v. Hill, Okl., 509 P.2d 1364 (1973).