Case law

Application of B of E of City of Ardmore

173 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1935

But in Curtis v. Board of Co. … Honnold v. Board of Com’rs, 71 Okla. 71 , 177 P. 71 ; News-Dispatch, etc., Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 130 Okla. 152 , 266 P. 437 , overruling Maryland Cas. Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 128 Okla. 58 , 260 P. 1112 .

Holway v. World Publishing Co.

171 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1935

Matthews v. Oklahoma Publishing Co., 103 Okla. 40 , 219 P. 947 ; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Watkins, 77 Okla. 270 , 188 P. 99 ; Kee v. … In Hargrove v.

Sexton v. Smith

32 Okla. 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1912

Kellogg v School District No. 10, 13 Okla. 285 , 74 Pac. 110 ; Hannan v. Board of Education, 25 Okla. 372 , 107 Pac. 646 ; Bowles v. Neely, 28 Okla. 556 , 115 Pac. 344 . … Hannon v. Board of Education, 25 Okla. 372 , 107 Pac. 646 , 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 214.

Becknell v. State Ex Rel. McRiley

68 Okla. 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Laws 1910, governing the establishment of voting precincts, makes it the duty of the county election board to create, alter, ’ or discontinue voting precincts, and requires the secretary of said board to keep in a bound book … 'Since this section of the state Constitution has been stricken down by the Supreme Court of the United States (Quinn et al. v. United States, 238 U. S. 347 , 35 Sup. Ct. 926, 59 L. Ed. 1340 , L. R.

Lusk v. Botts

64 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1917

board of agriculture in the eradication of the fever tick. … A similar question was presented to this court in the case of Lusk et al. v. Eminhiser, 53 Okla. 785 , 158 Pac. 915 .

Baker v. Carter

180 Okla. 71 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1937

McKenna v. McKenna (1897) 70 Ill. App. 340 ; Hite v. Hite (1899, Cal.) 57 P. 227 ; Keifer v. Keifer (1894, Colo. App.) 36 P. 621 ; Shaw v. Shaw (1894, Iowa) 61 N. W. 368 ; Litowich v. Litowich (1878) 19 Kan. 451 . … The adoption of this rule in this state has been suggested by dictum in Brown v.

Sharpe v. Engle

3 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1895

(Cooley on Taxation, [2d Ed.], p. 42; Barlow v. Ordinary, 47 Ga. 639 -642; Vail v. Bentley, 23 N. J. 532; Stetson v. Kempton, 13 Mass. 272 ; Webster v. The People, 98 Ill. 343 .) … The case of Mills v.

Town of Buffalo v. Walker

126 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1925

(Garst v. Love. 6 Okla. 46 ; Light v. Conover, 10 Okla. 732 ; Trist v. Child. 12 Wall. 441 : Meguire v. Corwine, 101 U. S. 108 ; McCullen v. Hoffman, 174 U. S. 639 ).” See. also. A. T & S. F. R. Co. … Holmes, 18 Okla. 92 , 99 Pac. 22 ; Prince v. Gosnell, 19 Okla. 175 92 Pac. 164 ; Binswonger v. Stanford, 28 Okla. 429 , 114 Pac. 621 ; Bokoshe Coal Co. v. Morehead, 34 Okla. 424 , 126 Pac. 1033 .

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.

170 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1934

Board of County Commissioners ; Number 4119, Sunnyside Hospital v. Board of County Commissioners; Number 4260, Rogers v. Board of County Commissioners ; Number 4261, Rogers v. … In Excise Board of Carter County v.

School District No. 39 v. School District No. 20

119 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1926

School District No. 7 v. Cunningham, 51 Okla. 261 , 151 Pac. 633 ; Board of Education v. McCracken, 62 Okla. 173 , 162 Pac. 782 . Counsel for plaintiffs in error cite and rely upon the cases of King v. State et rel. … In the case of King v. State ex rel.

JOHNSON v. MIDWEST CITY DEL CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

507 P.3d 637 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 2021

JOHNSON v. … Discussed 2014 OK 65 , 373 P.3d 1019 , PEOPLELINK, LLC. v. BEAR Discussed at Length 2016 OK 78 , 378 P.3d 562 , BOBER v. OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Discussed at Length 2017 OK 13 , 391 P.3d 111 , BROWN v.

Moore v. Hayes

744 P.2d 934 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1987

The respondents have pointed out that a similar situation was presented to this Court in the case of Clark v. State Election Board, 653 P.2d 529 (Okla.1982). … Oklahoma Tax Commission, 605 P.2d 1315, 1317-18 (Okla.1979); Johnson v. Petty, 138 Okla. 208 , 281 P. 276, 279 (1929). . Anthis v. Drew, 123 Okla. 18 , 252 P. 11, 14 (1925). . Burke v.

In Re Initiative Petition No. 344, State Question No. 630

797 P.2d 326 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1990

; (20) places the State Superintendent of Public Instruction under the supervision of the State Board of Education; (21) repeals the prohibition against State, National or County officers from serving on the Board of Regents … Id. at 603 (quoting Kerby v. Luhrs, 44 Ariz. 208 , 36 P.2d 549, 554 (1934)).

Swezey v. Fisher

484 P.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1971

JI-69 v. Independent School District No. D-45, Okl., 363 P.2d 835 (1961), popularly known as the Mustang case, and Tryon Dependent School District No. 125 of Lincoln County v. Carrier, Okl., 474 P.2d 131 (1970). … Tryon Dependent School District No. 125 of Lincoln County v. Carrier, Okl., 474 P.2d 131 (1970).

City of Guthrie v. Wylie

6 Okla. 61 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1896

(Blackburn v. Oklahoma City, supra; Broughton v. Pensacola, 93 U. S. 265 ; Mobile v. Watson, 116 U. S. 289 ; Milner’s Admr. v. City of Pensacola, 2 Woods, 632 ; O’Connor v. Memphis, 6 La. 730 ; Mt. Pleasant v. … (Abbott v. Omaha Smelting Co., 4 Neb. 416 ; Childs v. Hurd, 32 W. Va. 66 ; Spencer v. Cook, 16 La. 163 ; Bigelow v. Gregory, 73 Ill. 197 .)

Burkhart v. Jacob

70 O.B.A.J. 647 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1999

See Shell Pipe Line, 287 P.2d at 681 ; Swensen v. Marino 306 Mass. 582 , 29 N.E.2d 15, 17 (1940). ¶ 13 The Burkharts rely on Wells v. … V.

State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Ledbetter

162 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1933

That the respondent, as an attorney, filed in the District Court of the United 'States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, in cause No. 3982, entitled “Willis v. … It is only fair to the Honorable Board of Governors who made the report now under consideration to emphasize the fact that the apology above mentioned and the recommendation were not before the Honorable Board of Governors

Adams v. Parks

435 P.2d 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1967

Brown, plaintiff v. Chester Anderson, County Treasurer * * * (and others) * * * defendants” to quiet his asserted title. The plaintiffs in error, W. L. … See Sarkeys v. Scott, Okl., 269 P.2d 779 . As said in Walker v. Hoffman, Okl., 405 P.2d 57 , 61: “In Lind v.

Stout v. Mott

105 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1924

Defendant further assigns as error the refusal of the court to admit in evidence a letter written by one Stephen Brown of Ft. Smith, Ark. … Berry met Brown at Nowata and agreed upon the sale.

State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. Armstrong

158 Okla. 290 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1932

See Watkins Land-Mortgage Co. v. Mullen, 8 Kan. App. 705 , 54 P. 921 ; Brecht v. Hammonds (Ariz.) 278 P. 381 ; Excise Board of Carter County v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 152 Okla. 120 , 3 P. (2d) 1037 ; Winona Oil Co. v. … In the Moore v.