Case law

Creek County v. Robinson

114 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1925

Co. v. Cherokee County, supra; and in Allen & Rixse v. … The court then quotes from Allen & Rixse v.

Carey v. State Ex Rel. Doughty

180 Okla. 50 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1937

The plaintiffs in error contend that since the county is not mentioned in the judgment, either as a judgment creditor or judgment debtor, it is not a necessary party here, and they cite Board of Com’rs of Logan County v. … The authorities cited by the plaintiffs in error are not in conflict with this holding, for in the case of Board of Com’rs of Logan County v.

Hockaday v. Drye.

7 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1898

In Mather v. McMillan, 19 N. W. 442 , the same court, after citing Haben v. … In Clayton v.

Burkhart v. Jacob

70 O.B.A.J. 647 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1999

See Shell Pipe Line, 287 P.2d at 681 ; Swensen v. Marino 306 Mass. 582 , 29 N.E.2d 15, 17 (1940). ¶ 13 The Burkharts rely on Wells v. … V.

State Ex Rel. West, Atty. Gen. v. Bellamy

60 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1916

Finley v. Territory, 12 Okla. 621 , 73 Pac. 273 ; *63 Broaddus v. Pawnee County, 16 Okla. 473 , 88 Pac. 250 ; Anderson v. Grant County, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 . … Anderson v. Grant County, supra; Grant County v. Ernest, 45 Okla. 725 , 147 Pac. 322 .

Johnson v. Grady County

50 Okla. 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1915

In Anderson v. … Divet v. Richland County, 8 N.D. 65 , 76 N.W. 993 ; Kafka v. Wilkinson, 99 Md. 238 , 57 A. 617 ; Scharf v. Tasker, 73 Md. 378 , 21 A. 56 ; Ballentyne v. Wickersham, 75 Ala. 533 ; Holcomb v. Rock Island Ry.

Groves v. Bumgarner

662 P.2d 307 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1983

Const., and by reason of Edmondson v. State ex rel. Phelps, Okl., 533 P.2d 604 (1974); Helm v. State Election Board, Okl., 589 P.2d 224 (1979); Hembree v. City of Stilwell, Okl., 597 P.2d 1218 (1979).

Moore v. Porterfield

125 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1927

See Moore et al. v. … S. 1921), as construed by Jumper et al. v.

Mason v. Ackley

52 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1915

In Bank of Welch v. … et al. v.

Application of B of E of City of Ardmore

173 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1935

But in Curtis v. Board of Co. … Honnold v. Board of Com’rs, 71 Okla. 71 , 177 P. 71 ; News-Dispatch, etc., Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 130 Okla. 152 , 266 P. 437 , overruling Maryland Cas. Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 128 Okla. 58 , 260 P. 1112 .

State Ex Rel. West v. Frame

38 Okla. 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1913

De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 197 , 21 Sup. Ct. 753, 45 L. Ed. 1041 . The foregoing general rule has no application to the class of laws now under consideration. … Arie v. State, 1 Okla. Or. 666, 100 Pac. 23 ; State v. Chaney et al., 23 Okla. 788 , 102 Pac. 133 ; Frick v. Oats, 20 Okla. 473 , 94 Pac. 682 .

Holway v. World Publishing Co.

171 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1935

Matthews v. Oklahoma Publishing Co., 103 Okla. 40 , 219 P. 947 ; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Watkins, 77 Okla. 270 , 188 P. 99 ; Kee v. … In Hargrove v.

Sexton v. Smith

32 Okla. 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1912

Kellogg v School District No. 10, 13 Okla. 285 , 74 Pac. 110 ; Hannan v. Board of Education, 25 Okla. 372 , 107 Pac. 646 ; Bowles v. Neely, 28 Okla. 556 , 115 Pac. 344 . … Hannon v. Board of Education, 25 Okla. 372 , 107 Pac. 646 , 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 214.

In Re Boyd

658 P.2d 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1983

Several courts have considered the issue presented in Quigley v. Caron, supra , wherein the debtor was required by the terms of the security agreement to keep the secured property insured. In Brown v. … To the cases cited in Brown, supra, in support of the views therein expressed, may be added Ettinger v.

Lusk v. Botts

64 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1917

board of agriculture in the eradication of the fever tick. … A similar question was presented to this court in the case of Lusk et al. v. Eminhiser, 53 Okla. 785 , 158 Pac. 915 .

Baker v. Carter

180 Okla. 71 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1937

McKenna v. McKenna (1897) 70 Ill. App. 340 ; Hite v. Hite (1899, Cal.) 57 P. 227 ; Keifer v. Keifer (1894, Colo. App.) 36 P. 621 ; Shaw v. Shaw (1894, Iowa) 61 N. W. 368 ; Litowich v. Litowich (1878) 19 Kan. 451 . … The adoption of this rule in this state has been suggested by dictum in Brown v.

Sharpe v. Engle

3 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1895

(Cooley on Taxation, [2d Ed.], p. 42; Barlow v. Ordinary, 47 Ga. 639 -642; Vail v. Bentley, 23 N. J. 532; Stetson v. Kempton, 13 Mass. 272 ; Webster v. The People, 98 Ill. 343 .) … The case of Mills v.

Town of Buffalo v. Walker

126 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1925

(Garst v. Love. 6 Okla. 46 ; Light v. Conover, 10 Okla. 732 ; Trist v. Child. 12 Wall. 441 : Meguire v. Corwine, 101 U. S. 108 ; McCullen v. Hoffman, 174 U. S. 639 ).” See. also. A. T & S. F. R. Co. … Holmes, 18 Okla. 92 , 99 Pac. 22 ; Prince v. Gosnell, 19 Okla. 175 92 Pac. 164 ; Binswonger v. Stanford, 28 Okla. 429 , 114 Pac. 621 ; Bokoshe Coal Co. v. Morehead, 34 Okla. 424 , 126 Pac. 1033 .

Defenbaugh v. Purcell

191 Okla. 192 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1942

In this connection defendant cites Billingsley v. Parmenter, 181 Okla. 315 , 73 P. 2d 869 ; McAnally v. … CORN, V. C. J., and DAVISON, J., absent.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.

170 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1934

Board of County Commissioners ; Number 4119, Sunnyside Hospital v. Board of County Commissioners; Number 4260, Rogers v. Board of County Commissioners ; Number 4261, Rogers v. … In Excise Board of Carter County v.