Case law

Becknell v. State Ex Rel. McRiley

68 Okla. 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Laws 1910, governing the establishment of voting precincts, makes it the duty of the county election board to create, alter, ’ or discontinue voting precincts, and requires the secretary of said board to keep in a bound book … 'Since this section of the state Constitution has been stricken down by the Supreme Court of the United States (Quinn et al. v. United States, 238 U. S. 347 , 35 Sup. Ct. 926, 59 L. Ed. 1340 , L. R.

Boevers v. Election Bd. of Canadian County

640 P.2d 1333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1981

Stover v. Alfalfa County Election Board, Okl., 530 P.2d 1020, 1021 (1975); Sparks v. State Election Board, Okl., 392 P.2d 711, 712 (1964). … Hatfield, 59 Okl. 132 , 158 P. 942, 944 (1916); Duncan v. Wilkins, 103 Okl., 221 , 229 P. 801, 802 (1924); Nation v. Savely, 127 Okl., 117 , 260 P. 32, 34 (1927) and Babb v.

Trusty v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety

381 P.3d 726 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 2016

Price v. … See Estes v.

Adkins v. Mustang Fuel Corp.

527 P.2d 842 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1974

Oklahoma City v. Excise Board of Okl. Co. et al., 193 Okl. 189 , 141 P.2d 805 (1943). Oklahoma City v. Excise Board of Okl. Co., supra, is distinguishable from Commercial Nat’l Bank v. … Robinson, 66 Okl. 235 , 168 P. 810 (1917); and Garvin v. Harris, Okl., 509 P.2d 119 (1973) in that in Oklahoma City v.

Application of Erick Hospital District

444 P.2d 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1968

In Gilfillan et al. v. … In Harrington et al. v.

Midland Valley R. Co. v. McLemore

73 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1918

Co. v. Baertz, 36 Ind. App. 408 , 74 N. E. 51 ; Austin R. R. Co. v. Rucker et al., 59 Tex. 587 ; Railroad Co. v. Daniels, 62 Tex. 70 ; Murphy v. Adams, 71 Me. 113 , 36 Am. Rep. 299 : Railroad v. … W. 213 ; Brown v. School Dist., 48 Kan. 709 , 29 Pac. 1069 ; Insurance Co. v. Brown, 3 Kan. App. 225 , 44 Pac. 35 ;. Sutton et al. v. The Victorian, 26 Ore. 194 , 41 Pac. 1103 ; Duncan v.

Stout v. Mott

105 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1924

Defendant further assigns as error the refusal of the court to admit in evidence a letter written by one Stephen Brown of Ft. Smith, Ark. … Berry met Brown at Nowata and agreed upon the sale.

Town of Afton v. Gill

57 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1916

Edwards v. Millar, supra; State v. Barnes, 22 Okla. 192 , 97 Pac. 997 ; Barnes v. Hill, 23 Okla. 207 , 99 Pac. 927 ; City of Ardmore v. State, 24 Okla. 862 , 104 Pac. 913 ; Coleman v. … In Kellogg v.

In Re Inglis

69 Okla. 64 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 14, 1917

In support of the text the following authorities are cited: Medley v. Elliott, 62 Ill. 532 ; Ralston v. Hughs, 13 Ill. 469 ; Morrison v. Hampton (Ky.) 49 S. W. 781 ; Beltram v. Willere (La. … Ann.) 4 South. 506 ; Williams v. Hilton, 35 Me. 547 , 58 Am. Dec. 729 ; Fuller v. Hodgdon, 25 Me. 243 .

Barnett v. Incorporated Town of Waynoka

148 Okla. 24 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1930

We think the facts of this case bring it within the rule announced in the case of Bartlesville v. … LESTER, V. C. X, and CLARK, SWIN-DALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J-, and HUNT, RILEY, and CULLISON, JJ., absent.

Hankins v. Hall

176 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1936

Yoast v. Sims, 122 Okla. 200 , 253 P. 504 ; Bass, Maxwell & Co. v. Independent Gin Co., 140 Okla. 80 , 282 P. 635 : Wagnon v. Brown, 169 Okla. 292 , 36 P. (2d) 723 ; Brotherhood of Ry. Trainmen v. … Brown, 170 Okla. 67 , 38 P. (2d) 529 ; Beatrice Creamery Co. v. Dollie Goldman, 175 Okla. 300 , 52 P. (2d) 1033 . (See, also, 56 A. L. R. 1418, and 74 A. L. R. 849.)

In Re Green

173 Okla. 460 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

OSBORN, V. C. J. This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors that respondents Hazen Green and T. A. Chandler be disbarred from the practice of law, and that respondents K. B. Turner, M. E. … State ex rel, v. Ledbetter, 127 Okla. 85 , 260 P. 454 .

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission

73 O.B.A.J. 1539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 2002

Brown, 1996 OK 112, ¶ 6 , 925 P.2d 888, 890 (citing Pryse Monument Company v. … Brown, supra note 57 at 651 n. 6 (citing Parks v. Norman Municipal Hospital, 1984 OK 53, ¶ 12 , 684 P.2d 548, 552 ). .

OWENS v. ZUMWALT

2022 OK 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 2022

OSCN Found Document:OWENS v. ZUMWALT OWENS v. … Brown v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n , 2005 OK 88 , ¶ 11, 125 P.3d 1219, 1225 .

Depuy v. Hoeme

611 P.2d 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1980

Because both cases (Depuy v. Hoeme, Case No. 50,472, and Depuy v. … IRWIN, V. C. J., dissents. 1 . Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy Dist., Okl., 464 P.2d 748 (1969); Iven v. Roder, Okl., 431 P.2d 321 (1967); and Lynn v.

School District No. 39 v. School District No. 20

119 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1926

School District No. 7 v. Cunningham, 51 Okla. 261 , 151 Pac. 633 ; Board of Education v. McCracken, 62 Okla. 173 , 162 Pac. 782 . Counsel for plaintiffs in error cite and rely upon the cases of King v. State et rel. … In the case of King v. State ex rel.

In Re Maben

167 Okla. 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1933

In the case of State v. Cutlip, 83 Okla. 183 , 202 P. 782 , it is said: “In an action to disbar an attorney his guilt must be clearly proven, although the proceeding is a civil action.” … For such insufficiency in the findings of fact of said board the recommendation of the Board of Governors is disapproved. RILEY, O. X, OULLISON, V. G. X, and SWINDALL, and McNEILL, JX, concur.

Childers v. Independent School District No. 1 of Bryan County

645 P.2d 992 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1981

See 75 O.S. § 322(l)(e), and Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Mas *996 ter Conservancy District, 464 P.2d 748 (Okl.1969). … Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, supra.

Adams v. Parks

435 P.2d 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1967

Brown, plaintiff v. Chester Anderson, County Treasurer * * * (and others) * * * defendants” to quiet his asserted title. The plaintiffs in error, W. L. … See Sarkeys v. Scott, Okl., 269 P.2d 779 . As said in Walker v. Hoffman, Okl., 405 P.2d 57 , 61: “In Lind v.

St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Morris

143 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1930

In support of that contention plaintiff cites Board of Commissioners of Logan County v. State ex rel. … Under the rule announced by this court in the case of Board of Commissioners of Logan County v. State ex rel.