Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.32s
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
73 O.B.A.J. 1539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 2002
Brown, 1996 OK 112, ¶ 6 , 925 P.2d 888, 890 (citing Pryse Monument Company v. … Brown, supra note 57 at 651 n. 6 (citing Parks v. Norman Municipal Hospital, 1984 OK 53, ¶ 12 , 684 P.2d 548, 552 ). .
Cited 6 timesPublishedCummings v. State Ex Rel. Wallower
47 Okla. 627 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1915
At the time, the personnel of the shareholders and the board of directors was the same. People ex rel. Wallace v. Sterling, 82 Ill. 457 ; Manufacturers, etc., Co. v. Landay, 219 Ill. 168 , 76 N. E. 146 . … Schneider v. Norris, 2 M. & S. 286; Streff v. Colteaux, 64 Ill. App. 179 ; National *636 Accident Society v. Spiro [ 78 Fed. 774 , 24 C. C. A. 334 ], 47 U. S. App. 293; Hamilton v. State, 103 Ind. 96 [ 2 N.
Cited 11 timesPublished442 P.2d 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1966
(emphasis ours) The case of Welch v. … In the Welch v.
Cited 1 timesPublished204 Okla. 596 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1951
Other charges were made against the doctor in the complaint filed with the Board, but he was exonerated on these charges and his license was revoked solely for the reason that the Board found that the above advertisement … Board of Medical Examiners, supra. The order or finding of the Board of Medical Examiners revoking the defendant’s license is reversed, with directions to set aside the revocation.
Cited 2 timesPublished143 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1930
In the case of Carr v. Wilson, 9 S. … In the case of People v. Crissey, 91 N.
Cited 21 timesPublished159 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1932
finally rendered against the plaintiff in error, Herbert Walker, who had taken the car and was using it for his own purposes at the time of the accident, and was in the car, which was being driven by a man by the name of Brown … J., CLARK, V. O. J., and HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. McNEILL, J., disqualified. RILEY, J., absent.
Cited 0 timesPublished10 Okla. 329 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1900
county board of examiners. … The supreme court of the United States in the case Supervisors v. United States, 4 Wall. 435 , had under consideration the question as to when the word “may” in a statute imposes an imperative duty. Mr.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSchool Dist. No. 68, Noble County v. Wollingford
69 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1917
The case of Woolsey et al. v. … Oases of interest, as throwing light on the several matters in controversy herein, in addition to those already cited, are: Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County v.
Cited 3 timesPublished128 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1927
Co. v. City of Bartlesville, 27 Okla. 214 , 111 Pac. 207 ; Spradling v. Hudson, 45 Okla. 767 , 146 Pac. 588 . … Judge, 90 Okla. 170 , 221 Pac. 9 ; Kincannon v. Pugh, 114 Okla. 90 , 243 Pac. 945 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedPetition of University Hospitals Authority
953 P.2d 314 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1998
Barton, 55 N.Y. 68 , 14 Am.Rep. 181 (1873). [6] 2 Schouler, Personal Property (3rd Ed.) 61 (1896); Brown, The Law of Personal Property (3rd Ed.) 114-115 (1975). [7] State v. … Except as otherwise provided in this section, the superintendent of schools appointed and employed by the board shall be the executive officer of said board and shall perform duties as said board directs.
Cited 20 timesPublishedAppeal of Billings Community Elevator, Inc.
510 P.2d 953 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1972
Unlike appeals from a county board of equalization to the district court, those appeals are not tried de novo. In two of the cases, Chapman, County Treasurer, et al. v. … The situation herein is not at all comparable to the situation in County Board of Equalization of Kay County v. Frontier Grain Company (1969), Okl., 454 P.2d 317 .
Cited 3 timesPublished208 Okla. 334 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1952
In McCleary v. Brown, 190 Okla. 19 , 119 P. 2d 830 , this court held: “2. … United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co., 49 Okla. 398 , 153 P. 195 ; Broadwell v. Board of Commissioners, 88 Okla. 147 , 211 P. 1040 ; Skelly Oil Co., v. Harrell, 192 Okla. 101 , 134 P. 2d 136 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedCherokee Public Service Co. v. Orr
178 Okla. 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1936
Barnes, 162 Okla. 44 , 18 P. (2d) 1089 ; Grayson v. Brown, 166 Okla. 43 , 26 P. (2d) 204 ; Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown, 170 Okla. 210 , 39 P. (2d) 150 ; Carr v. Puckett, 176 Okla. 140 , 54 P. (2d) 1063 . … Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown, 170 Okla. 210 , 39 P. (2d) 150 . Finding- no error in the judgment of the trial court, such judgment is affirmed. McNEILL, C. X, OSBORN, Y. C.
Cited 4 timesPublished187 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1940
and not as a “member of the board of education” of the district, and that Hickman was elected as “director of the school board” and not as a member of the board of education of said district. … Cameron v.
Cited 2 timesPublished141 Okla. 277 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1930
Brown v. Lang, 4 Ala. 50 ; Brown v. Lang, 14 Ala. 719 , and Lang v. Brown et al., 21 Ala. 179 . … In the instant case, the allegations held necessary in Ginn v. Brown, supra, were clearly set forth in the petition.
Cited 7 timesPublished179 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1937
Petitioner relies upon Board of County Commissioners v. Whitlow, 88 Okla. 72 , 211 P. 1021 , and Whiteneck, Adm’x, v. … Lacy, 161 Okla. 138 , 17 P. (2d) 398 , the rule previously, announced by this court in Whiteneck, Adm’x, v. Board of Com’rs of Woods County, 89 Okla. 52 , 213 P. 865 , and Board of Com’rs of Pawnee County v.
Cited 16 timesPublished415 P.2d 917 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1966
to City of Tulsa v. … It was shown at the first trial (as reflected in our opinion in City of Tulsa v.
Cited 11 timesPublished31 Okla. 331 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1911
shall be *333 properly certified by said county election board to the city council or town board of trustees, who shall make proper appropriations therefor.” … Ripey & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mill, 27 Okla. 600 , 112 Pac. 1119 . In determining what the Legislature intended, we may look to the entire act, including the context.
Cited 9 timesPublished766 P.2d 341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1988
Clark v. First Baptist Church, 570 P.2d 327 (Okla.1977). … Blankenship v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIndependent School District No. I-20 of Muskogee County v. Oklahoma State Department of Education
74 O.B.A.J. 731 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 2003
Protest of Downing, 1933 OK 387 , ¶ -, 23 P.2d 173 ; Syracuse Trust Co. v. Board of Sup’rs of Oneida County, 258 A.D. 17 , 15 N.Y.S.2d 920 (1939); Christofferson v. … Independent School District No. 1 v. Howard, 1959 OK 17, ¶ 7 , 336 P.2d 1097 ; Consolidated School Dist. No. 6 v. Panther Oil & Grease Mfg. Co., 1946 OK 137, ¶ 4 , 168 P.2d 613 ; Board of Education of School Dist.
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna