Case law

Turlington v. Summers

162 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1933

In the case of Madrid v. Sandoval, 13 P. (2d) 877 , the Supreme Court of New Mexico on this question says: “The governing rules are well stated by Mr. Justice Brewer in Hudson v. … the statute, and that while in such custody they have not been so exposed to the reach of unauthorized persons as to afford a reasonable probability of their having been changed or tampered with,’ * * * “As said in Hannah v.

In Re Threadgill

166 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1933

Thereafter respondent filed a petition in error in this court to review the action of the Board of Governors. … The action of the Board of Governors is approved and respondent is disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Oklahoma. RILEY, O. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, OSBORN, BUSBY, and WELCH, JJ., concur. CULLISON, V. C.

Riedt v. City of McAlester

262 P.2d 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1953

Action upon the petition by the governing board of the municipality constitutes a finding that the petition was signed by the requisite number of property owners, Berry v. … McKnight et al. v. City of Oklahoma City, 165 Okl. 210 , 25 P.2d 638 ; White v. City of Pawhuska, 130 Okl. 156 , 265 P. 1059 .” Baldwin v. City of Lawton, supra [ 198 Okl. 585 , 185 P.2d 701 ].

Baker v. Hammett

23 Okla. 480 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1909

On this subject in a case in which very full consideration is *486 given to it — Taylor v. Brown, 5 Dak. 335, 349 , 40 N. … Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v. Porter et al., 19 Okla. 173 , 92 Pac. 152 ; Lee v. United States, 7 Okla. 558 , 54 Pac. 792 ; Kellogg v.

Collier v. Insignia Financial Group

70 O.B.A.J. 1804 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1999

Brown v. Ford, 1995 OK 101 , 905 P.2d 223, 226 . 3 . Hayes v. Eateries, Inc., 1995 OK 108 , 905 P.2d 778, 781 ; Burk v. K-Mart Corp., 1989 OK 22 , 770 P.2d 24, 26 . See also Hutton v. … See Brown, supra note 2 at 11 . The Court in Meritor Savings Bank v.

City of Ardmore v. Sayre

54 Okla. 779 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

The rule laid down in Cameron v. … The case of Stearns, Mayor, v.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Love

29 Okla. 523 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1911

Good et al. v. Keel et al., ante, 116 Pac. 777 ; Walbridge v. Board of County Com’ rs, supra; I Elliott on Roads and Streets (3d Ed.) § 438. … Deeter, supra; Henry v. Ward et al., 49 Neb. 392 , 68 N. W. 518 ; Oyler v. Ross, 48 Neb. 211 , 66 N. W. 1099 ; Livingston v. Board of County Com’rs of Johnson County, 42 Neb. 277 , 60 N. W. 555 ; Beatty et al. v.

Persons v. Penn

33 Okla. 581 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1912

party took any steps by proceeding in court toward compelling the board to prepare such ballots. … Curtis, 4 Idaho, 193 , 38 Pac. 405 ; Atkeson v. Lay, 115 Mo. 538 , 22 S. W. 481 ; State ex rel. Woody v. Rotwitt, 18 Mont. 502 , 46 Pac. 370 .

Jones v. Seawell

13 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1904

$212.50, with the secretary of the board. … The case of Smith et al. v.

Moss v. Hunt

40 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1913

Stemper v. Higgins, 38 Minn. 222 , 37 N. W. 95 ; Kingrey v. Berry, 94 Ill. 515 ; Merritt v. Hinton, 55 Ark. 12 , 17 S. W. 270 ; Albert v. Twohig, 35 Neb. 563 , 53 N. W. 582 ; Murphy v. Battle, 155 Ill. 182 , 40 N. … Justice Brewer, in Hudson v.

Bratten v. White

181 Okla. 543 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1938

Yoast v. Sims. 122 Okla. 200 . 253 P. 504 : Bass. Maxwell & Co. v. Independent Gin Co., 140 Okla. 80 . 282 P. 635 : Wagnon v. Brown, 169 Okla. 292 , 36 P. (2d) 723 : Brotherhnod of Railroad Trainmen v. … Brown, 170 Okla. 67 , 38 P. (2d) 529 : Beatrice Creamery Co. v. Goldman, 175 Okla. 300 . 52 P. (2d) 1 1033 1035. * * * Roe. also. Jessup v. Davis. 115 Neb. 1 . 211 N. W. 190 . 56 A. L. R. 1403, 1418. and Stehouwer v.

Hawkins v. Whayne

198 Okla. 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1947

Co., 137 Okla. 186 , 279 P. 319 ; Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; In re Benson, 178 Okla. 299 , 62 P. 2d 962 ; Welch v. Simmons, 190 Okla. 611 , 126 P. 2d 89 . … In Lyons v. Wallen, supra, and again in Hemsley v.

Cimmarron Transportation, LLC v. Heavner

186 P.3d 947 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 2008

See, County Board of Equalization v. Frontier Grain, Co., 1969 OK 82 , 454 P.2d 317 . … The assessor asserts that the comparable sales presented by Cimmar-ron were "cherry-picked" by Cimmarron. 113 In County Board of Equalization v.

Choate v. State

204 Okla. 596 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1951

Other charges were made against the doctor in the complaint filed with the Board, but he was exonerated on these charges and his license was revoked solely for the reason that the Board found that the above advertisement … Board of Medical Examiners, supra. The order or finding of the Board of Medical Examiners revoking the defendant’s license is reversed, with directions to set aside the revocation.

UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS

539 P.3d 1284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 2023

OSCN Found Document:UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. … VIRGINIA UNDERWOOD, Complainant, v. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS, Respondent.

Taylor v. Callahan

82 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1921

Plaintiffs in error state this is an overlapping lease and void for the reasons stated in the case of Brown v. Van Pelt, 64 Okla. 109 , 166 Pac. 102 ; it being their contention! … Plaintiffs in error attempt to assume that Brown v.

Herd Equipment Co. v. Eagle Township

180 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

To the same effect is Board of County Com’rs of Okmulgee County v. Alexander, 171 Okla. 288 , 42 P. (2d) 884 . … Drake, 167 Okla. 510 , 30 P. (2d) 903 ; Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Morningside Hospital and Training School for Nurses, 175 Okla. 242 , 51 P. (2d) 928 ; Central National Bank of Okmulgee v.

Rasure v. Sparks

75 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1919

Ewing v. Turner, 2 Okla. 94 , 35 Pac. 951 ; Cameron v. Parker, 2 Okla. 277 , 38 Pac. 14 ; Matney v. King, 20 Okla. 22 , 93 Pac. 737 . … See, also, North v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 1115 ; Faulk v. Board of Commissioners, 40 Okla. 705 , 140 Pac. 777 .

Walker v. Lahman

159 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1932

finally rendered against the plaintiff in error, Herbert Walker, who had taken the car and was using it for his own purposes at the time of the accident, and was in the car, which was being driven by a man by the name of Brown … J., CLARK, V. O. J., and HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. McNEILL, J., disqualified. RILEY, J., absent.

Appeal of Billings Community Elevator, Inc.

510 P.2d 953 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1972

Unlike appeals from a county board of equalization to the district court, those appeals are not tried de novo. In two of the cases, Chapman, County Treasurer, et al. v. … The situation herein is not at all comparable to the situation in County Board of Equalization of Kay County v. Frontier Grain Company (1969), Okl., 454 P.2d 317 .