Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.60s

  • Jones v. Seawell

    13 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1904

    $212.50, with the secretary of the board. … The case of Smith et al. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Herd Equipment Co. v. Eagle Township

    180 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

    To the same effect is Board of County Com’rs of Okmulgee County v. Alexander, 171 Okla. 288 , 42 P. (2d) 884 . … Drake, 167 Okla. 510 , 30 P. (2d) 903 ; Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Morningside Hospital and Training School for Nurses, 175 Okla. 242 , 51 P. (2d) 928 ; Central National Bank of Okmulgee v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Riedt v. City of McAlester

    262 P.2d 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1953

    Action upon the petition by the governing board of the municipality constitutes a finding that the petition was signed by the requisite number of property owners, Berry v. … McKnight et al. v. City of Oklahoma City, 165 Okl. 210 , 25 P.2d 638 ; White v. City of Pawhuska, 130 Okl. 156 , 265 P. 1059 .” Baldwin v. City of Lawton, supra [ 198 Okl. 585 , 185 P.2d 701 ].

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Hammett

    23 Okla. 480 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1909

    On this subject in a case in which very full consideration is *486 given to it — Taylor v. Brown, 5 Dak. 335, 349 , 40 N. … Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v. Porter et al., 19 Okla. 173 , 92 Pac. 152 ; Lee v. United States, 7 Okla. 558 , 54 Pac. 792 ; Kellogg v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • City of Ardmore v. Sayre

    54 Okla. 779 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

    The rule laid down in Cameron v. … The case of Stearns, Mayor, v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Comstock v. City of Commerce

    100 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1924

    Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. et al., 27 Okla. 247 , 111 Pac. 198 ; Bowles v. Neeley, Mayor, et al., 28 Okla. 556 , 115 Pac. 344 ; Diggs v. … Incorporated Town of Ryan et al., 32 Okla. 738 , 124 Pac. 19 ; Haskins & Sells v. Oklahoma City, 36 Okla. 57 , 126 Pac. 204 ; Board of Commissioners of Washita County v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 ; Michael v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Oklahoma City

    187 Okla. 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

    McKee v. Bowlin, 184 Okla. 486 , 87 P. 2d 1079 , and other cases. … WELCH, V. C. J., and OSBORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Moss v. Hunt

    40 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1913

    Stemper v. Higgins, 38 Minn. 222 , 37 N. W. 95 ; Kingrey v. Berry, 94 Ill. 515 ; Merritt v. Hinton, 55 Ark. 12 , 17 S. W. 270 ; Albert v. Twohig, 35 Neb. 563 , 53 N. W. 582 ; Murphy v. Battle, 155 Ill. 182 , 40 N. … Justice Brewer, in Hudson v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hawkins v. Whayne

    198 Okla. 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1947

    Co., 137 Okla. 186 , 279 P. 319 ; Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; In re Benson, 178 Okla. 299 , 62 P. 2d 962 ; Welch v. Simmons, 190 Okla. 611 , 126 P. 2d 89 . … In Lyons v. Wallen, supra, and again in Hemsley v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Melvin v. Dunn

    607 P.2d 694 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1980

    The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma issued a writ of mandamus in Poulos v. … Tulsa Classroom Teachers Assn., Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hurd v. Freeland

    442 P.2d 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1966

    (emphasis ours) The case of Welch v. … In the Welch v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cimmarron Transportation, LLC v. Heavner

    186 P.3d 947 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 2008

    See, County Board of Equalization v. Frontier Grain, Co., 1969 OK 82 , 454 P.2d 317 . … The assessor asserts that the comparable sales presented by Cimmar-ron were "cherry-picked" by Cimmarron. 113 In County Board of Equalization v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Choate v. State

    204 Okla. 596 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1951

    Other charges were made against the doctor in the complaint filed with the Board, but he was exonerated on these charges and his license was revoked solely for the reason that the Board found that the above advertisement … Board of Medical Examiners, supra. The order or finding of the Board of Medical Examiners revoking the defendant’s license is reversed, with directions to set aside the revocation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS

    539 P.3d 1284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 2023

    OSCN Found Document:UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only UNDERWOOD v. STATE BD. … VIRGINIA UNDERWOOD, Complainant, v. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS, Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gragg v. Dudley

    143 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1930

    In the case of Carr v. Wilson, 9 S. … In the case of People v. Crissey, 91 N.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Rasure v. Sparks

    75 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1919

    Ewing v. Turner, 2 Okla. 94 , 35 Pac. 951 ; Cameron v. Parker, 2 Okla. 277 , 38 Pac. 14 ; Matney v. King, 20 Okla. 22 , 93 Pac. 737 . … See, also, North v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 1115 ; Faulk v. Board of Commissioners, 40 Okla. 705 , 140 Pac. 777 .

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Lahman

    159 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1932

    finally rendered against the plaintiff in error, Herbert Walker, who had taken the car and was using it for his own purposes at the time of the accident, and was in the car, which was being driven by a man by the name of Brown … J., CLARK, V. O. J., and HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. McNEILL, J., disqualified. RILEY, J., absent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Borcherding's Custody

    196 Okla. 19 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1945

    Supp. 516 ; Brown v. Brown, 2 Ala. A. 461, 56 So. 589 ; Armstrong v. Armstrong, 196 Iowa, 949 , 192 N. W. 146 ; Gill v. Walker, 113 S. C. 39, 100 S.E. 894 ; Brown v. Harden, 150. Ga. 99, 102 S.E. 864 . … See, also, Popham v. Cross, 41 Okla. 629 , 137 P. 673 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cherokee Public Service Co. v. Orr

    178 Okla. 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1936

    Barnes, 162 Okla. 44 , 18 P. (2d) 1089 ; Grayson v. Brown, 166 Okla. 43 , 26 P. (2d) 204 ; Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown, 170 Okla. 210 , 39 P. (2d) 150 ; Carr v. Puckett, 176 Okla. 140 , 54 P. (2d) 1063 . … Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown, 170 Okla. 210 , 39 P. (2d) 150 . Finding- no error in the judgment of the trial court, such judgment is affirmed. McNEILL, C. X, OSBORN, Y. C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Byars State Bank

    141 Okla. 277 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1930

    Brown v. Lang, 4 Ala. 50 ; Brown v. Lang, 14 Ala. 719 , and Lang v. Brown et al., 21 Ala. 179 . … In the instant case, the allegations held necessary in Ginn v. Brown, supra, were clearly set forth in the petition.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.