Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.22s

  • Eaton v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

    122 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1925

    Board of Ed. Oklahoma City v. … In Board of Ed. v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board, 194 Okla. 40 (1944)Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Kelley v. City of Tulsa

    569 P.2d 455 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1977

    Subsequently, appellant and his attorney appeared before the Board of Commissioners of the City of Tulsa (Board). … State, 49 Ala.App. 68 , 268 So.2d 850, 853 (1972); Gibbs v. State, 385 S.W.2d 258, 260 (Tex.Cr.App.1965); Ruedas v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 291 , 158 S.W.2d 500, 503 (1942); Grammer v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Truttman v. City of McAlester

    206 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1952

    In Dickey v. … Grigsby v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Independent School District No. 35 of Cherokee County v. Doty

    448 P.2d 846 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1968

    . § 8-3, Board of Education of Independent School District No. One of Tulsa County, Oklahoma v. Clendenning, Okl., 431 P.2d 382 . … Provided a child may be transferred by the State Board of Education to a school district in another state, if the board of education of the school district in which the child resides and the board of education of the high

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Carleton

    188 Okla. 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1941

    J. 978 § 129; see, also, Tooele County v. De La Mare, 90 Utah, 46 , 59 P. 2d 1155 ; State ex rel. Hopkins v. Board of Education, 106 Kan. 863 , 189 P. 915 ; State ex rel, Hopkins v. … Board of Education, 108 Kan. 101 , 193 P. 1074 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30

    74 O.B.A.J. 969 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2003

    Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . 13 . Mahan v. … United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166, 174-75 , 101 S.Ct. 453, 459 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980); New Orleans v. Dukes, 427 U.S. 297, 303 , 96 S.Ct. 2513, 2516 , 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976); Ross v.

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • Crane v. Owens

    180 Okla. 452 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1936

    Mascho, Robert Crane, and Jack Shaffer were stockholders of and constituted the board of directors of the Sac & Fox Oil Company. … Co. v. Arnold, 94 Okla. 120 , 221 P. 19 ; Howard v. Brown, 172 Okla. 308 , 44 P. (2d) 959 . The above authorities apply with peculiar force to the issue of election of remedies as presented herein.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Camps v. Taylor

    66 O.B.A.J. 1113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1995

    Bass v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., Okl., 804 P.2d 1138, 1139 (1991); Brown & Root v. Dunkelberger, 196 Okl. 116 , 162 P.2d 1018, 1020 (1945). . … Williams v. Mulvihill, Okl., 846 P.2d 1097 , 1102 n. 14 (1993); Board of Law Library Trustees v. State, Okl., 825 P.2d 1285, 1288 (1992). . Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court, Etc., Okl., 595 P.2d 435, 438 (1979). .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re the Appeal of Thompson Building Co.

    316 P.2d 179 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1957

    On June 10, 1952, immediately prior to the adjournment of the board, the taxpayer filed written notice of appeal from said decision of the board to the district court. … Krumme v. Walker, 199 Okl. 6 , 181 P.2d 835, 838 , citing Liles v. Bigpond, 190 Okl. 112 , 121 P.2d 596 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Turner

    125 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1926

    In Goree et al. v. … In Munger et al. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • St. Joseph Mining Co. v. Pettitt

    90 Okla. 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1923

    Co. v. … In Struber v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • City of Wagoner v. Case

    170 Okla. 577 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1935

    In the Hinz v. … . * * *” (Citing Keenan v. Southworth, 110 Mass. 474 ; Bailey v. Mayor of N. Y., 3 Hill. 531, and other decisions sustaining the rule.) In the case of State of Alabama v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mahan v. Agee

    652 P.2d 765 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1982

    In Morrison v. … See: Morrison v. Roberts, supra; Oklahoma Secondary Schools Activities Ass’n. v. Midget, supra; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brison v. McKellop

    41 Okla. 374 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1914

    A. 623; Multer v. Knibbs, 193 Mass. 556 , 79 N. E. 762 , 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 322; 9 Ann. Cas. 958; Brown v. Brown, 124 N. C. 19 , 32 S. E. 320 , 70 Am. St. Rep. 574 ; Leavell v. Leavell, 122 Mo. App. 654 , 99 S. … Bennett v. Smith, 21 Barb. (N. Y.) 439; Pollock v. Pollock, 9 Misc. Rep. 82 , 29 N. Y. Supp. 37 ; White v. Ross, 47 Mich. 172 , 10 N. W. 188 ; Westlake v. Westlake, 34 Ohio St. 621 [ 32 Am. Rep. 397 ]; Brown v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Lowery v. Water Improvement Dist. No. 5

    122 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

    Edwards v. … In Riley v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Austin-Western Road MacHinery Co. v. Broard of Com'rs of Carter County

    160 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

    No. 1 v. Foster Dumber Co., cited supra, holds favorable to plaintiff. … This court had chapter 49, supra, under consideration in the case of Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, Co. Treas., 142 Okla. 8 , 285 P. 48 , and at page 15 of Okla.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Blake

    154 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1932

    In the recent case of State v. State ex rel. … CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. LESTEER, C. J., absent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Malibie

    630 P.2d 310 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1981

    In Board of Com’rs of Logan County v. State ex. rel. … In 1936, in the case of Board of Com’rs of LeFlore County v. Central Nat.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Tulsa City Lines, Inc.

    290 P.2d 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1955

    In his first proposition claimant asserts that under the rule announced in Bartlett-Collins Co. v. Roach, 180 Okl. 521 , 71 P.2d *127 489 and Brown & Root, Inc., v. … Referring to Brown & Root, Inc., v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Dixon v. Bhuiyan

    71 O.B.A.J. 1890 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 2000

    Hulett v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 1998 OK 21 , 956 P.2d 879, 881 . 3 . Meadows v. Fain, 1989 OK 100 , 776 P.2d 1270, 1272 . 4 . Russell v. Bd. of County Commrs., 1997 OK 80 , 952 P.2d 492, 496-97 . 5 . See Burk v. … See also Jones v. Univ. of Central Okla., 1995 OK 138 , 910 P.2d 987, 989 . 12 . Queen Anne Candy Co. v. Eagle, 1939 OK 177 , 88 P.2d 630, 631-32 . 13 . King-Stevenson Gas & Oil Co. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.