Case law

Franklin v. Ryan

125 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1927

Payne v. Ross, 95 Okla. 273 , 219 Pac. 144 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. … This court, in the case of Schaff, Receiver, v. Borum, County Treasurer, 82 Okla. 284 , 200 Pac. 191 , and Simmons v.

In Re First State Bank of Oklahoma City

68 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1918

Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 22 Okla. 48 , 97 Pac. 590 ; Id., 219 U. S. 104 , 31 Sup. Ct. 186, 55 L. Ed. 112 , 32 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1062, Ann. Cas. 1912A, 487; Lankford v. Platte Iron Works, 235 U. S. 461 , 35 Sup. … Noble State Bank v. Haskell, supra; In re Assessment First National Bank, supra.

State Ex Rel. Short v. Riedell

109 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1924

In Lehmann v. … Co. v.

CATHEY v. BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR McCURTAIN COUNTY

550 P.3d 910 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 2024

.]; Smith v. … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MCCURTAIN COUNTY Cited 1999 OK 50, 984 P.2d 194, 70 OBJ 1809, Osprey L.L.C. v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co. Cited 1985 OK 15, 695 P.2d 1352, Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.

Powers v. Van Dyke

27 Okla. 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

Brown, plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, sued B. F. Van Dyke, Rose Monlinari, and James A. … In Den v. Geiger, 9 N. J.

Wrightsman v. Stevenson

168 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1934

In the case of Price v. … Stuckey v. Kays, 119 Okla. 227 , 249 P. 416 ; Grotkop v. Stuckey, 140 Okla. 178 , 282 P. 611 ; Board of Com’rs of Garvin County v. Dennis. 140 Okla. 204 , 282 P. 457 .

Ex Parte Smith

49 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

In Town of Grove v. … .” *725 In Guernsey v.

Bonaparte v. Tradesmen's National Bank

175 Okla. 530 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1936

effect of which, is in controversy, the board- stated to Mr. … erroneous assessment to such board, as the law provides.

BREWER v. CITY OF SEMINOLE

326 P.3d 1143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 2014

1 Compare City of Coweta v. Doughten, 2011 OK Civ App 113, 264 P.3d 135 (Division Four) and White v. City of Del City, 2012 OK CIV APP 5 , 270 P.3d 205 (Division Two). … ANALYSIS 18 This Court's recent decision in City of Jenks v. Stone, 2014 OK 11 , 321 P.3d 179 , is dispositive of certified questions one and two now before us.

Roberts v. Ledgerwood

134 Okla. 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1928

One of the first cases on this subject is Burks v. … Dingeman v. Lacy, (Mich.) 146 N.

Hefner v. Cravens

189 Okla. 558 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1941

In Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Sutton, 185 Okla. 665 , 95 P. 2d 648 , this court considered the rule followed by such cases as Dixon v. Bowlegs, supra, as well as section 1.2628, supra. … Therefore, we think that as a matter of practical justice, the rule enunciated in Board of Com’rs of Tulsa Co. v. Sutton, supra, should be applied in all proper cases.

In Re Pierce's Appeal

347 P.2d 790 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1959

In this connection, see City of Idaho Falls v. Grimmett, 63 Idaho 90 , 117 P.2d 461 , citing McCurley v. City of El Reno, 138 Okl. 92 , 280 P. 467, 472 , and other cases. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, JACKSON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur. WELCH, J., dissents.

Boyd v. Robinson

47 Okla. 591 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

Brown, Polly Boyd, Laura Lock, Willard Brown, and D. J. Allen or Wofford, seeking to quiet title to cer *592 tain real estate in J. R. … Thompson et al. v. Fulton, 29 Okla. 700 , 119 Pac. 244 ; Kansas City, M. & O. R. Co. v. Williams, 33 Okla. 202 , 124 Pac. 63 ; American Nat. Bank v. Linotype Co., 31 Okla. 533 , 122 Pac. 507 ; Bowles et al. v.

Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Latty

77 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 6, 1920

In the case of Bass v. Concord St. Ry. … Co. v.

In Re Wickstrum

454 P.2d 660 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1969

School District No. 9 of Tulsa County v. … Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 .

Brians v. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 5, Okmulgee

183 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1938

In Board of Education of Town of Terral v. … To hold otherwise would be to say that the school board could do indirectly (by ratification) what it could not do directly (by contract).” In O’Neil Eng. Co. v.

In Re Hills

170 Okla. 427 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1935

Rowland, member of the Board of Governors. … MeNEILL, C. j., OSBORN, V. O. j., and BAYLESS and CORN, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Villines v. Freeman

370 P.2d 307 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1962

State Racing Commission v. Latonia Agricultural Ass’n., 136 Ky. 173 , 123 S.W. 681 , 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 905. … J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON,. IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur.

Truttman v. City of McAlester

206 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1952

In Dickey v. … Grigsby v.

PARSONS v. DISTRICT COURT OF PUSHMATAHA COUNTY

408 P.3d 586 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 2017

Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80 , 112 S.Ct. 1780, 1785 , 118 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992); see also Jones v. … Miller v. State, 1988 OK CR 29, ¶8 , 751 P.2d 733, 736-737 .