Case law

Ex Parte Smith

49 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

In Town of Grove v. … .” *725 In Guernsey v.

Bryant v. Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety

937 P.2d 496 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1997

It found that: 1) DPS failed to comply with the rules of the Board of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence; and 2) under Westerman v. … Rogers v. Higgins, 871 P.2d 398, 409 (Okla.1993); Cooper v. Dix, 771 P.2d 614, 617 (Okla.1989); Farris v. Cannon, 649 P.2d 529, 531 (Okla.1982). . Medina v. State, 871 P.2d 1379, 1383 (Okla.1993); Moore v.

Daniel v. Bound

184 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1938

See State v. Tomlinson, 20 Kan. 692 ; Alexander v. Pharr (N. C.) 103 S. E. 8 . … See Burchell v. State Board of Election Commissioners, 252 Ky. 823 ; Keogh v. Horner, 8 Fed. Supp. (D. C.) 933. The appeal is dismissed. OSBORN, C. X, BAYLESS, Y. C.

Wrightsman v. Stevenson

168 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1934

In the case of Price v. … Stuckey v. Kays, 119 Okla. 227 , 249 P. 416 ; Grotkop v. Stuckey, 140 Okla. 178 , 282 P. 611 ; Board of Com’rs of Garvin County v. Dennis. 140 Okla. 204 , 282 P. 457 .

Hartford Fire Ins. v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 73

121 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1926

In Wiley v. London & Lancashire, Fire Ins. Co. … Cone v. Century Fire Ins. Co. (Iowa) 117 N. W. 308 ; Weigan v. Council Bluffs Ins. Co. (Iowa) 73 N. W. 862 ; Cronenwett et al. v. Iowa Underwriters of Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance Co. et. al. (Cal.

City of Pond Creek v. Haskell

21 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 28, 1908

Boyd v. State, 53 Ala. 606 ; Adler v. State, 55 Ala. 21 .” … Watkins v. Eureka Springs, 49 Ark. 131, 134 , 4 S. W. 384 ; Geer v. Board of Com'rs of Ouray Co., 97 Fed. 435, 439 , 38 C. C. A. 250, 254 .

BREWER v. CITY OF SEMINOLE

326 P.3d 1143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 2014

1 Compare City of Coweta v. Doughten, 2011 OK Civ App 113, 264 P.3d 135 (Division Four) and White v. City of Del City, 2012 OK CIV APP 5 , 270 P.3d 205 (Division Two). … ANALYSIS 18 This Court's recent decision in City of Jenks v. Stone, 2014 OK 11 , 321 P.3d 179 , is dispositive of certified questions one and two now before us.

Bonaparte v. Tradesmen's National Bank

175 Okla. 530 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1936

effect of which, is in controversy, the board- stated to Mr. … erroneous assessment to such board, as the law provides.

Olson v. Logan County Bank

29 Okla. 391 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1911

Mathews v. Board of Corporation Commissioners, 97 Fed. 400 . … In Board of Education of City of Ardmore v.

York v. State Industrial Commission

201 Okla. 636 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1949

In Tulsa Hotel et al. v. Sparks et al., supra, in referring to and discussing the above-quoted case, we said: “Claimant therefore states that his claim was timely filed under the rule announced in Brown & Root, Inc., v. … v.

State v. Breckenridge, Superior Judge

43 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1914

Herndon v. Hammond, 28 Okla. 616 , 115 Pac. 775 ; Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Bartlesville, 27 Okla. 214 , 111 Pac. 207 ; Leedy v. Brown, 27 Okla. 489 , 113 Pac. 177 ; State ex rel. Attorney General v. … S.) 380; Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201, 109 Pac. 237 . Even if the trial court had been without jurisdiction of the cause, there is another reason why the writ should not issue at this time.

Dean v. City of New Cornell

151 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1931

S. 1921, and is still in force and effect, then the case of Berry v. City of Stillwater, 49 Okla. 560 , 153 P. 870 , would be controlling. Section 4593, C. O. … district, or board of education within the district to be assessed .

School Dist. No. 20 v. Walden

146 Okla. 19 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1930

Akin, County Superintendent, v. Harris, supra. … Baker v. Newton, 22 Okla. 658 , 98 Pac. 931 ; In re Benedictine Fathers of Sacred Heart Mission, 45 Okla. 358 , 145 Pac. 494 ; Parmenter v. Ray, County Judge, 58 Okla. 27 , 158 Pac. 1183 ; Grady County v.

Incorporated Town of Stigler v. Wiley

36 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1912

(Pinch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Everett v. Akins, 8 Okla. 184 , 56 Pac. 1062 ; Boyd v. Bryan, 11 Okla. 56 , 65 Pac. 940 .) … In Finch v. Brown, supra, it was held: “To consider this assignment would require us to review the evidence, but the case-made contains no recital or averment that it contains all the evidence introduced at the trial.

Lowden v. Luther

190 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1941

See Oklahoma City v. Grigsby, 171 Okla. 23 , 41 P. 2d 697 ; Dowell v. Board of Education, 185 Okla. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 ; State ex rel. Oklahoma State Highway Commission v. … Palmer, 13 Mich. 104 ; Thompson v. Abbott, 61 Mo. 176 ; Board of Education v. Board of Ed’n, 30 W. Va. 424 , 4 S. E. 640 ; Wilson v. School District, 233 Mich. 581 , 207 N. W. 810 ; Rapp v.

American-First National Bank v. Peterson

169 Okla. 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1934

See Grier v. Kramer et al., 62 Okla. 151 , 162 P. 490 ; Berryhill et al. v. City of Sapulpa, 97 Okla. 65 , 222 P. 555 ; Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 27 Okla. 247 , 111 P. 198 ; Flanagan v. … Co. v.

MAREE v. NEUWIRTH

374 P.3d 750 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 2016

Art. 7, § 4, Baby F. v. Oklahoma County Dist. Court, 2015 OK 24 , ¶ 8, 348 P.3d 1080 ; James v. Rogers, 1987 OK 20, ¶ 5 , 734 P.2d 1298 . … Baby F. v. Oklahoma County Dist. Court, 2015 OK 24 , ¶ 8, 348 P.3d 1080 ; James v.

State Ex Rel. Whetsel v. Wood

207 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1952

Jack Lincoln Shops, Inc., v. … In Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okla. 392 , 82 P. 2d 977 , 119 A. L.

Adams v. Mid-West Chevrolet Corp.

198 Okla. 461 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1946

In this connection, plaintiff cites Farwell v. Pyle-National Electric Headlight Co., 289 Ill. 157 , 124 N. E. 449 ; Bilby v. Morton, 119 Okla. 15 , 247 P. 384 ; Phelan v. … Bisbee v. Midland Linseed Products Co., 19 Fed. 2d 24; Keely v. Black, 91 N. J. Eq. 520 111 Atl. 22 . In Chenery Corporation v. Securities & Exch.

New v. Saunders

86 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1922

Moore v. St. Joseph & G. I. R. Co., 268 Mo. 31 , 186 S. W. 1035 ; Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Rigsby, 241 U. S. 33 , 60 L. Ed. 874 . In the case of Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. … Co. v.