Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.44s

  • Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Riddings v. Neville

    10 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1900

    West v. … In the case of Farely v. The Board of Commissioners, of Hamilton County, 126 Ind. 468 , it is held: “If the act of the board is purely ministerial or ad ministrative, no appeal lies.”

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. City of Stillwater

    461 P.2d 944 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1969

    On appeal, this Court upheld the decision of the Board. See Preston v. City of Stillwa-ter, Okl., 428 P.2d 215 . … See Finklestein v. City of Sapulpa, 106 Okl. 297 , 234 P. 187 ; and, Baxley v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Miles v. Parkinson

    193 Okla. 380 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1943

    Lillard v. Meisberger, 113 Okla. 228 , 240 P. 1067 . Plaintiff has urged in this appeal that he is entitled to judgment on the theory that delivery of the deed to the county treasurer constituted delivery to him. … On such new trial the issues will be limited under the rule announced in Holbrook v. Moore, 177 Okla. 173 , 58 P. 2d 865 , to the question of whether the purchaser was guilty of fraud.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Department of Corrections v. Brock

    513 P.2d 1293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1973

    State v. District Court of Nowata County, supra. The Court cited with approval the case of State ex rel. Cowan v. … State v. District Court of Bryan County, supra, 290 P.2d at 416-417 . The Supreme Court of Kansas has construed statutes identical to 12 O.S.1971, § 131 and § 133 in Huerter v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Kirk v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 1

    180 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1937

    The plaintiff also cites Board of Com’rs of McCurtain County v. … Another asserted justification for the judgment is that the contract is void because it was entered into by the two members of the school board as individuals and not as a board, —citing School District v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Grubb v. Johnson Oil Refining Co.

    198 Okla. 433 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1947

    Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board, 191 Okla. 586 , 131 P. 2d 745 . The listing by plaintiff was not an assessment. … Board of County Commissioners v. City of Clinton, 49 Okla. 795 , 154 P. 513 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sinclair-Prairie Oil Co. v. State

    169 Okla. 334 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1934

    The board of equalization is an administrative body. … J., CULLISON, V. O. J., and SWINDALL, McNEILL, BAYLESS, BUSBY, and WELCH, JJ., concur. ANDREWS, J., absent.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • O'Brien v. Gassoway

    125 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1927

    “To All To Whom These Presents M»v Oome. … S. 1921, and Garrett v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hatcher v. Roberson

    63 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1917

    Brown, under the deeds of January 5, 1904, and May 4, 1904, and which title to Brown was by him reeonveyed to Green Roberson, the father, and from him, through mesne conveyance, acquired by the original defendant, Henry Hatcher … C.) 199 Fed. 811 , United States v. Cook, 225 Fed. 756 , 141 C. C. A. 22 , Welty v. Reed, 219 Fed. 864 , 135 C. C. A. 534 , Rentie et al. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Stockholders of Commercial Nat. Bank of Muskogee

    125 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1927

    These statutes were before this court, and construed and passed upon, in Hopper v. … The decision in Hopper v. Oklahoma County, supra, passes upon the identical statute involved here, and upon the identical question presented here.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Omitted Assessment, Etc.

    125 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1927

    These statutes were before this court, and construed and passed upon, in Hopper v. … And in Hopper v. Oklahoma County, supra, this court held that: "Their action is final unless appealed from, and cannot be collaterally attacked."

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Corbeil v. Emricks Van & Storage, Guarantee Insurance

    404 P.3d 856 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2017

    Brown, 2017 OK 13 , ¶ 20, 391 P.3d 111 (quoting Wylie v. Chesser, 2007 OK 81, ¶ 19 , 173 P.3d 64 ). … Brown, 2017 OK 13 , ¶ 21, 391 P.3d 111 ; American Airlines, Inc. v. State ex rel. Okla. Tax Comm’n, 2014 OK 95 , ¶ 31, 341 P.3d 56 ; Colcord v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • BD. OF COUNTY COMM'RS v. ASSOC. OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF OKLA. SELF-INSURED GROUP

    485 P.3d 234 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 2021

    Â THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HARMON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. … v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.

    505 P.2d 1324 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1973

    Huston v. City of Miami, 98 Okl. 35 , 224 P. 316 (1924). O.G. & E. alleges that the contract was not valid until August 11, 1969 when it was accepted by the board of trustees of East Central. … Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. City of Hollis

    193 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1943

    Co. v. … To this extent Independent School Dist. v. Exchange Nat. Co., supra, First Nat. Bank v. Board of Education, 174 Okla. 164 , 49 P. 2d 1077 , and City of Shawnee v. Exchange Nat.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Sheldon

    135 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1929

    In State v. … In Hackfield & Co. v. United States, 49 L.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hamilton Twp. v. Underwood

    81 Okla. 256 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1921

    Sango v. Sparks, 44 Okla. 223 , 144 Pac. 1158 ; Postoak v. Lee, 46 Okla. 477 , 149 Pac. 155 ; Huff v. Lee, 46 Okla. 485 , 149 Pac. 158 ; Thompson v. … Wilkinson, 46 Okla. 115 , 148 Pac. 177 ; Washington County Abstract Co. v. Harris, 48 Okla. 577 , 149 Pac. 1075 ; Dunn v. Modern Foundry & Machinery Co., 51 Okla. 465 , 151 Pac. 893 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Bank of Picher v. Morris

    157 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

    Co. v. … “In Pitts v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee, 138 Okla. 284 , 281 P. 133 , this court said: “ ‘Every municipality must submit its-budget to the excise board of their respective counties. City of Sapulpa v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Porch v. Hayes

    205 Okla. 194 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1950

    Brown v. State Nat. Bank of Shawnee, 133 Okla. 173 , 271 P. 833 ; Myers v. Carr, 173 Okla. 335 , 47 P. 2d 156 ; Baker v. Home Building & Loan Ass’n, 179 Okla. 218 , 65 P. 2d 169 ; Jelks v. Aetna Life Ins. … Chaffin v. Excise Board of Okmulgee County, 172 Okla. 425 , 45 P. 2d 480 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Myers v. the First Presbyterian Church of Perry

    11 Okla. 544 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1902

    (Cook et. al. v. Burnham et. al., 3 Kan. App. 27.) This brings us to the consideration of the evidence on the demurrer. … He may be commissioned as a missionary by the mission board, and his compensation fixed in whole or in part by the board.

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.