Case law

Missouri, K. v. Walker, Cty. Treas.

54 Okla. 359 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1916

Section 7380' provides: “The excise board shall meet at the county seat on the last Saturday of July of each year for the purpose of examining the estimates of expenses for the county and for each city, town, board of education … Co. v. Beatty, 34 Okla. 321 , 118 Pac. 367 , 126 Pac. 736 , 42 L. R. A. (N. S.) 984; St. L., etc., R. Co. v. Zalonde k et al., 28 Okla. 746 , 115 Pac. 867 .

Coon v. Boston Insurance Co.

79 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1920

Oklahoma State Bank v. Airington, 68 Oklahoma, 172 Pac. 462 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Jackson, 63 Oklahoma, 162 Pac. 823 ; Henderson v. Coleman (Wyo) 115 Pac. 439 ; 16 Cyc. 1003; 10.R. C. L. 989. … Dietrich v. Dr. Koch Veg. Tea Co., 56 Okla. 636 , 156 Pac. 188 ; Cook Co. Liq. Co. v. Brown, 31 Okla. 614 , 122 Pac. 167 ; Knott v. Peterson, 125 Iowa 404 , 101 N. W 173; Lee v Brown, 21 Kan. 458 ; Blair v.

Norton v. Hughes

5 P.3d 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 2000

Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32 , ¶ 5 n. 1, 935 P.2d 319 , 321 n. 1; Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22, n. 30 , 989 P.2d 448 , 456 n. 30. … Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 8 , 989 P.2d 448, 452 . 111 The sovereign state of Texas has not conferred upon Oklahoma attorneys the right to practice law within its borders.

Hayes v. Arch

183 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1938

Brown filed December 17, 1931, was denied. The motion of J. A. Brown filed April 29, 1933, was overruled. … The Court of Appeals of Kentucky in the case of Blakeley’s Adm’x v. Hughes, 130 S. W. 1067 , reaffirmed a decision theretof«ffe made in Cowper v.

Green-Boots Construction Co. v. State Highway Commission

139 Okla. 108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1929

In Whitehead v. Gray, 12 N. J. L. 38, commenting on the case of Ludlow v. Executors (N. J. … Ray, 58 Okla. 27 , 158 Pac. 1183 ; Montgomery v. State Election Boards 27 Okla. 324 , 111 Pac. 447 ; Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com., 24 Okla. 204 , 103 Pac. 691 ; Palmer v.

Youngblood v. Consolidated School District No. 3

104 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1924

The power tO' contract for the construction of such schoolhouse is lodged in the district board. School District No. 39 v. Shelton, 26 Okla. 229 , 109 Pac. 67 . And section 10382, Comp. … Bank of Hobart v. School Dist. 56, Kiowa County, 35 Okla. 506 , 130 Pac. 549 ; Weitz v. Independent School District of Des Moines et al., 78 Iowa, 37 . Section 10393, Comp.

Vogel v. Corporation Commission

190 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1942

State v. Cobb, 24 Okla. 662 , 104 P. 361 , 24 L.R.A. (N. S.) 639. See, also, Baker v. Newton, 27 Okla. 436 , 112 P. 1034 ; Mathews v. Sniggs, 75 Okla. 108 , 182 P. 703 ; Keeter v. … See Burke & Brown v. Territory, 2 Okla. 499 , 37 P. 829 ; 35 C. J. 194, note 19; 6 R.C.L. 522, note 11; 12 Am. Jur. 429 , note 17.

Fowler v. Green

73 Okla. 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1918

the order of the board of education. … In the case of School District No. 36 of Montgomery County v.

Pickell v. Combs

184 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1939

Monsell v. Excise Bd. of Tulsa County, 142 Okla. 130 , 285 P. 836 ; St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Choctaw County Excise Board, 173 Okla. 312 , 48 P.2d 312 . … The school board was without authority to contract with the teachers for an amount in excess of the estimate approved by the excise board for the fiscal year for such purpose. Lacey et al. v.

Burger v. Richards

380 P.2d 687 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1963

In Ryburn v. … See The Executive Committee of American Legion, etc. v. Hardy, Okl., 300 P.2d 663 ; and Kay Pharmacal Company v. Dalious Construction Company, Old., 276 P.2d 756 .

Oklahoma Public Welfare Commission v. State Ex Rel. Thompson

187 Okla. 654 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1940

United States v. Sing Tuck, 194 U. S. 161 , 48 L. Ed. 917 ; Town of Kearney v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 103 N. J. L. 26, 135 A. 61 . … Ed. 408 (shipping board); DePauw University v. Brunk, D. C., 53 F. 2d 647, 652 ; Palermo Land & Water Co. v. Railroad Commission, D. C., 227 F. 708 ; Hammerstrom v. Toy Nat.

Green Construction Co. v. Oklahoma Count's

174 Okla. 290 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1935

Muskogee County v. Lanning & McRoberts, 51 Okla. 343 , 151 P. 1054 ; Charles Smith v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 619 , 166 P. 463 . … Sizemore et al. v. Dill, 93 Okla. 176 , 220 P. 352 ; Jones et al. v. Security State Bank of Frederick, 120 Okla. 231 , 251 P. 65 .

Protest of Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

149 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1931

v. … W. 548 ; Avant v. Flynn, 2 S. D. 153, 49 N. W. 15 ; Wisconsin Cent. Ry. Co. v. Lincoln Co., 67 Wis. 478 , 30 N. W. 619 ; Chesnut v. Elliott, 61 Miss. 569 ; Odiorne v. Rand, 69 N. H. 504; Fifield v.

Going v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

106 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1925

City of Durant v. Bonner, 86 Okla. 280 , 208 Pac. 825 . … It is evident that the excise board-had omitted to levy in previous years for the benefit of the sinking fund, a sum equal to the shortage existing in the sinking fund to the extent of $12,000.- The excise board classified

Stidham v. Special Indemnity Fund

10 P.3d 880 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 2000

State Industrial Commission, 1952 OK 307 , 248 P.2d 616, 619 ; Scott v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County, 1941 OK 379 , 119 P.2d 56, 57 . 17 . … Velvet Dove Restaurant, 1988 OK 68 , 756 P.2d 1232, 1234 ; Pirrong v. Pirrong, 1976 OK 36 , 552 P.2d 383, 387 ; Pointer v. Hill, 1975 OK 73 , 536 P.2d 358, 361 ; Brown v.

Independent School Dist. No. 39 of Creek County v. Exchange National Co.

164 Okla. 176 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1933

In the case of Board of Commissioners of Ness County v. … Johns v. Board of County Commissioners of Stafford County (Kan.) 205 P. 1033 ; City of Wichita v. Board of Education (Kan.) 142 P. 946 .

Harden v. Morris

198 Okla. 398 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1947

After this annexation a school board election was held in district No. 29, and plaintiff was issued his certificate of election as a school board member. … Dorland v. County Election Board, etc., 180 Okla. 334 , 69 P. 2d 35 , and authorities cited therein. Appeal dismissed. HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, GIBSON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Fent v. State ex rel. Department of Human Services

236 P.3d 61 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 2010

Farabee v. Board of Trustees, Lee County Law Library, 254 So.2d 1 (Fla.1971). The court distinguished and receded from Flood v. … See Browning v.

Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Ray v. Jacobs

12 Okla. 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 2, 1902

, city assessor, and also two members of school board and 'two members of city council for each ward; and the law provides for only one member of the council and one member of *154 tbe school board to be elected irom each … In the case of Wright v.

Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Riddings v. Neville

10 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1900

West v. … In the case of Farely v. The Board of Commissioners, of Hamilton County, 126 Ind. 468 , it is held: “If the act of the board is purely ministerial or ad ministrative, no appeal lies.”