Case law

Frisco Lumber Co. v. Thomas

42 Okla. 670 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1914

opening left by the removal of the boards. … Co. v.

Gruger v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

192 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1943

Anderson-Kerr, Inc., v. Van Meter, 162 Okla. 176 , 19 P. 2d 1068 ; Blevins v. Harris, 172 Okla. 90 , 44 P. 2d 112 . … Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Kite, 167 Okla. 359 , 29 P. 2d. 942.

BOLER v. SECURITY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.

336 P.3d 468 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2014

Brown and Root, Inc., 1992 OK 114 , ¶ 13, 836 P.2d 1298, 1301 . See also Haws v. Luethje, 1972 OK 146, ¶ 13 , 503 P.2d 871 . … See Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1201 , 182 LEd.2d 42 (2012)(per cu-riam).

Weeden v. Arnold

5 Okla. 578 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

Arnold, president of the board of health, the fees required by the rules and regulations of the board for such certificate; but the statute nowhere makes the president of the board of health the proper officer to whom to … There is nothing in the cases of Barmore v. Dickson, 28 Pac. 8 , and Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114 , relied upon by counsel for petitioner, that conflicts with the views herein expressed.

Gripe v. Hatmaker

189 Okla. 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1941

In Bowles v. … Bowles v. Brown, supra. The defendants also contend that the evidence as to permanent damage to real property is not sufficient to sustain a verdict. In Gries v.

Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical College v. Willis

6 Okla. 593 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1898

Hamilton Co. v. Mighels, 7 Ohio St. 109 ; Finch v. Board of Education, 30 Id. 37; Manuel v. Comm’rs., 98 N. C. 9—3 S. E. 829; Dosdall v. County Com’rs. [Minn.] 14 N. W. 458 ; Eastman v. Clackamas Co., 32 Fed. 24 .) … In Finch v.

Going v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. CO.

88 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1923

The excise board then appropriated $50,000 for that purpose. … Co. v. Walker, Co. Treas., 54 Okla. 359 , 154 Pac. 343 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Caldwell, Co. Treas., 75 Okla. 153 , 182 Pac. 688 .

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

150 Okla. 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1931

The protestee contends that no such transfer could be made and that the rale an *170 nounced in Dickinson v. Blackwood, 76 Okla. 175 , 184 Pac. 582 , Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, Co. … Co. v. Washington County, 136 Okla. 191 , 276 Pac. 769 . To determine the question we must determine whether the transfer of funds was within the current expense fund or from the current expense fund to a special fund.

Vogel v. Corporation Commission

190 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1942

State v. Cobb, 24 Okla. 662 , 104 P. 361 , 24 L.R.A. (N. S.) 639. See, also, Baker v. Newton, 27 Okla. 436 , 112 P. 1034 ; Mathews v. Sniggs, 75 Okla. 108 , 182 P. 703 ; Keeter v. … See Burke & Brown v. Territory, 2 Okla. 499 , 37 P. 829 ; 35 C. J. 194, note 19; 6 R.C.L. 522, note 11; 12 Am. Jur. 429 , note 17.

In Re Texas Co.'s Assessment

168 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1934

The case of New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 121 Okla. 277 , 249 P. 914 , also relied upon by plaintiff, is not in point. … Meriwether v. Lovett, 166 Okla. 73 , 26 P. (2d) 200 .

Jones v. Blaine

149 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1931

The record is silent as to whether or not the reports required by section 9697, Id., were transmitted to the excise board. Under the rule announced in Bonaparte v. … In Pottawatomie County v.

Gammill v. Shackelford

480 P.2d 920 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1970

Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 ; Dillard v. Sappington, 151 Okl. 47 , 1 P.2d 748 ; State ex rel. State Com’rs of Land Office v. Weems, 197 Okl. 106 , 168 P.2d 629 . … McCarty v. Cain, 27 Okl. 82 , 110 P. 653 ; State ex rel. Freeling v. Sullivan, 80 Okl. 81 , 194 P. 446 ; Smith et al. v. State ex rel. Barry Co. Atty., 84 Okl. 283 , 203 P. 1046 ; Wallace v.

Green Construction Co. v. Oklahoma Count's

174 Okla. 290 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1935

Muskogee County v. Lanning & McRoberts, 51 Okla. 343 , 151 P. 1054 ; Charles Smith v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 619 , 166 P. 463 . … Sizemore et al. v. Dill, 93 Okla. 176 , 220 P. 352 ; Jones et al. v. Security State Bank of Frederick, 120 Okla. 231 , 251 P. 65 .

City of Tulsa v. Crain

573 P.2d 707 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1978

J., LAVENDER, V. C. J., and WILLIAMS, IRWIN, BERRY and BARNES, JJ., concur. . Tulsa — Rev. … Harrell v. Horton, 401 P.2d 461 (Okl.1965). . See Donovan v. City of Santa Monica, 88 Cal.App.2d 386 , 199 P.2d 51 (1949). . Semke v. State ex rel.

Anderson v. Ritterbusch

22 Okla. 761 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1908

W. 473, 944 ; Ramsey Co. v. Ry. Co., 33 Minn. 537 , 24 N. W. 313 ; People v. Board, 92 N. Y. 430 ; City of Wheeling v. Hawley, 18 W. Va. 472 ; Harwood v. N. Brookfield, 130 Mass. 561 ; Hubbard v. … Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall. 277, 325 , 18 L. Ed. 356 ; County of Redwood v. Winona & St. P. Land Co., 40 Minn. 512 , 41 N. W. 465 , 42 N W. 473; County of Brown v. Winona & St. P.

Stephenson v. Dudley

191 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1942

In Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of City of Marietta v. … The only question before the trial court was one of jurisdiction, and as stated in Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of City of Marietta v.

Wallace v. Gassaway

148 Okla. 265 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1931

Board of Dental Examiners v. Pollock, 125 Okla. 170 , 256 Pac. 927 ; Stout v. State ex rel. Caldwell, 36 Okla. 744 , 130 Pac. 553 , 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 884, Ann. Cas. 1916E, 858. … This court in Redcorn v.

Societe Titanor v. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works

172 Okla. 213 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1935

Prescott v. Brown, 30 Okla. 428 , 120 P. 991 . … Cited and followed in Cavanagh v. Johannessen, 57 Okla. 149 , 156 P. 289 . The statement of the court in Brown v.

Fowler v. Green

73 Okla. 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1918

the order of the board of education. … In the case of School District No. 36 of Montgomery County v.

Ferrell v. Town of Mountain View

127 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1927

The board of trustees could not, by such an unauthorized order or resolution, bind the town and release the treasurer from liabil- Counsel for plaintiff in error cite the case. of State ex rel. v. … PlaIntiff also cites the cue of Stephens v. City of Ludlow (Ky.) 169 S. W. 473 , and the case of Commonwealth v. Godshaw (Ky.) 17 S. W. 737 .