Case law

State Ex Rel. Matlack v. Oklahoma City

38 Okla. 349 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1913

See; also, Board of Horn., etc., v. Hart, 29 Okla. 693 , 119 Pac. 132 , 37 L. R. A. (N. S.) 388. Volume 8 of Words and Phrases, p. 6920, cites Lexington v. Bennick, 105 Ky. 779 , 49 S. W. 787 , 50 S. … Rumbold v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com. v. Tulsa Flower Exchange

192 Okla. 293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1943

Personal influence was the only instrument at his command in dealing with the board of directors concerning control of the corporation. It was said, however, in Gaines v. Gaines Bros. … The rule stated in Benner-Coryell Lumber Co. v. Indiana Unemployment Compensation Board, 218 Ind. 20 , 29 N. E. 2d 776 , should be followed here.

State ex rel. Independent School District No. 1 of Oklahoma County v. Barnes

762 P.2d 921 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1988

Davis v. Davis, 708 P.2d 1102 (Okl.1985), Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 (Okl.1973), and State ex rel. Ogden v. Hunt, 286 P.2d 1088 (Okl.1955). … Oldham v. Drummond Board of Education of Independent School District No. I-85, 542 P.2d 1309 (Okl.1975).

American Asbestos Products Co. v. Independent School Dist. No. 14

196 Okla. 274 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1945

A legal and binding contract against a school district can be made only by its board of education in regular session. Board of Education of Town of Carney v. … School board members who sign such a written order and procure delivery of the supplies ordered thereby are personally liable thereon. Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136 , 20 L.

Utley v. Rowe

192 Okla. 546 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1943

Petitioner relies upon Brown v. Brown, 150 Okla. 217 , 1 P. 2d 167 , and Baker v. Carter, 180 Okla. 71 , 68 P. 2d 85 . … See, also, Whitney v. Whitney, 192 Okla. 174 , 134 P. 2d 357 ; Krauter v. Krauter, 79 Okla. 30 , 190 P. 1088 ; and Whitebird et al. v. Luckey, 180 Okla. 1 , 67 P. 2d 775 .

ANAGNOST v. TOMECEK

2017 OK 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 2017

Prince, Trial Judge ¶0 After the Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision (Board) began investigating the plaintiff/appellant, Dr. … Anagnost discovered additional information from the Board's file, he filed an amended petition asserting additional claims against the Board and certain Board members.

Protest of Trimble

151 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1931

Board of Education v. … Excise Board, 86 Okla. 24 , 206 Pac. 517 . We agree with that contention. In Excise Board of Woodward County v.

Carter v. Collins

174 Okla. 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1935

In Wenner v. Board of Education, 25 Okla. 515 , 106 P. 821 , this court considered an action in mandamus to require the treasurer of a board of education to pay certain judgments. … S. 17 , on review from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, Board of Com’rs of Love County v. Ward, 68 Okla. 287 , 173 P. 1050 .

Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. State Bd. of Equal.

174 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

Bonaparte, County Treas., v. American First National Bank, 139 Okla. 189 , 281 P. 958 ; Board of County Comissioners of Oklahoma County v. … State Board of Equalization, 155 Okla. 183 , 8 P. (2d) 732 ; Comanche County et al. v. American National Bank of Lawton, 122 Okla. 34 , 252 P. 408 . In Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v.

Sanford v. Howard

185 Okla. 660 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1939

Co. v. … WELCH, V. O. J., and CORN, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., dissent.

Rountree v. Phelps

200 Okla. 528 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1948

Notable among these decisions are: Riley v. Carter, State Auditor, 165 Okla. 262 , 25 P. 2d 666 ; Edwards v. Carter, State Auditor, 167 Okla. 287 , 29 P. 2d 610 ; State ex rel. Telle v. … Carter, State Auditor, 170 Okla. 50 , 39 P. 2d 134 ; and Battles v. Childers, State Auditor, 177 Okla. 589 , 61 P. 2d 253 .

Wentz v. Ingenthron

146 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1930

In the case of Thompson v. … Allen v. Board of County Commissioners, supra, and Leininger v. Ward, 126 Okla. 114 , 258 Pac. 863 .

Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.

23 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1909

In the case of Board of County Commissioners v. … Hoff, 80 Cal. 81 , 22 Pac. 69 , and Sage et al. v. Brown, 34 Ind. 464 . In Re City of Kingfisher v.

Abel v. Madden

738 P.2d 1340 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1987

The applicable statutes and the authority of county excise boards was discussed by this Court in Summey v. Tisdale, 658 P.2d 464, 468-70 (Okla.1982) and Rogers v. … See Little v.

Ryan v. Roach Drug Co.

113 Okla. 130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

In the case of Sapulpa v. … Mueller v Thompson, supra.”

Kerr, County Clerk v. State Ex Rel. Wimbish

33 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

This act was construed by the Supreme Court of the territory of Oklahoma in the case of Huddleston v. Board of Com’rs of Noble Co., 8 Okla. 614 , 58 Pac. 749 . … Newell v. People, 7 N. Y. 9, 97 ; Hills v. Chicago, 60 Ill. 86 ; Denn v. Reid, 10 Pet. 524 [ 9 L. Ed. 519 ]; Leonard v. Wiseman, 31 Md. 201, 204 ; People v. Potter, 47 N. Y. 375 ; Cooley, Const.

Cage v. Cansler

119 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1926

Wallace v. Trustees, 194 Pa. 178 . *37 As was said by Chief Justice Burford in Myers v. … Dubs et al. v. Egli et al., 167 Ill. 514 . The holders of the legal and equitable title not being parties to the action, the court was without jurisdiction to decree a sale of the church property. Huffines v.

Wood v. Phillips

95 Okla. 255 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

The next witness introduced by the plaintiff was one John Ward, who testified that he was a member of the board of county commissioners of Coal county, and was chairman of the board, that he was. acquainted with the claims … but they had such interest in the effort of the plaintiff to secure a judgment against said county, based upon illegal claims, as entitled them to be made parties to this suit, under authority of the case of Threadgill v.

Stillwater Indus. Found., Inc. v. STATE EX REL. BD. OF REGENTS

541 P.2d 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1975

The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Board of County Commissioners, 10 Cir., 361 F.2d 932 . In Palmer v. … In the case of Stewart v.

Marshall v. Sitton

68 Okla. 175 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1918

In State v. … State v. Brown, 8 Okla. Cr. 40 , 126 Pac. 245 , Ann. Cas. 1914C. 394; Ex parte Hudson, 3 Okla. Cr. 393 , 106 Pac. 540 , 107 Pac. 735 ; Long v. Allen, Judge, 10 Okla. Cr. 182 , 135 Pac. 443 .