Case law

Leonard v. City of Wagoner

178 Okla. 553 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1936

Land, 101 Okla. 22 , 223 P. 640 ; Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 101 Okla. 151 , 224 P. 969 ; Ryan v. Roach Drug Co., 113 Okla. 130 , 239 P. 912 ; Ryan v. Cook Building & Investment Co., 113 Okla. 78 , 239 P. 919 ; Jones v. … Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 118 Okla. 201 , 248 P. 336 ; Smith v. City of Tahlequah, 145 Okla. 103 , 291 P. 981 ; Zachary v. City of Wagoner, supra; and Public Service Company of Oklahoma v.

Trask v. Johnson

452 P.2d 575 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1969

As we understand it, the rule most favorable to the petitioners, set forth in cases such as Smith v. … The same basic principle, varied with the circumstances, quoted from Hemmer v. United States, 204 F. 898 , 123 C.C.A. 194 , is stated by this court in Crosbie v.

Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan Ministry

69 O.B.A.J. 1394 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1997

Brown v. Nicholson, Pate, and Spears, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . Issues of law are reviewable by a de novo standard. … Brown, supra, note 1 at V 6, at 321. 10 . Brown, supra, note 1 at ¶ 6, at 321; Henryetta Construction Co., v. Harris, 1965 OK 88 , 408 P.2d 522, 531-532 (1965). 11 . Brown, supra, note 1 at ¶ 11, at 322. 12 .

Parkinson v. Valente

326 P.2d 826 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1958

In State v. State ex rel. … Keaton v. Bonaparte, 174 Okl. 316 , 50 P.2d 404 ; Lairmore v. Board of Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 200 Okl. 436 , 195 P.2d 762 ; Billingsley v. North, Okl., 298 P.2d 418 . It is dispositive of this appeal.

Protest of McClaskey

170 Okla. 512 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

The appellees contend that the rule of law announced by this court in the Downing Case, supra, and in the cases of *Page 513 Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 P. 423 , Gulf, C. S. F. Railway Co. v. … Excise Board, 141 Okla. 34 , 283 P. 1003 , and Protest of Bledsoe, 161 Okla. 227 , 17 P.2d 979 , to the effect that if an amount is illegally transferred from one fund to another fund, the amount of cash on hand in the second

Broadwell v. Dirickson

85 Okla. 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1922

See Xeargain v. Sutter, So Okla. 41, 204 Pac. 122 ; Henryetta Spelter Co. v. Guernsey, 82 Okla. 71 , 198 Pac. 495 ; Smith v. Moon Buggy Co., 66 Okla. 333 , 169 Pac. 875 ; Franklin v. … Clerk, v. McDaniels Auto Co., 69 Oklahoma, 170 Pac. 899 ; State ex rel. Friend v. Cummings, 47 Okla. 44 , 147 Pac. 161 ; State ex rel. v. Ross, 76 Okla. 11 , 183 Pac. 918 .

McAndrew v. McAndrew

168 Okla. 78 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1934

The defendant in his brief quotes at length from Greenshaw v. Brown, 96 Okla. 11 , 219 P. 934 . That was a case dealing with real property claimed to be exempt as a homestead. … The instant case, therefore, does not come within the rule announced in Greenshaw v. Brown, mpra, but does come within the rule stated in the case of Trower et al. v.

Knight v. Herndon Drilling Company

296 P.2d 158 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1955

The first of these, the “Brown No. 1”, was a direct western offset to the Knight No. 1; the second, the “Brown No. 2”, was a direct northern offset to the Brown No-. 1, and the third, known as the “Brown No. 3”, which was … Defendant also calls our attention to Shell Oil Co. v. Howell, 208 Okl. 598 , 258 P.2d 661 , and Shell Oil Co. v.

Garrett v. Watson

342 P.2d 560 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1959

In Robberson v. Board of County Com’rs, Okl., 302 P.2d 784 , we cited Fletcher v. Board of County Com’rs, supra, as authority for affirming. In Fletcher v. … See, in this connection, Stuart v. King, 203 Okl. 23 , 217 P.2d 540 , cited in Chandler Materials Co. v. Board of County Commissioners, supra.

NICHOLS v. ZIRIAX

518 P.3d 883 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2022

NICHOLS v. … the Oklahoma State Election Board; JERRY BUCHANAN, Alternate Member of the Oklahoma State Election Board; DEBI THOMPSON, Alternate Member of the Oklahoma State Election Board; and THE HONORABLE J.

In Re Assessment of Property of Western Light & Power Corp.

169 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1934

The assessment was made in that amount by the State Board of Equalization. … Travis v. Dickey, Co. Treas., et al., 96 Okla. 256 , 222 P. 527 ; Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield, 247 U. S. 350 , 62 L. Ed. 1154 .

Continental Oil Company v. Ryan

392 P.2d 492 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1963

In Wright v. … In Beasley v.

City of Stillwater v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 2095

238 P.3d 926 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 2010

City of Bethany v. … City of Del City v. FOP, Lodge No. 114, 1993 OK 169 ¶ 5 , 869 P.2d 309, 311 .

Mayer v. J.T. Jones Sons

113 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1925

Newell v. People, 7 N. Y. 97 ; Hills v. Chicago, 60 Ill. 86 ; Denn v. Reid, 35 U. S. 10 Pet. 524 (9:159); Leonard v. Wiseman, 31 Md. 204 ; People v. Potter, 47 N. Y. 375 ; Cooley, Const. … Clerk, v.

State Ex Rel. Wall v. Holder

279 P.2d 1098 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1955

In Little v. … Dawson v. Dinwiddie, 186 Okl. 63 , 95 P.2d 867 , Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 147 Okl. 126 , 295 P. 223 , and cases there cited.

Hayes v. Osborn

195 Okla. 612 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1945

Everly v. Zepp (Dist. Ct. E. D. Pa.), 57 Fed. Supp. 303; Ward v. Bochino (S. C. Onandago County), 46 N. Y. Supp. 2d 54; Zwang v. A. & P. Food Stores (1944), 181 Misc. 375 , 46 N. Y. Supp. 2d 747; Brown v. … I thought at the time perhaps she had gotten a raise from the rent board and raised it, and I didn’t find out until later on that she hadn’t. Q.

Oklahoma Industries Authority v. Barnes

769 P.2d 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1988

This position was reaffirmed in Board of Johnson County Com'rs v. … Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034, 1042-1043 [1955]. . 68 O.S.1981 § 2419; Jenkins v. Frederick, supra note 4 ; State v. Shamblin, supra note 4 , State v.

Exchange Oil Co. v. State

80 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1920

An appeal may be had from the decision of the State Board of Equalization thereon, by any person aggrieved, to the Supreme Court, in like manner and with like effect as provided by law in other appeals from said board to … No. 2, p. 1423; Ety v. Thoushly, 73 Mich. 123 ; Snyder v. Marks, 109 U. S. 189 ; Street Railway Tax Cases, 92 U. S. 613 ; Shelton v. Platt, 139 U. S. 591 .

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wiggins

5 Okla. 477 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

In the case of The Board of Commissioners of Osborne County v. … In the case of Libby v.

Berryman v. Bonaparte

155 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

See, also, Oklahoma City v. Coombs, 125 Okla. 194 , 257 P. 295 ; Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v. … McMahan v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 142 Okla. 110 , 285 P. 953 ; Protest of Trimble, 151 Okla. 74 , 300 P. 406 .