Case law

Parks v. Lyons

183 Okla. 529 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1938

Rogers [1932] 158 Okla. 163 , 13 P.2d 170 ; Brown v. Clark [1937] 181 Okla. 473 , 74 P.2d 933 ; Stewart v. Burrows [1920] 80 Okla. 23 , 193 P. 881 ; Popp v. … Coon *533 [1923] 93 Okla. 62 , 218 P. 701 ; Clark v. Board of County Commissioners [1930] 143 Okla. 18 , 285 P. 127 ).

Morley v. Hurst

174 Okla. 2 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1935

In the case of In re Barry’s Appeal, Barry et al. v. … OSBORN, V. O. J., and RILEY, J., dissent.

Mathews v. Ward

96 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1923

Brown, administrator of the estate of Paul Ward, deceased, filed a motion to dismiss the proceeding and for grounds alleges: That Paul Ward died on or about the 28th day of July, 1922 and H. B. … The facts in this case come squarely within the facts in the ease of Hester v. Gilbert, 43 Okla. 400 , 143 Pac. 189 . Upon authority of said cause, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Riley, County Clerk v. Carico

27 Okla. 33 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

In the case of Jones et al. v. … Oklahoma City v. Shields, 22 Okla. 265, 100 Pac. 559 ; Norris et al v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287 , 105 Pac. 1000 ; In re Menefee, 22 Okla. 365 , 97 Pac. 1014 .

Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Cowden

184 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1939

Section 6860, supra, as construed in the case of Wichita Board of Education v. Barrett, supra, is a statute such as is referred to in the text. … See Wichita Board of Education v. Barrett, supra.

Tenneco Oil Company v. Allen

515 P.2d 1391 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1973

See also Sunray D-X Oil Company v. Brown (1970), Okl., 477 P.2d 67 , wherein this court held that damages resulting from an oil and gas operation can be recovered in an action brought on a nuisance theory. … Compare, however, Sunray D-X Oil Company v. Brown, supra.

Union State Bank of Shawnee v. Mueller

68 Okla. 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1918

Co. v. Austin, 63 Okla. 169 , 163 Pac. 517 , L. R. A. 191711, 666, and eases cited. … Brown, president of the company, who had formerly been a partner with M. O.

McDonald, Adm'r v. Strawn

78 Okla. 271 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1920

Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 145 Fed. 151 . … Eli Mining & Land Co. v. Garleton, 108 Fed. 24 ; U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 145 Fed. 144 ; Seeman v. Levine, 205 N. Y. 514 , 99 N. E. 158 . 3.

Cash v. Beveridge

183 Okla. 310 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1938

See Southwest Petroleum Co. v. Logan, 180 Okla. 477 , 71 P.2d 759 ; Smith Oil Co. v. Logan (Black et al., Interveners), 180 Okla. 474 , 71 P.2d 766 . … BATLESS, V. 0. J., and RILEY, CORN, and HURST, JJ., concur.

Stine v. Lewis, Sheriff

33 Okla. 609 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1912

See City of Kansas City et al. v. Union Pacific Ry. Co. et al., 59 Kan. 427 , 53 Pac. 468 , 52 L. R. A. 321; Dejarnett v. Haynes, 23 Miss. 600 ; Sullivan, etc., v. Berry's Adm’r, 83 Ky. 198 , 4 Am. St. … State v. Railway Co., 76 Kan. 467 , 92 Pac. 606 . To the same effect is Schaake v. Dolley, 85 Kan. 598 , 118 Pac. 80 [37 L. R. A. (N.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Eldredge

67 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1917

Co. v. … Black v. Geissler v. 58 Okla. 335 *112 159 Pac. 1124 ; Huber v. Akers, 66 Okla. 11 , 166 Pac. 892 .

Carpet City, Inc. v. Stillwater Municipal Hospital Authority

536 P.2d 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1975

See United Benefit Life Insurance Company v. … Austin v. State Board of Education, 497 P.2d 218 (Okla.1972).

Welch v. Bohart

40 Okla. 439 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1914

Alluwee Oil Co. v. Shufflin et al., 32 Okla. 808 , 124 Pac. 15 ; Fearnow et al. v. Jones et al., 34 Okla. 694 , 126 Pac. 1015 ; Citizens’ Trading Co. v. Bass, 30 Okla. 747 , 120 Pac. 1095 ; Acton v. … Alluwee Oil Co. v.

Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

68 O.B.A.J. 559 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1997

See Excise Board of Grady County v. … See Board of County Commissioners of Osage County v.

Jones v. Blaine

149 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1931

The record is silent as to whether or not the reports required by section 9697, Id., were transmitted to the excise board. Under the rule announced in Bonaparte v. … In Pottawatomie County v.

School Dist. No. 76 v. Bath

120 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1926

Between the date of plaintiff’s contract with the school board and the time fixed by the contract for beginning the school term, there was a change in the personnel of the school board, two members having-retired, and the … year for services then to be performed, is violative of the intent and purpose of section 26, article 10 of the state Constitution, as declared in Gentis v.

Cotton v. Blake

133 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1928

In Carroll v. … This question was settled in Board of Com’rs of Canadian County v. Tinklepaugh, 49 Okla. 440 , 152 Pac. 1119 ; and in Carrico v. Crocker, 38 Okla. 440 , 133 Pac. 181 .

In Re New State Life Ins. Co.

164 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1933

Brown and H. O. Brown had been released. … Bk. v. Aetna Powder Co. et al., 41 Okla. 394 , 138 P. 392 ; Roxana Pet. Co. v. Covington St. Bk., 132 Okla. 221 , 269 P. 1100 .

Westlake v. Cooper

69 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1918

In Board of Trustees of Westminster College v. Piersol, 161 Mo. 271 , 61 S. … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. City of Mangum v. Greer

188 Okla. 504 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1941

*505 This court has not heretofore decided the question thus presented, although in Tulsa County Excise Board v. … What we have said with reference to those acts of the Legislature in Lowden et al. v. Washita County Excise Board, 186 Okla. 708 , 100 P. 2d 459 , and Tulsa County Excise Board v.