Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.57s

  • INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY v. WALTERS

    546 P.3d 875 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 2024

    Board of Education of Independent School District No. 1 of Grady County v. … Maynard Discussed 1952 OK 80, 242 P.2d 427, 206 Okla 261, THE FORTINBERRY CO. v. BLUNDELL Discussed 1955 OK 229, 287 P.2d 704, STATE v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Discussed 2003 OK 30, 66 P.3d 442, GLADSTONE v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor

    87 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1922

    Co. v. Eldredge, 67 Okla. 110 , 169 Pac. 1071 ; Duling. Co. Treas., v. First National Bank of Weleeka, 71 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 554 ; Brown, Co. Treas., v. Hennessey State Rank, 78 Okla. 141 , 189 Pac. 355 . … Co. v.

    Overruled in part by Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise Board, 183 Okla. 295 (1938)Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. McIntosh

    92 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

    In the case of Board of Excise of Oklahoma County v. … (Lamb v. Palmer, 79 Okla. 86 , 191 Pac. 164 ; Wallace v. Excise Board of Bryan County, 91 Okla. 101 , 216 Pac. 654 .) For the reasons stated, we think the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Miller v. Hewitt

    5 Okla. 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1897

    Elsbree v. … To the same effect is Byington v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Owen v. City of Tulsa

    27 Okla. 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1910

    Beaumont v. Bramley, 1 Turner & Russell, 41-50; Marquis of Breadalbane v. *275 Marquis of Chandos, 2 Mylne & Craig, 711; Fowler v. Fowler, 4 De Gex & Jones, 255; Sells v. Sells, 1 Drewry & Snales, 42; Loyd v. … Booke v. Lord Kinsington, 2 Kay & Johnson, 753: Eaton v. Bennett. 34 Ravan. 196. A mistake on one side may be a ground for rescinding, but not for reforming a contract. Mortimer v.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Lowrey v. Hodges

    555 P.2d 1016 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1976

    hearing examiner, citing such cases as Corporation Commission v. … Oklahoma State Personnel *1024 Board, 513 P.2d 116 (Okl.1973), and National Labor Relations Board v. National Paper Company, 216 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1954).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • George v. Adamson

    184 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1939

    We said (citing Roberts v. … “In Roberts v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ruddell v. City of Jenks ex rel. Dashner

    556 P.2d 999 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1976

    Any policeman or police officer who is discharged may appeal to the Board of Review, herein provided. Appeals from decisions of said Board of Review may be taken in the manner provided for in 11 O.S. 1961 , § 541 v. … It was held in City of Tulsa v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jungels v. Town of Hennessey

    202 Okla. 619 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1950

    Our views upon this question are further supported by the decisions of this court in Lowden et al. v. Washita County Excise Board, 188 Okla. 698 , 113 P. 2d 370 ; and School District No. 37, Washita County, et al. v. … Clark v. Lockstone, 170 Okla. 316 , 39 P. 2d 971 . The evidence in the record shows no fraud on the part of the board of trustees.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mayer v. J.T. Jones Sons

    113 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1925

    Newell v. People, 7 N. Y. 97 ; Hills v. Chicago, 60 Ill. 86 ; Denn v. Reid, 35 U. S. 10 Pet. 524 (9:159); Leonard v. Wiseman, 31 Md. 204 ; People v. Potter, 47 N. Y. 375 ; Cooley, Const. … Clerk, v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Darnell

    268 P.2d 860 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1954

    King v. … . * * *» The same general statement was made in the case of Stafford v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 132 , 218 P.2d 617 . As herein above pointed out, the case of Martin v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Bullen

    6 Okla. 757 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1898

    Cunningham, et al. v. Thomas, et al., 50 Pac. Rep. 615 , involving the same question, we are clearly of the opinion that the law was not correctly stated in the case of Gray v. … And under the provisions of our statutes relating to the assessment and valuation of property for revenue purposes, and defining the powers of the several officers and boards, we hold that the territorial board of equalization

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Andrews v. Independent School District No. 29

    737 P.2d 929 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1987

    Haworth Board of Education of Independent School District, I-6, McCurtain County v. Havens, 637 P.2d 902, 904 (Okl.Ct.App.1981). 3 . International Association of Firefighters v. … Thorpe, 632 P.2d 408 , 411 (Okl.1981) and Sanders v. Benton, 579 P.2d 815, 820 (Okl.1978). 4 . Sanders, 579 P.2d at 819 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Martin v. McGarr

    27 Okla. 653 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1910

    Lim. (7th Ed.) p. 933; Howell et al. v. Pate et al. (Ga.) 46 S. E. 667 ; McDowell v. Rutherford Ry. Const. Co. et al. (N. C.) 2 S. E. 351 ; Smith v. Board Co. Com’rs Skagit Co., 45 Fed. 725 ; State ex rel. Harris v. … Gen. v. McDaniel et al., 22 Ohio St. 354 ; Fort Dodge City School Dist. v. Dist. Township of Wahkansa, 17 Iowa, 85 ; People ex rel. Wallace v. Salomon, 46 Ill. 415 ; Newcum v. Kirtley, 52 Ky. 515 ; Marshall v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Wall v. Holder

    279 P.2d 1098 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1955

    In Little v. … Dawson v. Dinwiddie, 186 Okl. 63 , 95 P.2d 867 , Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 147 Okl. 126 , 295 P. 223 , and cases there cited.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Streight v. Durham

    10 Okla. 361 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1900

    In Martin, County Treasurer, v. … In Weyerhaueser v. State of Minnesota, 176 U.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Rupe v. Shaw

    286 P.2d 1094 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1955

    Perry v. Jordan, supra. As held in Adwon v. … In State v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Mehew

    8 Okla. 136 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

    (City of Olympia v. Stevens, [Wash.] 47 Pac. 11 ; Town of Lemont v. Singer & Tolcott Stone Co., 98 Ill. 94 .) … Under the rulings of this court in Bardrick v. Dillon, supra, and Weber v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pitts, Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee

    138 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1928

    Every municipality must submit its budget to) the excise board of their respective counties. City of Sapulpa v. Land, 101 Okla. 22 , 223 Pac. 640 ; Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 101 Okla. 151 , 224 Pac. 969 ; Ryan v. … Roach Drug Co., 113 Okla. 130 , 239 Pac. 913 ; Ryan v. Cook Building & Improvement Co., 113 Okla. 78 , 239 Pac. 919 ; Jones v. Kennedy 118 Okla. 224 , 247 Pac. 53 . Judgment is affirmed. BRANSON, C. J„ MASON, V. O.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Miller

    451 P.2d 932 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1968

    Waters et al., Okl., 348 P.2d 320 ; Cross v. Brown, Okl., 363 P.2d 935 , with exceptions not pertinent here. … Brown & Sons v. Savage, 208 Okl. 668 , 258 P.2d 183 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.