Case law

Hinz v. Hubbard

95 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1923

Burns v. Linn, 49 Okla. 326 , 153 Pac. 826 ), the Legislature has not the power to impose upon a charter city any particular form of city government contrary to the provisions of the city charter. … There is some contention that Walton, Mayor, v. Donnelly et al., 83 Okla. 233 , 201 Pac. 367 , supports the contention of the plaintiff in error. We do not think so.

Watkins v. Grieser

11 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1901

(Black on Intoxicating Liquors, s. 162; Stockwell v. Brand, 97 Ind. 474 ; Hill v. Perry, 82 Ind. 28 ; Groscup v. Rainier, 111 Ind. 361 ; Golden v. Bingham,, 61 Ind. 198 .) … As was said in Swan v.

Sheffield v. Fountain

101 Okla. 168 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

The statutes of Oklahoma do not give the school boards of union graded districts authority to discontinue schools, and such school board can exercise no other powers than those expressly granted by statute or necessarily … Stearns v. Sims, 24 Okla. 623 , 104 Pac. 44 ; McKee v. Adair County Election Board, 36 Okla. 258 , 128 Pac. 294 ; Strother v. Bolen, 72 Oklahoma, 181 Pac. 299 .

Berry v. City of Stillwater

49 Okla. 560 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1915

In Allen v. … A case supporting this conclusion is Board of Trustees of City Schools v. City of Sherman, 91 Tex. 188 , 42 S. W. 546 .

Kale v. Humphrey

67 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1917

At this time they were. living on this land, and had been since the marriage, and, '•owing to his ill health, it was rented to his brother, who farmed it, and the plaintiff boarded him, and he paid the board when he left … Poplin v. Mundell, 27 Kan. 138 ; Lee v. Bermingham, 30 Kan. 312, 316 , 1 Pac. 73 ; Bliss v. Brown, 78 Kan. 467 , 96 Pac. 945 .” In the case of Bliss v.

SHADID v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY

2019 OK 65 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 2019

In Keating v. … OKLAHOMA CITY Discussed 1996 OK 61 , 918 P.2d 51 , 67 OBJ 1680, Keating v. Johnson Discussed 2007 OK 27 , 163 P.3d 512 , FENT v. CONTINGENCY REVIEW BOARD Discussed 2009 OK 15 , 214 P.3d 799 , FENT v. STATE ex rel.

Clarence L. Boyd Co., Inc. v. Blachly

171 Okla. 626 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1935

Bonsteel v. … In Threadgill et al. v.

Weber v. Dillon

7 Okla. 568 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1898

(Fisher v. U. S., 1 Okl. 252 , 31 Pac. 195 ; Kingman v. Pixley, this volume, p. 351, 54 Pac. 494 .) … The question of the power of the territorial board of equalization to equalize the various assessments as re *572 turned by tbe several counties was fully discussed in tbe case of Wallace v.

Gardner v. Scott

205 Okla. 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1951

In Lamb v. … This rule was approved in Wallace v. Excise Board of Bryan County, 91 Okla. 101 , 216 P. 654 .

In Re Earlsboro Gas Co.'s Assessment

165 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1933

These sections of the statute provide an orderlv method of proceedings of the board and the taxpayer whereby a taxpayer feeling himself aggrieved by the action of the board may, during the session of the board, or within … Its appeal herein to review the action of the State Board of Equalization is, therefore, dismissed. RILEY, O. J., OULLISON. V. C. X, and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JJ., concur. BAY-LESS, X, absent.

Waugh v. Dibbens

61 Okla. 221 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1916

judicial power of the state is vested in the Senate, sitting as a court of impeachment, a Supreme Court, district courts, county courts, courts of justices of the peace, municipal courts, and sueh other courts, commissions, or boards … In the case of Campbell v. Brown et al., 2 Woods, 349 , Fed. Cas.

First Nat. Bank of Norman v. Briggs

104 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1924

be the sole remedies for the correction of assessment or equaliation.” , Our attention is also called to the case of Board of Com’rs of Garfield County, v. … In the case of Board of Com’rs v. Canadian County et al. v. Tinklepaugh et al., 49 Okla. 440 152 Pac. 1119 , the court, in passing upon the .effect of section 7370, Rev. Laws 1910, being section 9686, Comp.

Baker v. Carter

165 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1933

University of Utah v. Candland et al., Members of the State Board of Land Commissioners, 104 P. 285 . … “We see no merit in the contention that the board of regents have no power under the act to issue bonds. Hall v. Hood River Irrigation District, 57 Ore. 69 , 116 P. 405 .”

Leeper v. State Ex Rel. Waters

171 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1935

National Surety Co. v. State, for Use and Benefit of Board of Commissioners of Comanche County, et al., 111 Okla. 180 , 239 P. 257 ; National Surety Co. v. State ex rel. … Laws 1910), is vested in the board of county commissioners. * * *” *237 And in the case of Board of Commissioners of Atoka County v.

Sanders v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

430 P.2d 789 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1967

In State v. … Tharp v. Unemployment Compensation Commission, 57 Wyo. 486 , 121 P.2d 172 ; State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Brown, 255 Or. 306 , 358 P.2d 502 ; Byrd v.

Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC v. Adams

279 P.3d 788 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 2012

Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, 15 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . See also Kluver v. Weatherford Hosp. … Id.; Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Ins. Co., 1989 OK 107 , 777 P.2d 932 , 936 n. 15. . State ex rel. Fent v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 2003 OK 29, 114 , 66 P.3d 432, 440 . Spirgis v.

Court Fund of Tulsa County v. Cook

557 P.2d 875 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1976

Watchorn Basin Assn. v. Oklahoma Gas and Elec. … It was held in Board of Commissioners of McIntosh County v.

Norton v. Moore

261 P.2d 196 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1953

Brown, an attorney in Duncan, Oklahoma. The said R. H. … Brown and his secretary, Ruth Faris, testified on behalf of the plaintiffs that the said deed was the same in form and content as alleged by plaintiffs; that the deed had been delivered to Mr. Brown by A. S.

El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor

87 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1922

Co. v. Eldredge, 67 Okla. 110 , 169 Pac. 1071 ; Duling. Co. Treas., v. First National Bank of Weleeka, 71 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 554 ; Brown, Co. Treas., v. Hennessey State Rank, 78 Okla. 141 , 189 Pac. 355 . … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Love v. Smith

43 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1914

In Kerr v. … Hart v. Harvey, 32 Barb. (N. Y.) 55.