Case law

Callahan v. Callahan

47 Okla. 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1915

Denny v. Wright et al., 13 Okla. 256 , 74 Pac. 104 ; Wade et al. v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168 , 79 Pac. 95 ; Williamson v. William *544 son, 15 Okla. 680 , 83 Pac. 718 ; Messmore et al. v. … Reed v. Wolcott, 40 Okla. 451 , 139 Pac. 318 ; Memphis Steel Construction Co. v. Hutchison, ante, 147 Pac. 771 .

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Hall

567 P.2d 975 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1977

Bar Association v. Scanland, Okl., 475 P.2d 373 . … United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313 . In State ex rel. Okl. Bar Ass’n v. Scan-land, Okl., 475 P.2d 373 , we characterized a District Attorney, or assistant, as a minister of justice second only to judges.

Buchanan v. Fant

110 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1925

Brown, John A. Haste, and P. W. … In Eastwood et al. v.

Sims v. St. Anthony Hospital

180 Okla. 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1937

Hardy Sanitarium v. DeHart, 164 Okla. 29 , 22 P. (2d) 379 : Stayman v. McKellop. 165 Okla. 183 , 25 P. (2d) 701 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 : Rose Hill Burial Park v. … In Stayman v. McKellop and Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v.

Oklahoma Tire & Supply Company v. Summerlin

290 P.2d 403 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1955

Mobley v. Brown, 151 Okl. 167 , 2 P.2d 1034 , 83 A.L.R. 1014 ; Veazey Drug Co. v. Bruza, 169 Okl. 418 , 37 P.2d 294 ; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. … McHan, 162 Okl. 8 , 18 P.2d 875 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okl. 283 , 20 P.2d 141 ; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Baker, Okl., 286 P.2d 272 .

State Ex Rel. Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

189 Okla. 629 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1941

In Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. … Under the general rule stated in 59 Corpus Juris, supra, and the rule announced in Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v.

Bretz v. El Reno State Bank

71 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1918

Barton v. Saunders, 16 Ore. 51 , 16 Pac. 921 , 8 Am. St. Rep. 261 : State v. Norton, 69 S. C. 454, 48 S. E. 464 . The tax levied against these bonds is illegal because not authorized by law. … Roma Oil Co. v. Long, 68 Okla. 267 , 173 Pac. 957 , and authorities there ciled. The defendant in error paid the entire amount of the tax levied against it, and, proceeding under section 7, subd.

Shelton v. State Ex Rel. Caldwell, Co.

62 Okla. 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 2, 1917

Board of Commissioners of Grant Co. v Ernest, 45 Okla. 725 , 147 Pac. 322 ; Anderson v. Board of Commissioners, Grant County, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 : Russell v. … Board of Com’rs of Grant County, 44 Okla. 301 , 144 Pac. 580 ; Huntington v Board of Com’rs of Grant County, 44 Okla. 276 , 144 Pac. 385 ; Orendorff v.

Britton v. Morris

59 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

In the case of Arthur v. … Also, in White et al. v.

Berg v. Willibey

138 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1929

Mott v. Hull. 51 Okla. 602 , 352 Pac. 92 ; Strong v. Day, 61 Okla. 166 , 160 Pac. 722 . … In McKenna v.

Bonnett v. State Ex Rel. Newer

47 Okla. 503 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1915

Zeigler, County Clerk, 26 Okla. 826 , 110 Pac. 1052 ; Parker et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 981 . In Reynolds et al. v. … In support of this section of the syllabus the court cites Stookey v. Board, 6 Idaho, 542 , 57 Pac. 312 .

Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.

13 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

Board of Winona Co., 23 Minn. 404 ; Missouri: Hooper v. Ely, 46 Mo. 505 ; Wagner v. Mesty et al., 69 Mo. 150 ; New Hampshire: Merrill v. Plainfield, 45 N. H. 126; New Mexico: Laughlin v. … Board Santa Fe Co., 5 Pac. 817 ; Nebraska: Whitcomb v. Board of Saline Co., 24 Neb. 50 ; Ackerman v. Thummel, 40 Neb. 95 ; Tukey v. City of Omaha, 74 N. W. 613 ; Oregon: Brownfield v.

Cherokee County Pub. Co. v. Cherokee County

48 Okla. 722 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1915

(Beaty v. State ex rel. Lee, 35 Okla. 682 , 130 Pac. 958 , citing Rakowski v. Wagoner, 24 Okla. 282 , 103 Pac. 632; Trapp v. Wells Fargo Exp. Co., 22 Okla. 377 , 97 Pac. 1003 ; Winslow v. … (Board of County *734 Com’rs of Beaver County v. Beaver County ex rel. Spohn, 45 Okla. 526 , 146 Pac. 434 .)

McCoy v. Bd. of Cty. Commr. of the Cty of Rogers

285 P.2d 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1955

On October 12, 19S3, Shirley McCoy hrought an action in mandamus in the District Court of Rogers county to require the ■County Commissioners and Excise Board members of Rogers county to transfer from the general funds of … See Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 147 Okl. 126, 295 . P. 223, and cases cited therein. Appeal dismissed. JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, ARNOLD, HALLEY and BLACKBIRD, JJ. concur.

Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Anderson

28 Okla. 650 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

City Co. v. Smith Bridge Co., 151 U. S. 294 , 14 Sup. Ct. 339, 38 L. … Co. v. Union Steamboat Co., 107 U. S. 98 , 2 Sup. Ct. 221, 27 L.

Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

139 P.3d 873 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 2006

Board of Adjustment of the City of Tulsa, supra ; White v. Wint, 1981 OK 154 , 638 P.2d 1109, 1114 . … Co. v. Brown, 1974 OK 19, ¶ 21 , 519 P.2d 491, 495 . [31] Eskridge v.

Lovett, Creek County Com'rs v. Lankford

47 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1914

shall be chairman of said board. … Brashear v. Mason, 6 How. 92 [ 12 L. Ed. 357 ] ; United States ex rel. Goodrich v. Guthrie, 17 How. 285 [ 15 L. Ed. 102 ]; Commissioner of Patents v. Whiteley, 4 Wall. *23 522 [ 18 L. Ed. 385 ]; Georgia v.

School Dist. No. 4 v. Independent School Dist. No. 4½

153 Okla. 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1931

Thompson v. Rearick, 83 Okla. 283 , 124 P. 951 . That provision of the Constitution is a limitation and not a grant of power. Thompson v. Rearick, supra. … “This section was construed in the case of Tilley v.

State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Vaughn

33 Okla. 384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1912

W. v. S. F., 52 Cal. 111 .) … parties. *389 In Montgomery v.

Olmstead v. Reedy

387 P.2d 631 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1963

Reedy filed with the Board. This is especially true since plaintiffs pleaded damage to alfalfa and truck patch. In the case of City of Tulsa v. … See Swisher v. Clark, 202 Okl. 25 , 209 P.2d 880 , and Hart v. Starnes Lbr. Co., Okl., 290 P.2d 123 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. BLACKBIRD, C. J., HALLEY, V. C.