Case law

Van Meter v. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co.

170 Okla. 604 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1935

Board of Appeal, 257 Mass. 446 , 154 N. E. 82 : Bradley v. Board, 255 Mass. 160 and 177, 150 N. E. 892 ; Prusik v. Board of Appeal of Bldg. Dept. of Boston, 262 Mass. 451 , 160 N. E. 312 ; People ex rel. Smith v. … Board of Appeals, 115 Misc. 449 , 189 N. Y. S. 772; Norcross et al. v. Board of Appeals, 255 Mass. 177 , 150 N. E. 887 .

Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.

13 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

Board of Winona Co., 23 Minn. 404 ; Missouri: Hooper v. Ely, 46 Mo. 505 ; Wagner v. Mesty et al., 69 Mo. 150 ; New Hampshire: Merrill v. Plainfield, 45 N. H. 126; New Mexico: Laughlin v. … Board Santa Fe Co., 5 Pac. 817 ; Nebraska: Whitcomb v. Board of Saline Co., 24 Neb. 50 ; Ackerman v. Thummel, 40 Neb. 95 ; Tukey v. City of Omaha, 74 N. W. 613 ; Oregon: Brownfield v.

City of Oklahoma City v. Harris

191 Okla. 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1941

Reinhart & Donovan Co. et al. v. Refiners’ Production Co. et al., 175 Okla. 522 , 53 P. 2d 1116 . If the facts presented warrant the conclusion reached by the board of adjustment, then the matter should be affirmed. … CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. OSBORN, BAYLESS, and GIBSON, JJ., dissent. WELCH, C. J., not participating.

St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Tulsa County

171 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . … See Board of County Commissioners v. King, 147 Okla. 34 , 294 P. 101 ; Board of Education v. Thurman, 121 Okla. 108 , 247 P. 996 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 P. 565 .

Schaff v. Daugherty

112 Okla. 124 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1925

Co. v. Dobyns, 57 Okla. 643 . 157 Pac. 735 , and Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Brown, 45 Okla. 476 , 146 Pac. 6 . … Co. v. Brown, 241 U. S. 224 , 60 L. Ed. 966 , 36 S. Ct. 602 ; Southern Railway Co. v. Hill (Ga.) 77 S. E. 803 ; Dickenson v. Granberry, 71 Okla. 9 , 174 Pac. 776 ; Central Railroad Co. v. Skaggs, 240 U.

IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION OF HARLIN FOR ADMISSION BY EXAMINATION

393 P.3d 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2017

Ellington v. Horwitz Enterprises , 2003 OK 37, 68 P.3d 983. This Court approves court rules and forms only as a matter of procedure. … See, e.g. , Cornett v. Carr , 2013 OK 30, ¶ 13, 302 P.3d 769, 773 (concluding that Rule 9(a) of the Rules of the District Courts directly conflicted with 12 O.S.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Heinen

60 P.3d 1018 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 2002

See also, Skelton v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 56 S.W.3d 687 , 693—694 (Tex.App.—Houston, [14th Dist.] 2001), (citing Rule 3.09); Brown v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 980 S.W.2d 675, 683 (Tex.App. … —San Antonio, 1998, no pet.), (stating principle and citing Rule 3.09). .Board of Law Examiners of State of Tex. v. Gabriel, 953 S.W.2d 227, 228 (Tex.1997).

Garner v. Johnson

609 P.2d 760 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1980

In the case of Melody Miller v. … Perry v. Green, 468 P.2d 483 (Okl.1970).

Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Anderson

28 Okla. 650 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

City Co. v. Smith Bridge Co., 151 U. S. 294 , 14 Sup. Ct. 339, 38 L. … Co. v. Union Steamboat Co., 107 U. S. 98 , 2 Sup. Ct. 221, 27 L.

Nelson v. Oklahoma City & W. Ry. Co.

24 Okla. 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1909

(Hewes v. Reis et al., 40 Cal. 255 .) … (Best v. Gholson, 89 Ill. 465 .) Nor does the rule laid down in the case of Sweet et al. v. Boyd et al., 6 Okla. 700 , 52 Pac. 939 , cited by counsel for defendant, help his cause.

Glen L. Wigton Motor Co. v. Phillips

163 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1933

Brown also testified as follows: “Q. … Co. v.

WITHDRAWAL AND REPLACEMENT OF RULE 12 OF THE RULES OF STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS

2017 OK 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 2017

Interpreters in Oklahoma; and 5) Prove that he or she holds at least one of the following sign language interpreting credentials from the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID): SC:L, NIC, NIC-A, NIC-M, CI, CT, NAD V, … The renewal process shall be prescribed by the Board, and the Board shall provide a renewal form through the office of the Administrative Director of the Courts.

Schwarze v. Clark

188 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1940

This section was upheld as constitutional in Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okla. 392 , 82 P. 2d 977 ; see, also, Jarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners et al., 183 Okla. *219 527, 83 P. 2d 560 ; Vandervort v. … It was held by this court in Nation v.

Acme Flour Mills v. Bray

185 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1939

Brown. … Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 113 Okla. 179 , 241 P. 170 ; Shepard v. Crumby, 146 Okla. 118 , 293 P. 1049 ; Magnolia Pet. Co. v. Clow, 163 Okla. 302 , 22 P.2d 378 .

Gentis v. Hunt

121 Okla. 71 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1925

This rute has been announced by this court in the following cases: Buxton & Skinner Stationery Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Craig County, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 Pac. 215 ; State Bank of Miami v. … Co. v.

Rucker v. Mason

61 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1916

Brown, the defendant B. 0. … Brown and B. C.

Whitaker v. State Ex Rel. Pierce

58 Okla. 672 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1916

Roberts et al. v. … Board v. Dill, 26 Okla. 104 , 110 Pac. 1107 , 29 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1170, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 101.

Dewey v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System

72 O.B.A.J. 1488 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 2001

K & K Food Services, Inc. v. S & H, Inc., 2000 OK 31, ¶ 7 , 3 P.3d 705 ; Keith v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 1954 OK. 196, 272 P.2d 371 syl. 2. . Rivas v. … City of Cherokee v. Tatro, 1981 OK 127 , 636 P.2d 337, 339 ; Fitts v. Standard Life and Acc. Ins. Co., 1974 OK 60 , 522 P.2d 1040 . "Equity will not require the doing of a useless act." Parker v.

Boydston v. State

277 P.2d 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1954

or specific definition thereof by the Board. … JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, DA-VISON, ARNOLD, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. HALLEY, C. J., dissents.

Callahan v. Callahan

47 Okla. 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1915

Denny v. Wright et al., 13 Okla. 256 , 74 Pac. 104 ; Wade et al. v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168 , 79 Pac. 95 ; Williamson v. William *544 son, 15 Okla. 680 , 83 Pac. 718 ; Messmore et al. v. … Reed v. Wolcott, 40 Okla. 451 , 139 Pac. 318 ; Memphis Steel Construction Co. v. Hutchison, ante, 147 Pac. 771 .