Case law

Babb v. Independent School District No. I-5 of Rogers County

63 O.B.A.J. 1054 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1992

See Pickens County Board of Education v. Keasler, 263 Ala. 231 , 82 So.2d 197, 199 (1955); Board of School Trustees v. O'Brien, 190 A.2d 23 (Del.1963); Hankenson v. … Board of School Trustees v. O’Brien, supra note 11 at 27; Watson v.

Lowden v. Excise Bd. of Pottawatomie County

176 Okla. 646 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1936

In Delaware County Excise Board v. St. L.-S. F. Ry. … In the cited case and in Gallion v.

Rourke v. Gerlach-Barklow Co.

104 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1915

Henderson v. Todd, 91 Okla. 18 , 215 Pac. 607 ; Hooker v. Rackley, 90 Okla. 83 , 216 Pac. 151 . The plaintiff in error executed a super-sedeas bond in this case in the sum of $500, with S. A. … Brown as surety, which bond was dulyi approved as shown by a certified copy thereof attached to the case-made. *240 The defendant in error has filed a motion herein for judgment against the surety on said supersedeas bond

Garner v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'n

131 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1928

E. 356 ; Latta v. Catawba Elec. Co., 146 N. C. 285 , 59 S. E. 1028 .) “A board of county commissioners can, on the first Monday of September, Labor Day, legally consider and act on a petition for a public road.” … (Citing Stewart v. Brown, 112 Mo. 171 .) 29 C. J. p. 767, par. 11, says: “As in the case of other transactions, the validity vel non of official acts performed on a legal holiday depends on the terms of the statute.

Weatherly, Co. Treas. v. Sawyer

63 Okla. 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1917

Co. v. City of Perry, 8 Okla. 429 , 58 Pac. 635 ; Jones v. Carnes, 17 Okla. 470 , 87 Pac. 652 ; Whitaker v. Crowder State Bank, 26 Okla. 786 , 110 Pac. 776 . … Williams, County Clerk, v. Garfield Exchange Bank, 38 Okla. 539 , 134 Pac. 863 ; Carrico et al. v. Crocker et al., 38 Okla. 440 , 133 Pac. 181 ; Thompson et al. v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State

23 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1909

Along this loading or .house track were located the elevator of the Ghickasha Milling Company, coalhouses, stockyards, Stephenson-Brown Lumber Company, and some other structures. … R. v. Jacobson, 179 U. S. 287 , 21 Sup. Ct. 115, 45 L. Ed. 194 , and Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 U. S. 427 , 17 Sup. Ct. 627, 41 L.

City of Bethany v. Hill

509 P.2d 1364 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 1973

Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Okl., 422 P.2d 840 . … The minutes of the Board patently are not the written ruling of the Board as required by § 2-21 of the City Ordinance.

Molacek v. White

31 Okla. 693 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1912

Howell County v. Justices of Howell County Court, 58 Mo. 583 ; Colburn v. Board of Com’rs of El Paso County et al., 15 Colo. App. 90 , 61 Pac. 241 ; Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 141 N. C. 60 , 53 S. E. 652 , 4 L. R. A. … The case of Ardrey et al. v.

Enid Bank & Trust Co. v. Yandell

176 Okla. 550 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1936

Bank v. Townsend, supra, 74, 75; Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341, 350 . … See Bank of United States v. Owens, 2 Pet. 527, 537 ; Brown v. Tarkington, 3 Wall, 377, 381; Thomas v. City of Richmond, 12 Wall. 349, 356 ; Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Voight & Sons Co., 212 U.

Ball v. Harnischfeger Corp.

65 O.B.A.J. 2050 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1994

In Wayne Township Board of Educ. v. … Arkansas, Brown v.

Miller v. Burkett

191 Okla. 521 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1942

Milliken, 57 Okla. 735 , 157 P. 914 ; Kelly v. Brown, 55 Okla. 628 , 155 P. 590 ; Bank of Buffalo v. Venn, 68 Okla. 43 , 171 P. 450 ; National Credit Co. v. Franklin, 177 Okla. 417 , 60 P. 2d 744 ; Wilkes v. … Kelly v. Brown, supra; Sherwood v. Wise, 132 Wash. 295 , 232 P. 309 , 42 A. L. R. 1219; Maynard v. Maynard, 251 Ky. 246 , 64 S. W. 2d 567 , 91 A. L. R. 697; 7 C. J. Supp. p. 1080.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLARK

2023 OK 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2023

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Bar Ass'n v.

Village Bank v. Seikel

503 P.2d 550 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1972

Co. v. … And in Polk v.

Clapp v. Miller

89 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1923

Bank v. Mee, 39 Okla. 775 , 136 Pac. 758 . … Chickasaw Compress Co. v. Bow, 47 Okla. 576 , 149 Pac. 1166 ; Chicago, (R. I. & P. Ry. Co., v. Johnson, 71 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 494 ; Slick Oil Co. v.

Kelso v. Sheppard

105 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1924

In the case of Welch v. … In the case of Littlehead v.

Pushmataha County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

354 P.2d 404 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1960

Lowden v. Jefferson County Excise Board, 190 Okl. 276 , 122 P.2d 991 . In the year 1941 this court decided Oklahoma County Excise Board v. … Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board, 170 Okl. 573 , 41 P.2d 473 .

Tulsa Tribune Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission

768 P.2d 891 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1989

See Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan Auth., Okl., 626 P.2d 314, 315 [1981]; Brown Investment Co. v. Hickox, Okl., 369 P.2d 807, 808 [1962]; Carlton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. … Brown Investment Co. v. Hickox, supra note 1 at 808; and Carlton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., supra note 1 at 289-290. . Westinghouse Elec. v.

Nipper v. Excise Bd. of Osage County

170 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1934

I find no conflict between the cases of Hall v. Turner et al., 125 Okla. 248 , 257 P. 328 , and City of Shidler v. Speer & Sons Co. et al., 62 F. (2d) 544.

Morningside Hospital & Training School for Nurses v. Carmichael

185 Okla. 48 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1938

, citing City of Enid v. … See, also, State v. State ex rel. Shull, 142 Okla. 293 , 286 P. 891 , wherein the methods for redress to the property owner are discussed. See, also, Ivester v. State ex rel.

Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. Pittman

322 P.2d 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1957

Reigel v. Harrison, 6 Cir., 157 F.2d 140 ; Walsh v. International Alliance, etc., 37 A.2d 667 , 22 N.J.Misc. 161. … Ames v. Dubinsky, Sup., 70 N.Y.S.2d. 706. It is also suggested that the Trial Board' was prejudiced and was committed to a finding of guilty prior to the trial.