Case law

Williams v. Hewitt

74 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1919

Lynn v. Brown, 38 Okla. 209 , 132 Pac. 810 . … To the same effect is the holding by this court in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Noble County v. Whitney. 73 Okla. 160 , 175 Pac. 112 .

Morningside Hospital & Training School for Nurses v. Carmichael

185 Okla. 48 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1938

, citing City of Enid v. … See, also, State v. State ex rel. Shull, 142 Okla. 293 , 286 P. 891 , wherein the methods for redress to the property owner are discussed. See, also, Ivester v. State ex rel.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State

23 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1909

Along this loading or .house track were located the elevator of the Ghickasha Milling Company, coalhouses, stockyards, Stephenson-Brown Lumber Company, and some other structures. … R. v. Jacobson, 179 U. S. 287 , 21 Sup. Ct. 115, 45 L. Ed. 194 , and Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 U. S. 427 , 17 Sup. Ct. 627, 41 L.

VANDELAY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. FALLIN

2014 OK 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 2014

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, § 22 n.30, 989 P.2d 448, 455 n.30 (citations omitted). … OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Discussed 1999 OK 79, 989 P.2d 448, 70 OBJ 2752, Manley v. Brown Discussed Title 12.

Ball v. Harnischfeger Corp.

65 O.B.A.J. 2050 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1994

In Wayne Township Board of Educ. v. … Arkansas, Brown v.

TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND v. STITT

2026 OK 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 2026

Bd. of Regents v. McCloskey Bros, Inc. , 2009 OK 90 227 P.3d 133 Lujan , 504 U.S. at 562 . ¶14 Plaintiff TSET is made up of the seven-member Board. … . # 52 of Oklahoma Cnty. v. Hofmeister , 2020 OK 56 473 P.3d 475 may change the composition of the TSET board of directors. The text of Okla. Const. art.

Ryan v. Humphries

50 Okla. 343 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1915

This seems to be, in substance, the doctrine laid down in Hill v. City of Indianapolis (C. C.), 92 Fed. 467 ; Daviess County v. Dickinson, 117 U. S. 657 , 6 Sup. Ct. 897, 29 L. Ed. 1026 ; Town of Bloomfield v. … In the first paragraph of the syllabus in Hill v.

Rourke v. Gerlach-Barklow Co.

104 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1915

Henderson v. Todd, 91 Okla. 18 , 215 Pac. 607 ; Hooker v. Rackley, 90 Okla. 83 , 216 Pac. 151 . The plaintiff in error executed a super-sedeas bond in this case in the sum of $500, with S. A. … Brown as surety, which bond was dulyi approved as shown by a certified copy thereof attached to the case-made. *240 The defendant in error has filed a motion herein for judgment against the surety on said supersedeas bond

REV. DR. MITCH RANDALL v. LINDEL FIELDS

2025 OK 91 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 2025

Dutton v. … Head v.

Echols v. Reeburgh

62 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1916

Board of Com’rs of Woodward Co. v. Thyfault, 43 Okla. 82 , 141 Pac. 409 . … Condit v. Condit, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 456 ; Bolling v. Campbell, 36 Okla. 671 , 128 Pac. 1091 ; Scott v. Brown, 40 Okla. 184 , 137 Pac. 113 .

Tulsa Tribune Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission

768 P.2d 891 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1989

See Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan Auth., Okl., 626 P.2d 314, 315 [1981]; Brown Investment Co. v. Hickox, Okl., 369 P.2d 807, 808 [1962]; Carlton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. … Brown Investment Co. v. Hickox, supra note 1 at 808; and Carlton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., supra note 1 at 289-290. . Westinghouse Elec. v.

Minie v. Hudson

68 O.B.A.J. 909 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1997

Henry v. Ionic Petroleum Co., 391 P.2d 792, 794 (Okla.1964); Board of County Com’rs v. … Board of County Com’rs, 442 P.2d 297, 302 (Okla.1968). 28 . Tide 51 O.S.Supp.1992 § 156(D), see note 1, supra. 29 . Krokowski v. Henderson Nat'l Corp., 917 P.2d 8, 11 (Okla.1996); Grover v.

Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. Pittman

322 P.2d 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1957

Reigel v. Harrison, 6 Cir., 157 F.2d 140 ; Walsh v. International Alliance, etc., 37 A.2d 667 , 22 N.J.Misc. 161. … Ames v. Dubinsky, Sup., 70 N.Y.S.2d. 706. It is also suggested that the Trial Board' was prejudiced and was committed to a finding of guilty prior to the trial.

Parkinson, Co. Treas. v. State Ex Rel. Thieman

196 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1943

Tharel et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Creek County et al., 188 Okla. 184 , 107 P. 2d 542 . F. P. … In City of Enid v.

Pushmataha County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

354 P.2d 404 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1960

Lowden v. Jefferson County Excise Board, 190 Okl. 276 , 122 P.2d 991 . In the year 1941 this court decided Oklahoma County Excise Board v. … Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board, 170 Okl. 573 , 41 P.2d 473 .

Rogers v. Bass & Harbour Co.

64 Okla. 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1917

The principle announced in Thurston v. Caldwell was adhered to in Thurston v. Frank et al., 40 Okla. 463 , 139 Pac. 124 , and in Thurston v. … Co. v. Amend, 44 Okla. 602 , 145 Pac. 1117 , and in St. L. & S. F. R. R. Co. v.

Castro v. Keyes

63 O.B.A.J. 1920 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1992

Taggart v. … They cite Baldwin v.

Simmons v. Stuckey

113 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1925

Ree., v. Borum, Co. … In . the case" of the Board of Education of Guthrie v.

Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.

157 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1932

The protestant herein contends to the contrary and in support of its contention it cites the decisions of this court in Board of County Commissioners v. Gillett, 9 Okla. 593 , 60 Pac. 277 ; Campbell v. State ex rel. … City of Guthrie v. Excise Board of Logan County, 86 Okla. 24 , 206 Pac. 517 .

Village Bank v. Seikel

503 P.2d 550 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1972

Co. v. … And in Polk v.