Case law

Gamel v. Hynds

34 Okla. 388 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1912

(Mass.) 381; Nicolay v. Fritschle, 40 Mo. 67 ; Cocker v. Cocker, 2 Mo. App. 451; Brown v. Clark, 14 Pa. 469 ; Wells v. Schoonover, 9 Heisk. (Tenn.) 805; Hutchings v. Rienhalter, 23 R. I. 518, 51 Atl. 429 , 58 L. R. … A. 680; Brown v. Chenoworth, 51 Tex. 469 ; Geisreiter v. Sevier, 33 Ark. 522 ; Booker v. Robbins, 26 Ark. 660 . In Calwell v.

Searcy v. State Ex Rel. Carl

64 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 8, 1917

Leader Printing Co. v. Territory, 6 Okla. 302 , 50 Pac. 1001 ; Allen et al. v. Reed et al., 10 Okla. 105 , 60 Pac. 782 , 63 Pac. 867 ; Brewer et al. v. Rust, 20 Okla. 776 , 95 Pac. 233 . But, as said in Jefferson v. … Bailey, 13 Allen (Mass.) 541; Ham v. Boston Board of Police, 142, Mass. 90, 7 N. E. 540 .

MAREE v. NEUWIRTH

2016 OK 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 2016

BROWN Discussed 2004 OK 16 , 87 P.3d 598 , CHANDLER (U.S.A.), INC. v. TYREE Discussed 2015 OK 24 , 348 P.3d 1080 , BABY F. v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Discussed at Length 1980 OK 84 , 612 P.2d 257 , State ex rel. … Smith v. Banking Bd. Discussed Title 12.

PURCELL v. PARKER

475 P.3d 834 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 2020

OSCN Found Document:PURCELL v. PARKER PURCELL v. … Carlile Trust v.

Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. Carter

66 O.B.A.J. 2223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1995

Oklahoma courts recently have applied Edmondson in holding dismissal of appeal from decisions of the Board of Review required for failure to name all necessary parties. In Taylor v. Okla. … See also, District Court for the Seventeenth Judicial District v. Board of Review, 849 P.2d 1102 (Okla.App.1993).

Goodall v. City of Clinton

196 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1945

HURST, V. C. J. … State Election Board, 121 Okla. 119 , 248 P. 642 ; American Druggists Fire Ins. Co. v. State Insurance Board, 184 Okla. 66 , 84 P. 2d 614 .

St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Thompson

35 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1912

Wiggins et al. v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 9 Okla. 118 , 59 Pac. 248 , and A., T. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. … Wiggins et al. v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co., supra; A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Wiggins, supra; Collins et al. v. Green et al., 10 Okla. 244 , 62 Pac. 813 ; Russell v. Green et al., 10 Okla. 340 , 62 Pac. 817 .

Panhandle Cooperative Royalty Company v. McLain

355 P.2d 1047 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1960

Misc. 177 , 171 A. 171 ; Excise Board of Tulsa Co. v. City of Tulsa, 180 Okl. 248 , 68 P.2d 823 ; 13 Am. Jur. Sec. 446, p. 493; Guthrie v. Harkness, 199 U.S. 148 , 26 S.Ct. 4 , 50 L.Ed. 130 ; Bruning v. … Verman v. Scott, 12 N.J. Misc. 177 , 171 A. 171 , supra. Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of Tulsa, 180 Okl. 248 , supra. 18 C.J.S. Corporations § 510, p. 1187.

Clark v. Warner

85 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1922

In Lawry v. Board of Com’rs of Snohomish Co. et al. … Board of County Commissioners of Payne County, 33 Okla. 353 , 125 Pac. 449 ; Black v. Geissler, 58 Okla. 335 , 159 Pac. 1124 , and Bodine v. McDaniel Auto Co., supra.

School Dist. No. 85 v. School Dist. No. 71

135 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1928

For the reason heretofore recited, this case is not comparable to Smartt v. Board of Com’rs of Craig County, 67 Okla. 144 , 169 Pac. 1161 . … In Levine v.

State Ex Rel. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Boyett

183 Okla. 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1938

Stubbs v. Excise Board of Muskogee County is also not in point. … S. 1931, and Wenner v. Board of Education (1910) 25 Okla. 515 , 106 P. 821 .

TREAT v. STITT

481 P.3d 240 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 2021

, Board of Public Affairs, Board of Chiropody, Board of Pharmacy, Election Board, Board of Education, Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, Board of Regents of Oklahoma College for Women, Board of Regents of Northeastern … Johnson Discussed 2007 OK 27 , 163 P.3d 512 , FENT v. CONTINGENCY REVIEW BOARD Discussed 2009 OK 6 , 212 P.3d 447 , COSSEY v. CHEROKEE NATION ENTERPRISES, LLC Discussed at Length 2009 OK 51 , 230 P.3d 488 , GRIFFITH v.

Summey v. Tisdale

658 P.2d 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1982

Our decision in Neel v. Board of County Commissioners of Cherokee County, Okl., 617 P.2d 201 [1980] is not applicable here. The controversy in Neel centered around a budget request for the 1977-1978 fiscal year. … Nixon v. Roberts, Okl., 420 P.2d 898, 903 [1966], 27 .Board of County Commissioners of Nowata County v. Price, Okl., 385 P.2d 479, 482 [1963]; Nixon v. Roberts, supra note 26.

WOOD v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF OKLAHOMA CITY

336 P.3d 457 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 2014

Brown v. … First, quoting Brown v.

Martin v. Harrah Independent School District

543 P.2d 1370 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1975

Sanders v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, 200 Okl. 366 , 195 P.2d 272 (1948); Speaker v. Board of County Com’rs of Oklahoma County, Okl., 312 P. 2d 438 (1957). … McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Damico v. California, 389 U.S. 416 , 88 S. Ct. 526 , 19 L.Ed.2d 647 (1967); Bowles v. Robbins, 359 F.Supp. 249, 256 (D.Vt.1973).

Appeal of National Bank of Tulsa

312 P.2d 495 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1957

Co. v. … Thereunder, the same presumption of correctness was accorded the deci *500 sion of the board, McBirney v.

BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA CTY. v. Horne

288 P.2d 406 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1955

Gooldy v. Lawson, 155 Okl. 259 , 9 P.2d 22 ; Lee Way Stage Lines v. Simmons, 166 Okl. 203 , 26 P.2d 905 . … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

Chickasha Inv. Co. v. Phillips

58 Okla. 760 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1916

it be presented to the board. . … Lane v. C., O. & G. Ry. Co., 19 Okla. 324 , 91 Pac. 883 ; Taylor v. Ins. Co. of North America, 25 Okla. 92 , 105 Pac. 354 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 906 ; Midland Sav. & L. Co. v. Sutton, 30 Okla. 448 , 120 Pac. 1007 ; Adams v.

Lee v. Cameron

67 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1917

Carney, who were the sole and only stockholders on the date of the organization, and who composed the board of directors. … Stein v. Howard, 65 Cal. 616 , 4 Pac. 662 ; Mathis v. Pridham, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 58 , 20 S. W. 1015 ; Brown v. Duluth, etc., Ry. Co. (C. C.) 53 Fed. 889 ; Continental Trust Co. v. Toledo, etc., Ry. Co. (C.

Prince Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.

110 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1925

Emeric v. Alvarado (Cal.) 2 Pac. 418 . "A tax cannot bo mp sed i.vithont fix'nv the rate.” State v. Board of Examiners (Mont.) 104 Pac. 1055 . … Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. West, Atty.