Case law

Tulsa City Lines, Inc. v. Johnston

204 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1951

Co. v. … Co. v.

Rogers v. Lassiter, Adm'r.

196 Okla. 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1945

Fairly illustrative of this line of authorities are the cases of Brown v. Durham, 175 Okla. 500 , 53 P. 2d 551 , and Crawford, County Treasurer, et al. v. McConnell et al., 173 Okla. 520 , 49 P. 2d 551 . … into with Brown.

Lee v. Cameron

67 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1917

Carney, who were the sole and only stockholders on the date of the organization, and who composed the board of directors. … Stein v. Howard, 65 Cal. 616 , 4 Pac. 662 ; Mathis v. Pridham, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 58 , 20 S. W. 1015 ; Brown v. Duluth, etc., Ry. Co. (C. C.) 53 Fed. 889 ; Continental Trust Co. v. Toledo, etc., Ry. Co. (C.

Texas Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Christy

155 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

Lobert & Klein v. Whitten, 150 Okla. 72 , 300 P. 636 . The testimony shows that claimant paid Dr. Brown for his treatment the sum oi $10. … Walker Motor Co. v. Eastman, 150 Okla. 227 , 1 P. (2d) 640 . Allen v. Elk City Cotton Oil Co., 125 Okla. 142 , 256 P. 898 . In Walker Motor Co. v.

Stearns v. State Ex Rel. Biggers

23 Okla. 462 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1909

Blodgett v. Board of Canvassers (Sup.) 19 N. Y. … Coll v. Board, 83 Mich. 367 , 47 N. W. 227 Roemer v. Board, 90 Mich. 27 , 51 N. W. 267 . These affidavits are ex parte, and cannot be considered upon this hearing.

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Lane

184 Okla. 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1938

Swift & Co., 180 Okla. 252 , 68 P.2d 508 ; while it is the contention of the respondent that it comes within the rule of Fox v. Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P.2d 129 ; E. G. Fike Co. v. … Commission, 178 Okla. 375 , 62 P.2d 1027 , is contrary to the rule announced in Fox v. Brown. We do not so construe that authority.

State Ex Rel. Kehn v. Incorporated Town of Spavinaw City

150 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1931

Riddings, County Attorney, v. … See, also, Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County v. Hatfield, 121 Okla. 28 , 247 Pac. 77 , and Parker v. Board of Commissioners of Tillman County, 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 981 .

Clark v. Warner

85 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1922

In Lawry v. Board of Com’rs of Snohomish Co. et al. … Board of County Commissioners of Payne County, 33 Okla. 353 , 125 Pac. 449 ; Black v. Geissler, 58 Okla. 335 , 159 Pac. 1124 , and Bodine v. McDaniel Auto Co., supra.

Ryan v. Humphries

50 Okla. 343 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1915

This seems to be, in substance, the doctrine laid down in Hill v. City of Indianapolis (C. C.), 92 Fed. 467 ; Daviess County v. Dickinson, 117 U. S. 657 , 6 Sup. Ct. 897, 29 L. Ed. 1026 ; Town of Bloomfield v. … In the first paragraph of the syllabus in Hill v.

School Dist. No. 85 v. School Dist. No. 71

135 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1928

For the reason heretofore recited, this case is not comparable to Smartt v. Board of Com’rs of Craig County, 67 Okla. 144 , 169 Pac. 1161 . … In Levine v.

Bath v. Dumas

108 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1925

Huddleston v. Board of Com’rs, 8 Okla. 614 , 58 Pac. 749 ; Shawnee v. Tecumseh, 52 Okla. 509 , 150 Pac. 890 ; Guthrie v. Stewart, 45 Okla. 603 , 146 Pac. 585 ; Close Bros. v. Okla. … See, also Whitson v. Board of Com’rs, 65 Okla. 273 , 166 Pac. 423 ; Champlin v. Carter, 78 Okla. 300 , 190 Pac. 679 .

In Re Tillman

157 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1932

(Colbaugh v. U. S., 15 F. (2d) 929). The Board of Governors found that said cause comes within paragraph 3, section 4106, O. O'. … CLARK, V. O. J...- concurs in conclusion. LESTER, O. J., and RILEY and ANDREWS, JJ., absent. Note. — See under (2) 2 R. C. L. 939; R. O.'L. Perm. Supp. p. 581.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLARK

2023 OK 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2023

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Bar Ass'n v. Kinsey , 2009 OK 31 212 P.3d 1186 Id . ¶ 16, 212 P.3d at 1192 (citing State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n v. Doris , 1999 OK 94 991 P.2d 1015 Id . Background Count I: Brown Grievance ¶12 Dennis Brown, Sr.'

WOOD v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF OKLAHOMA CITY

2014 OK 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 2014

Brown v. … First, quoting Brown v.

Chickasha Inv. Co. v. Phillips

58 Okla. 760 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1916

it be presented to the board. . … Lane v. C., O. & G. Ry. Co., 19 Okla. 324 , 91 Pac. 883 ; Taylor v. Ins. Co. of North America, 25 Okla. 92 , 105 Pac. 354 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 906 ; Midland Sav. & L. Co. v. Sutton, 30 Okla. 448 , 120 Pac. 1007 ; Adams v.

In Re Hickman

63 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1916

On this point, in Johnson v. … Holcomb v. C., R. *16 I. & P. R. Co., 27 Okla. 667 , 112 Pac. 1023 , is squarely in point. That ease involved the jurisdiction of the district court to entertain an appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace.

Bilby v. Bean

42 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1913

Laws 1910; Olds v. Conger, 1 Okla. 232 , 32 Pac. 337 ; McDonald v. Stiles, 7 Okla. 327 , 54 Pac. 487 ; Dysart v. Enslow, 7 Okla. 386 , 54 Pac. 550 ; Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 1049 ; Anderson v. … Ferguson, 12 Okla. 307 , 71 Pac. 225 ; Jones v. Seawell, 13 Okla. 711 , 76 Pac. 154 ; Zahn v. Obert, 24 Okla. 159 , 103 Pac. 702 ; Vansellous v. Huene, 26 Okla. 243 , 108 Pac. 1102 ; Turner v.

Phillips v. Williams

583 P.2d 488 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1978

United States Board of Parole, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 268 , 511 F.2d 1270 (1974); Cook v. Whiteside, 505 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1974); Mower v. Britton, 504 F.2d 396 (10th Cir. 1974); United States ex rel. Johnson v. … Monks v. State Board of Parole, 58 N. J. 238, 277 A.2d 193, 196 (1971).

State Ex Rel. King v. White

170 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1934

Friend v. Cummings, 47 Okla. 44 , 147 P. 161 . No attention was paid to this act of the Legislature by this school district or school board at that time. … Co. v. Haynes, Co. Tr., 8 Okla. 576 , 58 P. 738 ; Union Sav. Ass’n v. Burns, 74 Okla. 1 , 176 P. 227 ; and Hollis v. Adams Gin Co., 115 Okla. 25 , 241 P. 744 ).

MAREE v. NEUWIRTH

2016 OK 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 2016

BROWN Discussed 2004 OK 16 , 87 P.3d 598 , CHANDLER (U.S.A.), INC. v. TYREE Discussed 2015 OK 24 , 348 P.3d 1080 , BABY F. v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Discussed at Length 1980 OK 84 , 612 P.2d 257 , State ex rel. … Smith v. Banking Bd. Discussed Title 12.