Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.06s

  • Atoka County v. Oklahoma State Bank

    62 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1916

    Laws 1910; chap. 87, sec. 3, Session Laws 1910; Johnson v. Grady County, supra; Board of County-Commissioners, Canadian County et al. v. Tinklepaugh et al., 49 Okla. 440 , 152 Pac. 1119 ; Lusk et al. v. Porter, Co. … In Johnson v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Blackwell v. McCall

    54 Okla. 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1915

    Thereafter Rosa Blackwell married one Brown. … Brown, of Nowata, Indian Territory, is the guardian of Hazel Blackwell and Solomon Blackwell, and that King David Blackwell now lives with his mother, Rosa Brown, nee Blackwell, and that on March 11, 1907, that Archibold

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Williams, County Clerk v. Garfield Exchange

    38 Okla. 539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

    W. 985 ; Stanley v. Board of Supervisors, 131 U. S. 535 , 7 Sup. Ct. 1334, 30 L. Ed. 1000 ; Shelton v. Platt, 139 U. S. 591 , 11 Sup. Ct. 646, 35 L. Ed. 373 ; Pittsburg, etc., Ry. Co. v. Board of Public Works, 173 U. … Cr. v. Babcock, 204 U. S. 585 , 27 Sup. Ct. 326, 51 L. Ed. 636 ; Board of Co. Com’rs, Finnery Co. v. Bullard, Supra; Maish v. Arizona, 164 U. S. 599 , 17 Sup. Ct. 193, 41 L. Ed. 567 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Hedrick v. Padon

    333 P.2d 552 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1958

    Brown, City Atty., Tulsa, for the City of Tulsa. Harry M. Crowe, Jr., Tulsa, Warren M. Sparks, O. Gordon Oldham, T.M. Anderson, Tulsa, for trustees. *553 DAVISON, Justice. … Hill v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. Marshall

    33 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1912

    Stearns et al. v. State ex rel., 23 Okla. 462 , 100 Pac. 909 . … Rosenthal v. State Board of Canvassers, 50 Kan. 129, 32 Pac. 129 , 19 L. R. A. 157, and O’Hara v. Powell et al., 80 N. C. 103 , are directly in point.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Courthouse of Okmulgee County

    58 Okla. 683 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1916

    Board of Liquidation v. Briede, 117 La. 183 , 41 South. 487 ; Grider v. Tally, 77 Ala. 422 , 54 Am. Rep. 65 ; Malmo, v. Commissioners, 72 Conn. 1 , 43 Atl. 485 ; People v. Board of Supervisors, 35 Barb. (N. … The case is not ruled by the opinion in Board of County Com’rs v. Beaver County ex rel. Spohn, Co.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Short v. Norman

    86 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1922

    In McDavid v. Bank of Bay Minette (Ala.) 69 South. 453 , the court quotes from the case of Anderson v. Seymour, 70 Minn. 358 , 73 N. … In Jeffries v. Bacastow. Receiver (G.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Independent School District No. 01 of Okmulgee County

    74 O.B.A.J. 2557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 2003

    Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . See also Kluver v. Weatherford Hosp. … Failing Co. v. Watkins, 2000 OK 76, ¶ 7 , 14 P.3d 52, 56 ; Patterson v. Beall, 2000 OK 92, ¶ 18 , 19 P.3d 839, 845 ; Nealis v. Baird, 1999 OK 98, ¶ 55 , 996 P.2d 438, 460 ; Jackson v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Davis v. McCarty

    388 P.2d 480 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1964

    In Jones v. … See Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 , and cases referred to therein. A co-ordinate branch of the government may never be permitted to destroy itself.

    Overruled in part by Alexander v. Taylor, 51 P.3d 1204 (2002)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. Palmer

    465 P.2d 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1969

    This sum that plaintiff invested in the Brown note, having come to her by inheritance and “[being] acquired by her in her own right” (Coleman v. … In this connéction, notice Honeywell v. Honeywell, Okl., 344 P.2d 589, 591 , and Williams v. Williams, Okl., 428 P.2d 218, 219, 222 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hurst v. Empie

    64 O.B.A.J. 1270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1993

    Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great National Corp., Inc., 614 P.2d 576, 579 (Okla.1980). … Ogden v. Hunt, 286 P.2d 1088, 1090 (Okla.1955); TIB Corporation v. Edmondson, 630 P.2d 1296, 1297 (Okla.1981).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gibson v. Crowder

    196 Okla. 406 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1946

    That conclusion is and must be based upon the rule in Wimberly v. … It was so ruled when this court, in adopting the opinion in Wimberly v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • R.R. Tway, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

    910 P.2d 972 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1995

    Board of Tax Roll Corrections of Tulsa County v. Mack Truck Sales, 620 P.2d 388 (1980). … See Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Barnard v. Douglass-Whaley Grocery Co.

    31 Okla. 124 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

    In Brown v. … For the reasons stated, the opinion of the court in Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Wright

    159 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1932

    Brown, A. W. Brown, and O'llie M. Brown were the owners in possession of the N. % of the N. W. %, the E. % of the S. E. % of the N. W. %, and the N. W. % of the S. E. % of the N. … Brown to J. W.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • North American Petroleum Company v. Knight

    321 P.2d 964 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1958

    In Junction Oil & Gas Co. v. … contend that the measure of damage for breach of an implied covenant to drill a protection well is not the value of the lessors’ royalty that would have been produced from said well and *968 cites in Junction Oil & Gas Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Miller v. INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 56, ETC.

    609 P.2d 756 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1980

    In the 1970 case of Owens v. S. … This leads us to the matter of effect of noncompliance by Board. In the U.S. Supreme Court opinion in the case of Arnett v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Raines v. Independent School District No. 6 of Craig County

    796 P.2d 303 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1990

    For exposition of the Art. 2 § 6 access-to-court right, see Brown v. Burkett, Okl., 750 P.2d 481, 482 (1988); Tulsa Tribune Co. v. Okl. Horse Racing Com'n, Okl., 735 P.2d 548, 554-555 (1987); Moses v. … State, 675 P.2d 432, 435 (Okla. 1983); Board of County Comm'rs. v. Oklahoma Pub. Employees Retirement Sys., 405 P.2d 68, 72 (Okla. 1965); Board of County Comm'rs. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • FRANKENBERG v. STRICKLAND

    348 P.3d 1076 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 2015

    Sheffer v. Carolina Forge Co., 2013 OK 48, ¶ 10 , 306 P.3d 544, 547-48 . … Id. ¶ 12, 161 P.3d at 311 (quoting Draper v. State, 1980 OK 117 , 621 P.2d 1142 ). ¶ 10In the case before us, the Assessor argues that Art.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Assessment of First Nat. Bank of El Reno

    64 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1917

    Tulsa Street Railway Co. v. State, 26 Okla. 559 , 110 Pac. 373 ; Allen et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 ; Board of County Commissioners v. … Bostick v. Board of County Commissioners, supra; Mil-am et al. v. Smith-Mauer Bros., supra; Parker v. Board of County Commissioners, 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 981 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.